In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 30, Heft 8/09
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 29, Heft 8/09
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 30, Heft 8/09
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 30, Heft 8/09
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 30, Heft 8/09
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 29, Heft 8/09
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 29, Heft 8/09
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 30, Heft 8/09
In: Aktuelle Dermatologie: Organ der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Onkologie ; Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Lichtforschung, Band 29, Heft 8/09
We examined the concepts and emotions people associate with their national flag, and how these associations are related to nationalism and patriotism across 11 countries. Factor analyses indicated that the structures of associations differed across countries in ways that reflect their idiosyncratic historical developments. Positive emotions and egalitarian concepts were associated with national flags across countries. However, notable differences between countries were found due to historical politics. In societies known for being peaceful and open-minded (e.g., Canada, Scotland), egalitarianism was separable from honor-related concepts and associated with the flag; in countries that were currently involved in struggles for independence (e.g., Scotland) and countries with an imperialist past (United Kingdom), the flag was strongly associated with power-related concepts; in countries with a negative past (e.g., Germany), the primary association was sports; in countries with disruption due to separatist or extremist movements (e.g., Northern Ireland, Turkey), aggression-related concepts were not disassociated; in collectivist societies (India, Singapore), obedience was linked to positive associations and strongly associated with the flag. In addition, the more strongly individuals endorsed nationalism and patriotism, the more they associated positive emotions and egalitarian concepts with their flag. Implications of these findings are discussed.
This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record ; Data availability: Data, code, and materials are available at the following link: https://osf.io/5uxc7/ ; The relationships between subjective status and perceived legitimacy are important for understanding the extent to which people with low status are complicit in their oppression. We use novel data from 66 samples and 30 countries (N = 12,788) and find that people with higher status see the social system as more legitimate than those with lower status, but there is variation across people and countries. The association between subjective status and perceived legitimacy was never negative at any levels of eight moderator variables, although the positive association was sometimes reduced. Although not always consistent with hypotheses, group identification, self‐esteem, and beliefs in social mobility were all associated with perceived legitimacy among people who have low subjective status. These findings enrich our understanding of the relationship between social status and legitimacy. ; Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research ; European Union Horizon 2020 ; Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies ; Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico ; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness ; Czech Science Foundation ; Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences