Suchergebnisse

The 2019 General Election (Pemilu, Indonesia) divided Indonesian society into two sides, namely the #2019GantiPresiden and the #Jokowi2Periode. The situation between the two sides was tense, which could potentially cause a commotion and worsen the public's situation. Supporters of Jokowi's camp describe the #2019GantiPresiden movement as an attempt to commit makar (treason) against the legitimate government, while the government's opposing side describes the accusation of treason as a violation of democratic freedoms. Based on the foregoing, the question arises as to whether going against the government can be considered makar, which is a criminal act. This study is a type of normative research that uses library research to collect data. This study concludes that opposing the government (Oposisi) or criticizing the government is not makar, but rather the right to free expression. Makar as a negative brand image should not exist in a democratic post-reform environment. It should be used sparingly so that there is no arbitrariness that violates human rights. This corresponds to the definition of al-bughah in Islamic criminal law. Pemilihan umum (Pemilu) pada tahun 2019 telah memecahkan masyarakat dengan dua kubu/ dua gerakan, yaitu gerakan #2019GantiPresiden dan gerakan #Jokowi2Periode. Situasi pun mencekam antara kedua belah pihak yang berpotensi mengarah kepada keributan, dan menyebabkan kondisi masyarakat semakin memanas. Pendukung kubu Jokowi menyebut gerakan #2019GantiPresiden merupakan upaya makar terhadap pemerintahan yang sah, sementara kubu diseberang pemerintah (oposisi) menyebut tuduhan makar tersebut merupakan pelanggaran terhadap kebebasan demokrasi. Berdasarkan latar belakang diatas timbul pertanyaan apakah bersebrangan dengan pemerintah dapat dikatakan sebagai makar yang merupakan tindak pidana? Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian normatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui penelusuran kepustakaan (method of library). Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa bersebrangan dengan pemerintah ...

Responding to demands from a group of parties to formalize Islamic law, the Counter Legal Draft Compilation of Islamic Law (CLD KHI) team has compiled a pluralist, democratic, humanist, and gender fair Islamic law text.This manuscript reaps pros and cons during society because it is considered not in line with the values contained in the Qur'an and hadith.Because of the discrepancy between the opinions of most jurists in general with the contents of the CLD-KHI, of course, it will result in the absence of legal certainty in the future. The object of this research is only focused on the concept of walimujbir. The method used in this research is a qualitative method with a descriptive approach, data is collected openly according to what is obtained from primary and secondary sources. The results of this study indicate that the presence of a guardian in a marriage is positioned as a pillar of Marriage. In contrast, in the CLD-KHI formulation, a guardian is not required in a marriage. The formulation of Islamic family law reform offered by CLD-KHI is based solely on public logic, local wisdom, and on several perspectives such as democracy, pluralism, human rights, justice, gender equality, and western ideology. In matters of marriage, especially regarding guardians of mujbir, the ideas of CLD-KHI are different and even contradict the common understanding of principles of Islamic teachings and practices.

This paper aims to explore the thoughts of Abdurrahman Wahid about Islam and plurarism in political development in Indonesia, referring to the condition of the Indonesian nation that is difficult to live amid a climate of religious plurality, then he voiced the call for peaceful coexistence in the social life of religious communities in Indonesia. For Abdurrahman, with his keen thoughts on religion and nationalism, he directed his thoughts on inclusiveness in religious life. This paper is presented in the literature review. The results can be drawn from this paper, that the plurarism according to Gus Dur, namely the existence of awareness to know each other and dialogue sincerely so that one group with each other take and give. Islam as the majority religion in Indonesia, continued Gus Dur, has important values in creating harmony among peoples and achieve political stability in Indonesia. This idea can be glimpsed in terms of indigenous Islam, democratic values and human rights, humanitarian principles in the plurality of society, the principle of justice, egalitarian