Suchergebnisse

Modern society is on the stage, which is characterized by new economic and ideological positions. With the development of information in today's world, humanity is moving to a new stage of development, namely the post-industrial society whose core values is information and knowledge. Purpose. Description of industrial society and the definition of stage the development of Ukrainian society today. Results. Physical work is changing by mental work in most developed countries since the 20th century. The intellectual potential of human, her skills and ability is the main resource in the post-industrial society. The representatives of intellectual work are appearing in the job market. These workers are the joint owners and separating gains. It is serving as encouragement to enhance of their creativity. This situation leads to a decent financial reward and improving of material living standards and is a potential incentive for new motivational system. The gained knowledge applied in the production process and provided the main source of added value. It makes the human and her work a basic mechanism of post-industrial economy. The negative factor is the trends in labor migration, namely the departure of skilled workers overseas. Originality. Attempt of Ukrainian society enter into European economic and political space indicates the presence in Ukrainian youth especially creative approach to labor relations on this day. Ukrainians are oriented to individual success, recognition in society, professionalism, competitive and this shows their awareness in construction of post-industrial society. Conclusion. Service industry, recreation and education play a primary role in post-industrial society. Investment in human capital is needed for Ukraine to improve the quality and results of work.

The article analyzes the factors that negatively influence the modernization of Ukrainian society and, in particular, the reformation of its military sphere. Therefore, it is concluded that we need to clarify the content of a number of concepts concerning the status of Ukrainian society, the Russian-Ukrainian war, taking into account the experience of the new independent states. This will enable to form adequate and, if necessary, asymmetric answers to the internal and external challenges facing Ukraine at the present stage. The author proposes that the incentive for the formation of the responses are integrated concept of modernization of all spheres of Ukrainian society. The core of the reform should be the military sphere. It is precisely military reform that will allow a revival of a powerful defense-industrial complex. This, in turn, will contribute to the industrialization of our state. At the same time, as a result of military reform, a "new model of the army" should appear, new approaches to the Russian-Ukrainian war as a whole should emerge.

The relevance of the research is the need to increase the efficiency of managing the innovative culture of society as a mechanism of socio-cultural regulation of innovative human behavior, which is the basis of innovative and favorable environment-higher state, forms the prerequisites for the transition to an innovative path of development. The purpose of the research is to improve and practically test the system of management of the innovative culture of society based on the results of diagnostics of its condition. The theoretical and methodical approach to the diagnostics of the state as a subsystem of purposeful management of innovative culture of society is improved. Diagnostics of the state and dynamics of the development of the innovative culture of Ukraine, as a whole, and its individual components and their elements for the period 2013-2019 (the period of active political and socio-economic transformations) was performed. A set of practical-oriented recommendations for ensuring the proper level of individual elements and constituents of the innovative culture of the Ukrainian society is proposed. It is substantiated that the practical implementation of the obtained results will help to increase the level of innovative culture of society as one of the main elements of formation of an innovative and favorable environment of the state, which, in its turn, creates prerequisites for innovative development of the Ukrainian economy in line with the concept of innovative advancement. The theoretical, methodological and methodical foundations of innovative management at the state level have been deepened in terms of improving the system of diagnostics and management according to its results by developing the innovative culture of society. ; Актуальність дослідження полягає у необхідності підвищення ефективності управляння інноваційною культурою суспільства як механізму соціально-культурного регулювання інноваційної поведінки людини, що є основою інноваційно-сприятливого середовища держави, формує передумови переходу на інноваційний шлях розвитку. Метою дослідження є удосконалення і практична апробація системи управління інноваційною культурою суспіль-ства за результатами діагностики її стану. Удосконалено теоретико-методичний підхід до ді-агностики стану як підсистеми цілеспрямованого управління інноваційною культурою сус-пільства. Виконана діагностика стану і динаміки розвитку інноваційної культури України як у цілому, так і за окремими її складовими та їх елементами за період 2013-2019 рр. (період активних політичних та соціально-економічних трансформацій). Запропоновано комплекс практично-орієнтованих рекомендацій щодо забезпечення належного рівня окремих елемен-тів і складових підсистем інноваційної культури українського суспільства. Обґрунтовано, що практична реалізація отриманих результатів сприятиме підвищенню рівня інноваційної культури суспільства як одного з головних елементів формування інноваційно-сприятливого середовища держави, що, в свою чергу, створює передумови інноваційного розвитку економіки України в руслі концепції інноваційного випередження. Поглиблено теоретико-методологічні і методичні засади інноваційного менеджменту на рівні держави в частині удосконалення системи діагностики і управління за її результатами розвитком інноваційної культури суспільства.

The article is devoted to the current situation in Ukrainian society´s political culture, where there are several segments that give grounds for a statement about the fragmentary type of political culture. First, it focuses on foreign experience, in particular in countries of Europe and America. Absolutizing their experience is not enough to shape democratic values in Ukrainian society.Keywords: policy, political culture, citizens, tolerance.

Regarding the Soviet past, idea of the dichotomous nature of Ukrainian historical memory is widespread both in society and in academia. According to it, two models of memory are widespread in Ukrainian society — the Ukrainian national memory and the Soviet one as the opposed to it. The article shows that this view is simplified. The Ukrainian national and Soviet models of memory are not a dichotomy but a continuum. Based on the analysis of sociological surveys, a number of versions have been identified within each of the memory models. In particular, within the Ukrainian national model there are such versions as: "resistance", "realitistic", "post-Soviet". The difference between them lies in the attitude towards the Soviet past. In the "resistance" version the Soviet past is completely rejected, in the "realitistic" version it is perceived as an integral part of the Ukrainian past, and in the "post-Soviet" version there is a mechanistic combination of Soviet and Ukrainian national narratives, with an emphasis on the Ukrainian component. Within the Soviet model there are such versions as: "Ukrainian", "fraternal peoples", and "reunification". The criterion for distinguishing them is the attitude to the Ukrainian historical narrative. In the case of the "Ukrainian" version, there is a combination of Soviet and Ukrainian narratives, but with an emphasis on the Soviet component. In the "fraternal peoples'" version the Ukrainian identity is seen as equal to the Russian one and as the "reunification". And in the "reunification" version Ukrainian identity is seen as a part of supranational identity. Also four types of historical memory are distinguished by the criterion of combining models within individual consciousness. Two of them are "pure" — Ukrainian national and Soviet-imperial, and two are "mixed" — ambivalent, where two models are combined, and indefinite, where none of the memory models is important to individuals. The article also analyzes the regional prevalence of both memory models and types.

The Euromaidan revolution was the start of a process of profound change in Ukrainian identity. Russian aggression has completed this turn to a pro-Western, anti-Russian orientation.