Suchergebnisse

Статья посвящена процессам самоидентификации российской интеллигенции, проблемам взаимоотношений интеллигенции, власти и общества, роли интеллигенции в принятии политических решений в российской истории. ; The article is devoted to the processes of self-identification of the Russian intelligencia, problems of relations of intelligencia, authorities and society, the role of intelligencia in taking political decisions in the Russian history.

В статье рассмотрены теоретические аспекты неокорпоративной модели взаимодействия групп интересов и власти, выявлены особенности российской модели профсоюзного движения в контексте неокорпоративизма. ; This article describes theoretical aspects of neocorporative interaction model of interest groups and the government, the peculiarities of the Russian model of the trade union movement in the context of neocorporativism.

Статья посвящена анализу процессов формирования взаимодействия государства, гражданского общества и бизнеса в России. В качестве эмпирической базы по исследуемым вопросам были использованы результаты социологических исследований, проводившихся Фондом общественного мнения в 2015 г., учеными Южно-Российского института управления филиала РАНХиГС при Президенте РФ в 2012 и 2016 годах. По поводу механизмов взаимоотношения власти, бизнеса и гражданского общества 44 % опрошенных в регионах отдали предпочтение их социальному партнерству. Авторы полагают, что реализация миссии «Общественного договора-2030» возможна через механизм государственно-частного партнерства (ГЧП), который является наиболее перспективным и эффективным институтом в современных экономико-политических условиях России. Достижение стратегических целей государства по обеспечению перевода страны на инновационный путь развития, ориентированный на снижение экспортно-ресурсной зависимости страны в контексте миссии «Общественный договор-2030» и стратегии национальной безопасности страны, невозможно без формирования партнерских отношений государства, общества и коммерческих структур. ; The article is devoted to analysis of formation processes of interaction between the state, civil society and business in Russia. As an empirical basis the authors use the results of sociological research conducted by Public Opinion Fund in 2015, scientists of the South-Russian Institute of Management Branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration in 2012 and 2016. 44 % of respondents in the regions expressed a preference for the social partnership of government, business and civil society. The authors believe that the implementation of the mission of the Social Contract-2030 is possible through the mechanism of public-private partnership (PPP), which is the most promising and effective institution in modern economicpolitical condition of Russia. The strategic goals of the state consist in providing transfer of the country to the path of innovative development, aimed at reducing the export-resource dependence of the country in the context of the mission of Social Contract-2030 and the national security strategy of the country is impossible without formation of a partnership between the state, companies and commercial structures. Each of the members of the partnership provides a contribution to the implementation of the project. The business structure for its part contributes investment funds, human resources, effective business technologies, flexibility and responsiveness in decision-making, innovation and other private initiatives and available resources. The state in turn provides a partnership through their powers with necessary legal and institutional resources that ensure protective measures for the formation of a competitive and low-risk business. The main task of civil society is to help citizens in solving social problems and the implementation of control over the power structures in the fulfillment of social obligations of the state. The question of increasing the efficiency of mechanisms of Social contract-2030 implementation between the state, society, and business implies transparency of activities of public authorities an d effective management of results.

The formation of Russian liberalism in the 19th century doctrinally followed the path of historically determined development in the context of the Western-centric paradigm. However, political events in Russia at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries made significant adjustments to the further development of liberal ideology. Based on institutional and historical-comparative approaches, a study was conducted of the theoretical heritage of Russian liberalism, its features were noted, and it was proven that the contribution of Russian scientists of the late 19th century can become the basis for developing a strategy for the further development of Russian statehood in the modern geopolitical situation.

The formation of a national-state identity in the sports field is an effective tool for the representation of states and the development of international cooperation through the use of sports as a "soft power". However, the aggressive politicization of the mechanisms of sports competitions leads to the political stigmatization of athletes and national teams regarding their citizenship to the detriment of the traditional principles and values of sport outside of politics. The authors, relying on retrospective, as well as institutional and structur-al-functional approaches, explore the phenomenon of politicization of the mechanisms for developing a national-state identity in the sports sphere, prove that the aggressive politicization of sports replaces the national-state identity with a political one, the line between which is easily erased by political actors. In order to level the destructive politicization of the processes of generation of national-state identity in the sports field, the authors propose comprehensive steps to solve this problem.

The article is devoted to the actual problem of forming a positive image of the state through the use of the media. Foreign policy processes demonstrate the importance of a high-quality collective image of the state as a tool for protecting and promoting one's own interests for the country. The mechanism of influence on the mass consciousness by means of a "symbolic concept" is described, which makes it possible to cover the subjective component of the image of the state, which is inaccessible to the PR-maker.