Women's Status and Social Capital in the United States
In: Journal of women, politics & policy, Band 27, Heft 1-2, S. 69-84
ISSN: 1554-4788
802391 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of women, politics & policy, Band 27, Heft 1-2, S. 69-84
ISSN: 1554-4788
In: Women & politics, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 69-84
In: Melbourne Institute working paper 11,12
The claim that marriage is a venue for status exchange of achieved traits, like education, and ascribed attributes, notably race and ethnic membership, has regained traction in the social stratification literature. Most studies that consider status exchanges ignore birthplace as a social boundary for status exchanges via couple formation. This paper evaluates the status exchange hypothesis for Australia and the United States, two Anglophone nations with long immigration traditions whose admission regimes place different emphases on skills. A log-linear analysis reveals evidence of status exchange in the United States among immigrants with lower levels of education and mixed nativity couples with foreign-born husbands. Partly because Australian educational boundaries are less sharply demarcated at the postsecondary level, we find is weaker evidence for the status exchange hypothesis. Australian status exchanges across nativity boundaries usually involve marriages between immigrant spouses with a postsecondary credential below a college degree and native-born high school graduates. -- status exchange ; immigration ; educational assortative mating
In: Current population reports; special studies. Series P-23 no. 38
In: BLS report no. 394
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 97, Heft 2, S. 496-523
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Current population reports : Special studies : Series P-23 no. 54
In: Ageing international, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 35-40
ISSN: 1936-606X
SSRN
Working paper
In: Current population reports; special studies. Series P-23 no. 42
In: A U. S. Department of Commerce Publication
In: Current population reports; special studies. Series P-23 no. 48
In: Social Sciences, Band 10, Heft 5, S. 182
ISSN: 2076-0760
In high-income, low-fertility (HILF) settings, the mother's partner is a key provider of childcare. However, it is not clear how mothers without partners draw on other sources of support to raise children. This paper reports the findings from a survey of 1532 women in the United Kingdom and the United States, in which women described who provided childcare for a focal child and how frequently they did so. We use multivariate Bayesian regression models to explore the drivers of support from partners, maternal kin, and other allomothers, as well as the potential impact of allomothering on women's fertility. Relative to mothers who are in a stable first marriage or cohabitation, mothers who are unpartnered rely more heavily on fewer maternal kin, use more paid help, and have networks which include more non-kin helpers. Repartnered mothers received less help from their partners in the UK and less help from maternal kin in both countries, which US mothers compensated for by relying on other helpers. While repartnered mothers had higher age-adjusted fertility than women in a first partnership, allomaternal support was not clearly related to the mother's fertility. These findings demonstrate the importance of partners but also of allomothering more broadly in HILF settings.