Suchergebnisse

Cover -- Half Title -- Series Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgements -- List of Abbreviations -- Introduction -- Eastern Europe: Memory of an Empire and Ecological Rebels? -- The Big Beast of Ideology -- Incomplete Ethnography for an Incomplete Ideology: The Method -- Overview of the Chapters -- 1 Far-Right Ecologist: Introducing the Spectrum -- Ecofascism: The Nazi Environmentalists and Misanthropic Neo-Malthusians -- Conservatism and Ecology: Local Identities as Historical Loyalties? -- Nationalism and Populism: Enhancing the Perimeter -- Conclusion -- 2 Far Right in Hungary and Poland -- Historical Commonalities as Points of Departure -- Far Right in Hungary: Living With Trianon -- Far Right in Poland: Narodowcy i nacjonaliści -- Conclusion -- 3 Greening the Core: The Central Concepts of FRE -- Who "We" are Not: The Threefold Axis of Meta-Enemies -- The Concrete Opponents: Communists, International Organisations and Greens -- Who "We" are: The (Reasonable) People Respectful of their Traditions -- Naturalism -- Organicism -- Conclusion -- 4 The Perimeter: Nostalgia, Autarky, Spirituality and Authority -- Nostalgia -- Autarky -- Spirituality -- Authority: "The Green Royalism" or Away From Eco-Dictatorship? -- Conclusion -- 5 FRE in Action: Policy and Activism -- Climate Change Acceptance: This (May) Change Everything -- Energy and Pollution -- Administrative Matters, Pollution, Biodiversity and Forestry -- Animal Welfare and Decision-Making -- Conclusion -- Conclusion -- The (Problematic) Potential of FRE -- On Method, Research and Limits -- What the Future (Research) Holds For FRE -- Appendix 1 - Overview of Interviews -- Index.

Cette contribution balise les orientations de la réception de l'œuvre de Jean Remy en langue portugaise en tenant compte du fait qu'il est un auteur pluriel , avant d'être un auteur collectif . Son œuvre est vaste et éclectique, avec de multiples points d'ancrage empiriques qui débouchent sur différents cadres interprétatifs. Il est tout aussi important de tenir compte du cadre académique dans lequel J. Remy a travaillé. Peu de ses travaux sont traduits en portugais et il est souvent cité en français. Pour l'essentiel, l'appropriation de son œuvre en langue portugaise se fait à l'intérieur d'un « triangle » constitué par : sa démarche méthodologique, l'intentionnalité théorique qui marque l'ensemble de son œuvre et l'approche pédagogique qui en découle.

Abstract
This article tries to explain why, if those countries that applied an elimination strategy in respect of the covid-19 pandemic experienced fewer deaths and relatively fewer negative impacts on their economies, the ruling bourgeoisie of other countries did not promote similar measures. Additionally, it attempts to explain why people have not widely demanded that policies be implemented to eliminate the circulation of the virus. The article suggests that, in order to better understand these behaviours, it is necessary to frame them in the context of the profound crisis of hegemony in which most of Europe and America was already plunged before the arrival of the covid-19 virus.

This article comparatively analyzes the central lines of the political strategies carried out in Brazil and Argentina by PT and Kirchnerism between 2003 and 2015/16. In particular, special attention is paid to the logics they displayed in their attempt to dispute the hegemony of neoliberalism. This analysis was carried out based on the distinction between two logics in the construction of the hegemony formulated by Ernesto Laclau, although incorporating some reformulations of my own. Thereby, these political processes were interpreted according to the importance of "administrativist" or "agonal" logic in the ways in which each force tried to build hegemony. ; Este artículo analiza comparativamente las líneas centrales de las estrategias políticas llevadas adelante en Brasil y Argentina por parte del PT y del kirchnerismo entre 2003 y 2015/16. En particular, se presta especial atención a las lógicas que desplegaron en su intento de disputar la hegemonía al neoliberalismo. Este análisis fue realizado a partir de la distinción entre dos lógicas en la construcción de la hegemonía que formulara Ernesto Laclau, aunque incorporándole algunas reformulaciones propias. De este modo, se interpretaron estos procesos políticos según la importancia que tuvieron la lógica "administrativista" o la lógica "agonal" en las formas en que cada fuerza procuró construir la hegemonía. ; Este artigo analisa comparativamente as linhas centrais das estratégias políticas realizadas no Brasil e na Argentina pelo PT e pelo kirchnerismo entre 2003 e 2015/16. Em particular, é dada especial atenção à lógica que eles desenvolveram na tentativa de contestar a hegemonia do neoliberalismo. Essa análise foi realizada com base na distinção entre duas lógicas na construção da hegemonia formulada por Ernesto Laclau, embora incorporando algumas reformulações próprias. Dessa forma, esses processos políticos foram interpretados de acordo com a importância da lógica "administrativista" ou "agonal" nas maneiras pelas quais cada força procurava construir hegemonia.

This article analyzes the main aspects of the so called "philological" readings of Gramsci's Prison Notebooks and their possible contributions to think about political strategy. The first group of innovations of these readings is composed by the abandonment of the structure-superstructure metaphor, the relativization of the concept of "law", and a more accurate notion of "crisis". The second group of contributions is made up of the conceptualization of hegemony as relations of forces and as a struggle for hegemony, the relativization of the concept of "historical bloc", and the clarification of the relationship between civil society and political society. And, finally, the third group of innovations comprehends the development of a perspective that think the hegemony as subjectivity's construction and that differentiates between different types of hegemony. Gramsci, "Philological" Readings, Political Strategy, Hegemony

AbstractIn their attempts to associate the nationalistic ideology with speculative promises to emancipate the people from malevolent 'outsiders', right‐wing populists often engage with rural and agricultural topics. Meanwhile, green parties, commonly associated with the progressive ideas of environmentally friendly agriculture, occasionally employ the binary logic of agrarian populism. This paper has three objectives. First, to identify the discursive features of rural (right‐wing and agrarian) populism. Second, to examine how these discursive differences unfold in agricultural, party politics. Third, to examine the implications of overlapping ideas of populist and green parties for emancipatory rural politics. The study is predominantly based on the analysis of political discourses in Hungary: Jobbik (right‐wing populist) and LMP (green party), while the agricultural discourse of Fidesz, the ruling right‐wing populist party will serve as the background to the analysis. Particular attention is given to the aesthetic, symbolic, and material dimensions of land in discourse, including environmentally friendly farming and the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).