Reducing Participant Costs Without Sacrificing Statistical Power in Consumer Research: An Introduction to Pre-registered Interim Analysis Designs (Priads)
In: Journal of Consumer Research (https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae028)
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of Consumer Research (https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae028)
SSRN
In: INSEAD Working Paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: INSEAD Working Paper No. 2018/33/MKT
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 51, Heft 4, S. 845-865
ISSN: 1537-5277
Abstract
The difficulty of determining how many observations to collect is a source of inefficiency in consumer behavior research. Group sequential designs, which allow researchers to perform interim analyses while data collection is ongoing, could offer a remedy. However, they are scarcely used in consumer behavior research, probably owing to low awareness, perceived complexity, or concerns about the validity of this approach. This article offers a tutorial on group sequential designs and introduces Pre-Registered Interim Analysis Designs (PRIADs): A practical five-step procedure to facilitate the adoption of these designs in marketing. We show that group sequential designs can be easily adopted by marketing researchers, and introduce a companion app to help researchers implement them. We demonstrate multiple benefits of PRIADs for researchers engaged in confirmatory hypothesis testing: They facilitate sample size decisions, allow researchers to achieve a desired level of statistical power with a smaller number of observations, and help conduct more efficient pilot studies. We validate this cost-saving potential through a comprehensive re-analysis of 212 studies published in the Journal of Consumer Research, which shows that using PRIADs would have reduced participant costs by 20–29%. We conclude with a discussion of limitations and possible alternatives to PRIADs.
In: Journal of consumer research: JCR ; an interdisciplinary journal, Band 48, Heft 5, S. 756-774
ISSN: 1537-5277
AbstractPrice knowledge is a key antecedent of many consumer judgments and decisions. This article examines consumers' ability to form accurate beliefs about the minimum, the maximum, and the overall variability of prices for multiple product categories. Eight experiments provide evidence for a novel phenomenon we call dispersion spillover: Consumers tend to overestimate price dispersion in a category after encountering another category in which prices are more dispersed (vs. equally or less dispersed). Our experiments show that this dispersion spillover is consequential: It influences the likelihood that consumers will search for (and find) better prices and offers, and how much consumers bid in auctions. Finally, we disentangle two cognitive processes that might underlie dispersion spillover. Our results suggest that judgments of dispersion are not only based on specific prices stored in memory and that dispersion spillover does not simply reflect the inappropriate activation of prices from other categories. Instead, it appears that consumers also form "intuitive statistics" of dispersion: Summary representations that encode the dispersion of prices in the environment but that are insufficiently category specific.
In: Customer Needs and Solutions, Forthcoming
SSRN