Suchergebnisse

Исследование направлено на выявление актуальности компонентов пропозициональной структуры производного имени в языковом сознании носителя языка посредством лингвистического эксперимента, активизирующего метаязыковой компонент языкового сознания. Метаязыковой компонент проявляется в получаемых от респондентов дефинициях как результат выбора различных лингвистических стратегий: использование мотивирующей основы и единицы, синонимичной мотивирующей основе, экспликация оценочных компонентов пропозициональной структуры производного. Полученные результаты эксперимента подтверждают выдвигаемую гипотезу об активации метаязыкового сознания при восприятии производного имени и ставят новые задачи перед исследователем. ; Morphologically complex words are presently regarded in cognitive science as valuable resources for language and cognition studies. The intricate implicit semantics of a derivative reflects basic mechanisms of categorization, characterization, mental representations and nomination. The research combines propositional and experimental paradigms in studying the metalinguistic cognitive activation potential of derivative semantic components. Propositional approach to the study of implicit semantics results in a detailed motivational formula of the derivative explicating the cognitive grounds of the nomination ((S2) believes that (S1) is characterized by (?),where Р=N (М1=0), but S1 is characterized by P always, often, is prone to, likes and, consequently, Р'>N ^2qn) and does it well or badly (Mql) => and it causes reaction good/bad (М3).). The issue under discussion is to what extent implicit propositional components of a derivative activate the metalinguistic cognition of a native speaker in the reverse naming task. The reverse naming task makes the respondent provide an extended definition of the derivative under study. The study is based on semantic components of a specific language material Russian derivatives of a syncretic type which combine nominative and evaluative functions in their semantics in their semantics. The material under investigation includes derivatives of the following derivational patterns of the Russian language: Verb + suffix -ok, -ach, -uh(a), -k(a), -ulj(a), -sh(a) ush(a), -oh(a), ah(a), -jag(a), -ak(a), -l(a), ug(a). E.g.: p'et' (to sing) pev-uha; pisat' (to write) pis-aka; hohotat' (to laugh loudly) hohot-un; strel'jat'(to shoot) strel-ok. Adjective + suffix -ak, -ach, -k(a), -uh(a), -ush(a), -yshk(a), -ish, -ag(a), -ug(a), -uk(a), -ul'(ja). E.g.: lovkij (crafty) lovk-ach; veselyj (jolly) veselch-ak. Noun + suffix -ach, -an, -jag(a), -un, -juh(a), -jush(a). E.g.: politika (politics) politik-an; nos (nose) nos-ach; stil'(style) -stil-jaga. In the frame of a specially designed experiment the explication of implicit components of a derivative motivational formula is checked and linguistic means of such explication are described: e.g.: veselch-ak is a person who likes (М2 qn) to enjoy life and does not care about other people (M3). The main concern is to reveal whether verbalization of propositional components is copied from the root word or whether it can be a product of activated metalinguistic cognition. The results show linguistic evidence of activation in 50% cases which provides grounds for further speculations on the topic of the specific cognitive nature of morphologically complex words.