Suchergebnisse

Modern Society as a Complex Dynamic System is Affected by Unforeseen Fluctuations. By Historical Standards, the Recent Introduction of the Nonlinear Approach into the Scientific World Picture put the Classical Understanding of Space and Time to the Obstruction. Consequently, there Appeared the Problem of Human Adaptation and his Worldview to the Asserting Complexity of the Society

This article gives a brief overview over the development of government research. The initial governance research was mainly state-centric, later to be followed by research departing from societal complexity. These two approaches are now beginning to gel, producing a research agenda focused on the changing role of the state and the role of networks in the process of governing. Adapted from the source document.

Von der metatheoretischen Erörterung der Rolle des Technologie- wie des Gesellschaftskonzepts in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Theorie und der kurzen Skizzierung sozialrevolutionärer Ansätze schreitet der Autor zu einer Analyse der Interdependenz von technologischer Innovation und sozialem Wandel. (BIOst-Hml)

"Social Complexity, Crisis, and Management" published on by Oxford University Press.

"Superdiversity explores processes of diversification and the complex, emergent social configurations that now supersede prior forms of diversity in societies around the world. Migration plays a key role in these processes, bringing changes not just in social, cultural, religious and linguistic phenomena, but also in the ways that these phenomena combine with others like gender, age and legal status. The concept of superdiversity has been adopted by scholars across the social sciences in order to address a variety of forms, modes and outcomes of diversification. Central to this field is the relationship between social categorization and social organization, including stratification and inequality. Increasingly complex categories of social "difference" have significant impacts across scales, from entire societies to individual identities. While diversification is often met with simplifying stereotypes, threat narratives, and expressions of antagonism, superdiversity encourages a perspective on difference as comprising multiple social processes, flexible collective meanings, and overlapping personal and group identities. A superdiversity approach encourages the re-evaluation and recognition of social categories as multidimensional, unfixed and porous as opposed to views based on hardened, one-dimensional thinking about groups. Diversification and increasing social complexity are bound to continue, if not intensify, in light of climate change. This will have profound impacts on the nature of global migration, social relations and inequalities. Superdiversity presents a convincing case for recognizing new social formations created by changing migration patterns and calls for a re-thinking of public policy and social scientific approaches to social difference. This introduction to the multidisciplinary concept of superdiversity will be of considerable interest to students and researchers in a range of fields in the humanities and social sciences"--

Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- List of figures -- List of tables -- Acknowledgements -- 1. Introduction -- Social complexity -- Complex systems thinking -- Complex systems thinking in archaeology -- Structure of the book -- 2. The history of complexity in archaeology -- Introduction -- Social evolution -- Urbanisation and state formation -- Systems thinking and complexity -- Complex systems thinking -- 3. Conceptualising social complexity -- Introduction -- Building blocks of social complexity -- Complexity formation -- Outcomes of complexity -- Multi-scalar dynamics of change and stability -- 4. Social complexity trajectories in Anatolia -- Introduction -- Case study: Social complexity in Anatolia -- 5. Conclusions -- Reflections on the case study -- Reflections on the conceptual model -- Reflections on the future -- Bibliography -- Index.

In this article, the author argues that complexity theories have limited use in the study of society, and that social processes are too complex and particular to be rigorously modeled in complexity terms. Theories of social complexity are shown to be inadequately developed, and typical weaknesses in the literature on social complexity are discussed. Two stronger analyses, of Luhmann and of Harvey and Reed, are also critically considered. New considerations regarding social complexity are advanced, on the lines that simplicity, complexity that can be modeled, and incondensible complexity permeate society simultaneously. The difficulty of establishing complexity models for processes involving ongoing interpretation is discussed. It is argued that the notions of system and environment need recasting in social studies. Existing social studies and literature, it is argued, reflect a polymorphous, contextual, contingent, labyrinthine, dramatic and political face to social complexity. Students of social complexity must be literate in such studies.