A review of protocols used for assessment of carbon stock in forested landscapes
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 16, S. 81-89
ISSN: 1462-9011
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 16, S. 81-89
ISSN: 1462-9011
In: Land use policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, Band 138, S. 107031
ISSN: 0264-8377
In: TFP-D-23-00441
SSRN
SSRN
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 53, Heft 5, S. 913-929
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: Wildlife research, Band 45, Heft 4, S. 381
ISSN: 1448-5494, 1035-3712
Context
Livestock depredation is a major conservation challenge around the world, causing considerable economical losses to pastoral communities and often result in retaliatory killing. In Mongolia, livestock depredation rates are thought to be increasing due to changes in pastoral practices and the transformation of wild habitats into pasture lands. Few studies have examined the interactions between humans and carnivores and even fewer have considered how recent changes in pastoral practices may affect depredation rates.
Aim
This study aimed to assess the influence of herding practices on self-reported livestock losses to snow leopards and wolves in two communities in South Gobi, Mongolia.
Methods
In total, 144 herder households were interviewed and an information-theoretic approach was used to analyse the factors influencing self-reported livestock losses to snow leopards and wolves.
Key results
The majority of self-reported losses to both snow leopards and wolves occurred when herds were left unattended in the pastures. The economic loss associated with livestock losses to snow leopards and wolves amounted to an average loss of US$825 per herder and year. The number of livestock owned by a household and the frequency of shifting campsite had the strongest influence on livestock losses to snow leopards and wolves. Other determinants of livestock losses included frequency of visiting the soum (county) centre.
Implications
On the basis of the findings, we make recommendations for mitigating the conflict with large carnivores, with focus on guiding future herding practices.
In: Wildlife research, Band 45, Heft 3, S. 237
ISSN: 1448-5494, 1035-3712
Context
Livestock depredation is a major conservation challenge around the world, causing considerable economical losses to pastoral communities and often result in retaliatory killing. In Mongolia, livestock depredation rates are thought to be increasing due to changes in pastoral practices and the transformation of wild habitats into pasture lands. Few studies have examined the interactions between humans and carnivores and even fewer have considered how recent changes in pastoral practices may affect depredation rates.
Aim
This study aimed to assess the influence of herding practices on self-reported livestock losses to snow leopards and wolves in two communities in South Gobi, Mongolia.
Methods
In total, 144 herder households were interviewed and an information-theoretic approach was used to analyse the factors influencing self-reported livestock losses to snow leopards and wolves.
Key results
The majority of self-reported losses to both snow leopards and wolves occurred when herds were left unattended in the pastures. The economic loss associated with livestock losses to snow leopards and wolves amounted to an average loss of US$825 per herder and year. The number of livestock owned by a household and the frequency of shifting campsite had the strongest influence on livestock losses to snow leopards and wolves. Other determinants of livestock losses included frequency of visiting the soum (county) centre.
Implications
On the basis of the findings, we make recommendations for mitigating the conflict with large carnivores, with focus on guiding future herding practices.
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 24, Heft 3
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Dudley , N , Hockings , M , Stolton , S , Amend , T , Badola , R , Bianco , M , Chettri , N , Cook , C , Day , J C , Dearden , P , Edwards , M , Ferraro , P , Foden , W , Gambino , R , Gaston , K J , Hayward , N , Hickey , V , Irving , J , Jeffries , B , Karapetyan , A , Kettunen , M , Laestadius , L , Laffoley , D , Lham , D , Lichtenstein , G , Makombo , J , Marshall , N , McGeoch , M , Nguyen , D , Nogué , S , Paxton , M , Rao , M , Reichelt , R , Rivas , J , Roux , D , Rutte , C , Schreckenberg , K , Sovinc , A , Sutyrina , S , Utomo , A , Vallauri , D , Vedeld , P O , Verschuuren , B , Waithaka , J , Woodley , S , Wyborn , C & Zhang , Y 2018 , ' Priorities for protected area research ' , Parks , vol. 24 , no. 1 , pp. 35-50 . https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PARKS-24-1ND.en
A hundred research priorities of critical importance to protected area management were identified by a targeted survey of conservation professionals; half researchers and half practitioners. Respondents were selected to represent a range of disciplines, every continent except Antarctica and roughly equal numbers of men and women. The results analysed thematically and grouped as potential research topics as by both practitioners and researchers. Priority research gaps reveal a high interest to demonstrate the role of protected areas within a broader discussion about sustainable futures and if and how protected areas can address a range of conservation and socio-economic challenges effectively. The paper lists the hundred priorities structured under broad headings of management, ecology, governance and social (including political and economic issues) and helps contribute to setting future research agendas.
BASE