Suchergebnisse

Transformation of normative regulation of the public procurement system in the
conditions of formation of the Eurasian Union is a very important tool in formation of
common markets of goods and services. However, its impact on the development of
entrepreneurial activity is ambiguous, which requires the development of regulatory
impact assessment instruments of projects normative acts in the field of development
of competition policy and procurement system of Eurasian Economy Union.

In the new informational society the most effective way of information filtering is through manipulation of individual consciousness. Thus, the role of the censorship institute is taken to the sphere of high technologies and scientific researches of the human psyche. There was a genuine revolution in the ways of social and political government. The main trend of evolution of authority's technologies and the aim of their change and improvement is in achieving the maximum effect of influence upon people and their voluntary submission with the minimum expenditures.

The article provides a transdisciplinary analysis of mediation as an alternative conflict resolution procedure under the realities of modern Russian society. The brief review of modern scientific research conducted in the article allowed us to make a comparative analysis between different methods of conflict resolution, to consider the reasons for the greater public popularity of dispute resolution through the system of state coercion and the less popular alternative procedure – mediation. At the same time, we analyze the new alternative procedure − involving a judicial conciliator in the resolution of a dispute. It is shown that the participation of a judicial conciliator in conflict resolution is new in law, and, consequently, in the sociocultural system of Russian society.

Since the invention of telegraph, radio and television making the contacts with a large audience possible, the social impact of communication via the mass media has been a subject of intense research by political and social scientists. Thus the authors consider the nature of manipulation in modern political discourse using the complex phenomenon of censorship and its ambivalent role in the modern society as the basis. The solution of the research tasks is carried out on the basis of the complex methodological foundation defining the general orientation and principles of the research, as well as its scientific results. This foundation includes the general philosophical methodological concept of dialectic materialism, the principles of unity of form and content, cause and effect, as well as the general connection of the phenomena. In conclusion, the authors state that the abovementioned phenomena are serious and dangerous, being able to influence people's consciousness, depriving them of their critical thinking, and even dooming them to the passivity of life.