Suchergebnisse
Filter
16 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
LE TECNICHE LEGISLATIVE ED IL LORO PROFILO SEMPLIFICATORIO: L'ISTITUTO DELLA DELEGAZIONE LEGISLATIVA
la tesi tratta le varie problematiche del nostro ordinamento legate ai temi della eccessiva quantità della regolazione normativa e della scarsa qualità della normazione in tutti i suoi molteplici aspetti, a partire dalla scarsa qualità del linguaggio normativo, per poi giungere a quelli che sono stati i processi semplificatori volti a fronteggiare questi vizi del nostro ordinamento, i vari riferimenti normativi in tema di semplificazione avuti a partire dagli anni 90, si pensi alle cosiddette Leggi Bassanini e le leggi di semplificazione del 2001 e del 2005, per giungere infine all'analisi più specifica di un istituto di semplificazione normativa che è rappresentato dal ricorso alla delegazione legislativa. In quest'ultimo caso concentrerò la mia attenzione a questo fenomeno limitatamente alle ultime due legislature, ossia la XVI e la XVII, che ne hanno visto un ampio utilizzo anche in settori molto ampi, si pensi a quello delle pubbliche amministrazioni, con la Riforma Madia, oppure a quello del mercato del lavoro con il Jobs act del Governo Renzi.
BASE
Psicologia sociale dell'azione collettiva: il movimento new global in Italia
In: Contributi
In: Psicologia
The Quality of Disclosures on Environmental Policy: The Profile of Financial Intermediaries
In: Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, Band 23, Heft 5, S. 283-296
ISSN: 1535-3966
ABSTRACTThis study investigates the quality of voluntary disclosures on environmental policy by financial intermediaries (FIs), analyzing the Global Reporting Initiative's data. Through k‐means cluster analysis, four segments of FIs are identified. Our results show a heterogeneous reality. The quality of disclosures is associated to the FIs' attributes and the home country's characteristics: FIs' size and operating profitability, national economic wealth, and national environmental performance. No association is found with the FIs' business area or their quotation on the stock market. The FIs' relevance for their domestic economy is not significant either. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
"Frontrunners": An investigation of the discursive construction of "women politicians" intersectional identity
This paper explores how female politicians discursively construct their intersectional identity as "women politicians." We interviewed 10 female politicians in charge of local political offices and examined how they talked about the boundaries and contents of their "women politicians" identity. When talking about identity boundaries, the interviewees first presented "women politicians" as an exclusive minority within their gender group. Second, they constructed intergroup categorizations by comparing women who meet the requirements to enter politics versus women who do not. When talking about identity contents, the interviewees constructed intergroup categorizations along the ideological axis only. Thus, they overlooked the differences between men and women who share the same ideology while they enhanced the differences among women of different ideologies. Overall, the interviewees constructed their "women politicians" identity as a subordinate identity within their overarching ideological identity rather than as a real intersectional identity. These results are discussed also in terms of discursive de-politicization of the "women politicians" intersectional identity. ; peerReviewed ; publishedVersion
BASE
'Frontrunners': An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of 'Women Politicians' Intersectional Identity
This paper explores how female politicians discursively construct their intersectional identity as "women politicians." We interviewed 10 female politicians in charge of local political offices and examined how they talked about the boundaries and contents of their "women politicians" identity. When talking about identity boundaries, the interviewees first presented "women politicians" as an exclusive minority within their gender group. Second, they constructed intergroup categorizations by comparing women who meet the requirements to enter politics versus women who do not. When talking about identity contents, the interviewees constructed intergroup categorizations along the ideological axis only. Thus, they overlooked the differences between men and women who share the same ideology while they enhanced the differences among women of different ideologies. Overall, the interviewees constructed their "women politicians" identity as a subordinate identity within their overarching ideological identity rather than as a real intersectional identity. These results are discussed also in terms of discursive de-politicization of the "women politicians" intersectional identity.
BASE
'Frontrunners': An Investigation of the Discursive Construction of 'Women Politicians' Intersectional Identity
This paper explores how female politicians discursively construct their intersectional identity as "women politicians." We interviewed 10 female politicians in charge of local political offices and examined how they talked about the boundaries and contents of their "women politicians" identity. When talking about identity boundaries, the interviewees first presented "women politicians" as an exclusive minority within their gender group. Second, they constructed intergroup categorizations by comparing women who meet the requirements to enter politics versus women who do not. When talking about identity contents, the interviewees constructed intergroup categorizations along the ideological axis only. Thus, they overlooked the differences between men and women who share the same ideology while they enhanced the differences among women of different ideologies. Overall, the interviewees constructed their "women politicians" identity as a subordinate identity within their overarching ideological identity rather than as a real intersectional identity. These results are discussed also in terms of discursive de-politicization of the "women politicians" intersectional identity.
