Unit Costs in Recreational Facilities
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 62, Heft 1, S. 140-147
ISSN: 1552-3349
6194 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 62, Heft 1, S. 140-147
ISSN: 1552-3349
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 62, S. 140-147
ISSN: 0002-7162
In: Socio-economic planning sciences: the international journal of public sector decision-making, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 27-30
ISSN: 0038-0121
In: Public money & management: integrating theory and practice in public management, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 58-62
ISSN: 1467-9302
In: International Journal of Public Sector Management, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 130-149
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to create a framework in which the behaviour of unit costs in public sector outsourcing situations can be analysed.Design/methodology/approachExplorative case study concentrating on theory building.FindingsPublic sector organisations have not concentrated on analysing or modelling the unit cost behaviour in outsourcing situations. The lack of systematic cost management tools seems to lead to poorly managed and non‐profitable outsourcing projects or ignorance of the possibilities of outsourcing.Practical implicationsBy utilising the results of the study, decision making regarding outsourcing in public sector could be based both on forecast cost development and on political judgement instead of relying only on political judgement without understanding cost behaviour.Originality/valueThe paper introduces a new framework to be used as a tool in practice and to be validated in further studies.
In: American economic review, Band 89, Heft 2, S. 328-332
ISSN: 1944-7981
In: International journal of public sector management: IJPSM, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 130-149
ISSN: 0951-3558
In: The current digest of the Soviet press: publ. each week by The Joint Committee on Slavic Studies, Band 29, S. 19
ISSN: 0011-3425
In: Journal of labor research, Band 16, Heft 3, S. 367-377
ISSN: 1936-4768
In: Its Accounting publication series no. 11-2
Various comments either support or rejection made by the hospital since the introduction of INA-CBGs tariff of theNational Health Insurance (JKN) in January of 2014. Some hospitals complained about the unfairness of tariff s that areconsidered inconsistent with the real cost of health services. INA-CBGs tariff s are subject to regulations. reviewed atleast every two years. The Government evaluates and revises the tariff s determined based on Unit cost (UC) calculationsand takes into account various aspects. The results showed that in general UC calculation result with step down methodfor inpatient and outpatient service at 84 Public Hospital BLU / BLUD is lower than INA-CBGs Tariff . It can be concludedthat the implementation of INA-CBG tariff s still meet the sense of justice and can be applied. It is recommended that thetariff review also takes into account the UC change and global / regional / national economic conditions so it should notbe done every two years. On the other hand, hospitals need to manage INA-CBGs health services fi nancing effi cientlyin order to maintain the quality of service and to meet the patients demand. ABSTRAK Berbagai komentar baik dukungan ataupun penolakan dilontarkan pihak rumah sakit (RS) sejak diberlakukan tarif INACBGs pada tahun 2014 dalam Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN). Sebagian RS mengeluhkan ketidak adilan besarantarif yang dianggap tidak sesuai dengan biaya riil pelayanan kesehatan. Tarif INA-CBGs sesuai peraturan. ditinjau minimalsetiap dua tahun. Pemerintah melakukan evaluasi dan revisi terhadap Tarif yang ditetapkan berdasar atas perhitunganUnit cost (UC) serta memperhitungkan berbagai aspek terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara umum hasilperhitungan UC dengan metode step down untuk pelayanan rawat inap, dan rawat jalan di 84 RS Umum BLU/BLUD lebihrendah dari Tarif INA-CBGs. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa pemberlakuan tarif INA-CBG masih memenuhi rasa keadilandan dapat diterapkan. Direkomendasikan agar peninjauan tarif disamping memperhitungkan perubahan UC juga kondisiekonomi global/regional/nasional sehingga dapat dilakukan sesuai kebutuhan dan tidak harus dilakukan setiap dua tahun.Di pihak lain. RS perlu mengelola pembiayaan INA-CBGs untuk pelayanan kesehatan secara efi sien agar dapat menjagamutu pelayanan sesuai harapan masyarakat.
BASE
Sistem biaya pendidikan merupakan proses di mana pendapatan dan sumber daya tersedia digunakan untuk memformulasikan dan mengoperasionalkan sekolah. Sistem biaya pendidikan sangat bervariasi tergantung dari kondisi masing-masing negara seperti kondisi geografis, tingkat pendidikan, kondisi politik pendidikan, hukum pendidikan, ekonomi pendidikan, program pembiayaan pemerintah dan administrasi sekolah. Setiap keputusan dalam masalah pembiayaan sekolah akan mempengaruhi bagaimana sumber daya diperoleh dan dialokasikan. Oleh karena itu perlu dilihat siapa yang akan dididik dan seberapa banyak jasa pendidikan dapat disediakan, bagaimana mereka akan di didik, siapa yang akan membayar biaya pendidikan. Hal itu perlu dilihat dari faktor kebutuhan dan ketersediaan pendidikan, tanggung jawab orang tua dalam menyekolahkan versus social benefit secara luas, pengaruh faktor politik dan ekonomi terhadap sektor pendidikan. Kata Kunci : Sistem Biaya Pendidikan, Konsep Produksi Di Bidang Pendidikan
BASE
In: Journal of political economy, Band 29, Heft 8, S. 663-675
ISSN: 1537-534X
In: FRB Atlanta Working Paper No. 2021-12B
SSRN