Suchergebnisse

In the article the author offers a brief sketch of the history and different meanings of criticism as they were formed over the last three centuries. He points out the original meaning of the usage of the term and then points to the narrower meaning, especially that found in art criticism. He then claims that a large portion of art criticism has retained its essence and meaning unchanged since its beginning and that this is also true insofar as it has not changed when art is compared with new media and Chinese art. The author also notes that art criticism represents an important constituent part of art proper. ; V svojem članku prikaže avtor kratek potek zgodovine in različnih pomenov kritike kot so se ti oblikovali skozi zadnja tri stoletja. Pokaže na izvorni pomen tega izraza ter nato na razvoj kritike v angleškem družbenem, kulturnem in političnem prostoru, kjer je kritika vedno bolj postajala kulturna kritika. Opozori na njun današnji pomen. Čeprav je kritika danes izgubila jasno vsebino, to ni zmanjšalo njene tehtnosti in pomena pa naj je šlo za kritiko novih medijev ali kitajske umetnosti. Avtor tudi opozori, da tvori umetnostna kritika pomembno konstituanto umetnosti kot take.

This volume presents a collection of collaborations and conversations between archaeological, contemporary art, and heritage practitioners. Departing from the proceedings of the Sixth World Archaeological Congress's 'Archaeologies of Art' theme and Ábhar agus Meon exhibitions, it includes papers by seminal figures as well as experimental work by those who are exploring the application of artistic methods and theories to the practice of archaeology. Art and Archaeology: Collaborations, Conversations, Criticisms encourages the creative interplay of various approaches to 'art' and 'archaeology' as contributions to how we interpret and understand the world. Established topics such as cave art, monumental architecture and land art will be discussed alongside treatments of modern and contemporary drawing, installation art, performance art, photography, sculpture, and video art. Here, the parallel roles of artists as makers of worlds and archaeologists as makers of pasts are brought together in an appreciation of human creativity

The purpose of the article is a theoretical under-standing of the conceptual sphere of "heroic" cinema-tography as a genre formation. The subject of research in this article is the conceptual sphere of "heroic" cinematography.
The research methodology is based on the morpho-logical approach in art criticism and those ideas in the theory of film studies, which are contained in the works of H. Batalina, V. Horpenko, R. Cohen and others. We use the idea of V. Horpenko that "the specified problems of terminology demonstrate the complexity of their solution, and, in the end, from many options, you need to take one general direction, which should determine the system-forming methodology" (Horpenko, 2013, p. 77), it is the morphological approach that is the system-forming methodology for the subject of our research. Methodological approaches of Ukrainian media studies researchers outlined in the study "Media studies in the European integration discourse of Ukraine" are also used (Media studies, 2022).
The result of the research presented in this article. 1. Formation of the conceptual sphere of a specific scientific problem is a necessary and multifaceted pro-cess. It requires not only the definition of the "title" research concepts, but also the levels of their use as scientific tools. 2. The basic principles of the formation of the conceptual sphere of the "heroic" film research are outlined and the semantic connections of the "title" concepts "hero" and "heroism" with the subject of the study are defined. The levels and vectors of the use of these concepts as a working toolkit for the study of "heroic" cinematography are characterized. 3. The polymorphism of "heroic" cinematography as a special morphological formation of modern cinematography is indicated.
The scientific novelty of the study lies in the understanding of the basic principles of the existence of the conceptual sphere of the study of "heroic" cinematography as the newest polymorphic formation of Ukrainian cinematography.
The practical significance of the results of the study based on the intelligent use of the specified scientific tools in the future research of modern Ukrainian cinematography.

"This book takes up the problem of judging works of art using moral standards. When we say that a work is racist, or morally dangerous, what do we mean? The book is divided into two parts. The first part takes up the moral question on its own. What could it mean to say that a work of art (rather than, say, a human being) is immoral? The second part steps back and asks about how moral evaluation fits into the larger task of evaluating artworks. If an artwork is immoral, what does that tell us about how to value the artwork? The overall approach of the book is moderately skeptical. The book argues that many of the reasons given for thinking that works of art are immoral do not stand up to careful scrutiny. It further tries to show that even when works of art are rightly condemned from a moral point of view, the relationship between that moral flaw and their value as artworks is complex. The book defends a moderate version of autonomism between morality and aesthetics. But the real purpose of the book is to highlight the complexities and difficulties in evaluating artworks morally - many philosophers of art have simply assumed that artworks can be evaluated morally and proceeded as though such assessments were unproblematic"--