BASE
Online discussion and the moral pathway to identity politicization and collective action
Research on the mobilizing potential of the Internet has produced some controversy between optimistic vs. skeptical perspectives. Although some attention has been paid to the effects of online discussions on collective participation, very little is known about how people's experience of online interactions affects the key psychosocial predictors of collective action. The present research investigated whether use of the Internet as a channel for deliberation influenced the moral pathway to collective mobilization by shaping users' politicized identity, thereby indirectly influencing collective action. Results showed that when people perceived online discussions as a constructive communication context, their politicized identity was imbued with the meaning of responding to a moral obligation, and willingness to participate in collective action was sustained. However, when participants perceived that online discussions were not constructive, their identification with the movement did not refer to moral obligation, and intention to participate in collective action was not sustained. Our discussion focuses on the need to deepen investigation of how people experience the particularities of interacting online, and on how this can affect psychosocial processes leading to collective action. ; peerReviewed ; publishedVersion
BASE
Online Discussion and the Moral Pathway to Identity Politicization and Collective Action
Research on the mobilizing potential of the Internet has produced some controversy between optimistic vs. skeptical perspectives. Although some attention has been paid to the effects of online discussions on collective participation, very little is known about how people's experience of online interactions affects the key psychosocial predictors of collective action. The present research investigated whether use of the Internet as a channel for deliberation influenced the moral pathway to collective mobilization by shaping users' politicized identity, thereby indirectly influencing collective action. Results showed that when people perceived online discussions as a constructive communication context, their politicized identity was imbued with the meaning of responding to a moral obligation, and willingness to participate in collective action was sustained. However, when participants perceived that online discussions were not constructive, their identification with the movement did not refer to moral obligation, and intention to participate in collective action was not sustained. Our discussion focuses on the need to deepen investigation of how people experience the particularities of interacting online, and on how this can affect psychosocial processes leading to collective action.
BASE
Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action
In: Group processes & intergroup relations: GPIR, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 43-59
ISSN: 1461-7188
Although online discussions may stimulate political participation, little is known about how computer-mediated communication among members of political groups contributes to develop their politicized identity, thus indirectly stimulating collective action. Two studies involving activists from two web-based social movements investigated how online discussions moderate the effects of collective efficacy, group-based anger, and moral obligation on politicized identity. Self-reported frequency of online discussions and activists' perceptions of two content-related characteristics of online discussions both interacted with collective efficacy and moral obligation beliefs in predicting politicized identity. Politicized identity mediated the effects of these interactions on collective action intention. We discuss how specific characteristics of online political discussions may contribute to politicize group identity via group-level and individual-level paths.
Does the Candidate Matter? Comparing the Voting Choice of Early and Late Deciders
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 33, Heft 5, S. 619-634
ISSN: 1467-9221
Candidate personality traits have long been recognized as influential in the determination of voting choice. However, little is understood of how the perception of candidates' traits influences different categories of voters. Based on a large‐scale electoral‐panel survey (ITANES, ITAlian National Election Studies), the present study investigated whether the voting choice of early and late deciders differentially relied on candidate traits. Results showed that after considering the influence of ideology and economy assessment, candidate traits still influenced the voting choice of early deciders and, even more, of late deciders. However, while early deciders took into account both incumbent and challenger traits, late deciders mainly relied on incumbent traits. Political sophistication moderated this effect, with high‐sophisticated early deciders relying even more on the challenger, and low‐sophisticated late deciders relying even more on the incumbent. The distinction between incumbent and challenger is discussed as a key variable in explaining the role of candidate traits in the choice of voters differing as to voting decision time and political sophistication.
Does the Candidate Matter? Comparing the Voting Choice of Early and Late Deciders
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 33, Heft 5, S. 619-635
ISSN: 0162-895X
World Affairs Online
Savings Banks and Savings Facilities in African Countries
In: African economic history, Heft 2, S. 76
ISSN: 2163-9108
Cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment in human hepatoma (HepG2) cells exposed to copper oxide, copper-iron oxide and carbon nanoparticles
In: Ecotoxicology and environmental safety: EES ; official journal of the International Society of Ecotoxicology and Environmental safety, Band 189, S. 109982
ISSN: 1090-2414