Explaining the Diversity of Motivations Behind Community Renewable Energy
In: Energy Policy, Volume 93, Issue 278-90
20 results
Sort by:
In: Energy Policy, Volume 93, Issue 278-90
SSRN
In: Annals of public and cooperative economics, Volume 88, Issue 2, p. 203-232
ISSN: 1467-8292
ABSTRACTOne potential major role of social economy organizations in sustainability transitions is the creation and mobilization of social capital. Yet, the social economy gathers very distinct organizational models which may be associated with different types and levels of social capital. Accordingly, the objective of this article is to explore whether, and if so how, the type and level of social capital differ between mutual benefit organizations – which essentially seek to meet their members' needs – and public benefit organizations – which seek to enhance the well‐being of a broader community or the society as a whole. The study draws on an econometric analysis of different forms of social capital in two renewable energy cooperatives which are located in Flanders but have clearly divergent orientations toward mutual versus public benefit. The results show that, as compared with an orientation toward public benefit, an orientation toward mutual benefit is associated with lower social identification with the cooperative and weaker ties between members. Our study explores the underlying explanatory mechanisms behind these relationships. Its findings contribute to understanding the potential roles played by cooperatives in sustainability transitions.
SSRN
Working paper
In: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Volume 88, Issue 2, p. 203-232
SSRN
Do informal initiatives share a capitalist spirit of entrepreneurship? This article attempts to answer this question, using a "popular economy" analytical framework and focusing on the case of Chile. First, we present the context of the research, namely the economic and political evolutions in Chile since the 1970s and their effects on the popular economy. Then, we seek to answer the original question, relying on in-depth case studies of so-called "popular economy organizations". Our research shows that their socio-economic logics significantly differ from those of the traditional capitalist firm. Our observations also suggest important differences between current and older initiatives. ; Peer reviewed
BASE
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Volume 64, p. 65-78
In: World Development, Volume 64, p. 65–78
SSRN
SSRN
In: Environmental innovation and societal transitions, Volume 42, p. 138-151
ISSN: 2210-4224
Community enterprises may play pivotal roles in sustainability transitions but have received limited attention in the transitions literature. This paper proposes a framework for theorising the challenges that community enterprises face as they scale up due to the rising institutional complexity of their organisational model, combining the institutional logics of community, market, and corporation. We conceptualise the upscaling processes of community enterprises by distinguishing between the community volunteerism phase, the niche creation phase and the niche expansion phase. We formulate nine propositions on how institutional complexity arises and on possible mechanisms to manage it in each phase of the upscaling process. Our theoretical framework is supported by empirical research on carsharing and renewable energy initiatives in Western Europe. The paper concludes with some avenues for further research on community enterprises in sustainability transitions. ; Community enterprises may play pivotal roles in sustainability transitions but have received limited attention in the transitions literature. This paper proposes a framework for theorising the challenges that community enterprises face as they scale up due to the rising institutional complexity of their organisational model, combining the institutional logics of community, market, and corporation. We conceptualise the upscaling processes of community enterprises by distinguishing between the community volunteerism phase, the niche creation phase and the niche expansion phase. We formulate nine propositions on how institutional complexity arises and on possible mechanisms to manage it in each phase of the upscaling process. Our theoretical framework is supported by empirical research on carsharing and renewable energy initiatives in Western Europe. The paper concludes with some avenues for further research on community enterprises in sustainability transitions. ; Peer reviewed
BASE
Community enterprises may play pivotal roles in sustainability transitions but have received limited attention in the transitions literature. This paper proposes a framework for theorising the challenges that community enterprises face as they scale up due to the rising institutional complexity of their organisational model, combining the institutional logics of community, market, and corporation. We conceptualise the upscaling processes of community enterprises by distinguishing between the community volunteerism phase, the niche creation phase and the niche expansion phase. We formulate nine propositions on how institutional complexity arises and on possible mechanisms to manage it in each phase of the upscaling process. Our theoretical framework is supported by empirical research on carsharing and renewable energy initiatives in Western Europe. The paper concludes with some avenues for further research on community enterprises in sustainability transitions.
BASE
In: Kirchherr, J., Bauwens, T., Ramos, T. (2022). Circular Disruption: Concepts, Enablers and Ways Ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3096
SSRN
In: Energy Research & Social Science, 2016. 13: p. 136-147.
SSRN
In: Environmental innovation and societal transitions, Volume 48, p. 100749
ISSN: 2210-4224
In: JEPO-D-22-01953
SSRN