Inflation and stabilization policies
In: CEPAL review, Band 1986, Heft 28, S. 67-97
ISSN: 1684-0348
2250 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: CEPAL review, Band 1986, Heft 28, S. 67-97
ISSN: 1684-0348
In: CEPAL review, Band 28, S. 67-97
ISSN: 0251-2920
Pocas cuestiones han sido tan discutidas, desde perspectivas teoricas y practicas, como la inflacion. Sin embargo la controversia persiste. Este articulo se propone comentar estos debates, senalando algunos de los problemas destacados en el analisis de las causas y consecuencias de la inflacion y en el diseno de politicas de estabilizacion. En la parte final se examina brevemente el Plan Austral, aplicado en la Argentina desde mediados de 1985
World Affairs Online
In: Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Band 53, Heft 2, S. 187-198
ISSN: 1467-8292
In: Revue économique, Band 25, Heft 5, S. 862
ISSN: 1950-6694
In: The Canadian Journal of Economics, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 454
In: The Economic Journal, Band 83, Heft 329, S. 277
In: European journal of political economy, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 853-875
ISSN: 0176-2680
This paper studies the effects of a stabilization program based on a reduction in the devaluation rate in an optimizing model with capital controls, minimum wages for unskilled labor, an informal sector, & public production of intermediate inputs. Perfect mobility across sectors of the unskilled labor force prevents the emergence of unemployment for that category of labor, but skilled unemployment prevails in equilibrium. The analysis highlights the role of endogenous labor market segmentation in assessing the wage & employment effects of stabilization policies. 4 Figures, 1 Appendix, 19 References. Adapted from the source document.
The present paper describes recent research on two central themes of Keynes General Theory: (i) the social waste associated with recessions, and (ii) the effectiveness of fiscal policy as a stabilization tool. The paper also discusses some evidence on the extent to which fiscal policy has been used as a stabilizing tool in industrial economies over the past two decades.
BASE
In: Carnegie Rochester conference series on public policy 28
In: Mirovaja ėkonomika i meždunarodnye otnošenija: MĖMO, Heft 5, S. 27-38
Seemingly, the experience of Latin American countries in the crisis period and before may be useful for Russia to address its highly essential tasks of the countercyclical policy improvement, investment climate enhancement, the reduction of state's direct participation in economy, raising of the banking system efficiency and competitiveness. Such experience will be significant to achieve optimal economic criteria for passing on to the inflation targeting principle.
This paper tackles the question of the compatibility of public market stabilization instruments with the WTO rules applied to developing countries. We shall first examine the three pillars of the 1994 Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) (border protection, export regulation, and domestic support measures), then we shall examine whether Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) and the current negotiations make it possible to take into account international price volatility better than the AoA.
BASE
What has been done? Government intervention in marketing and the major production areas has been increasing since independence in 1960, through the early 1970s. From 1973 to 1977, state-run companies controlled all downstream marketing activities. From 1980 to 1990, the government gradually withdrew. Structural adjustment policies were accompanied by the rehabilitation of irrigation systems, which came under the management of water user associations. During the 2000s, policies aimed at increasing domestic supply through production support and regulation of urban supply through imports. How has it been implemented? Until the late 70s, government intervention took the form of land development corporations in two of the main rice production areas. The government also intervened through parastatals, which had a monopoly over the purchase and distribution of rice, and set prices for both producers and consumers. After liberalization, state intervention focused on setting import levies (with rates ranging from 30% to 0%) and ad hoc initiatives like facilitating imports during crises. Efforts to increase production included investment in irrigation infrastructure (rehabilitation), intensification incentives based on access to inputs (such as recent efforts to encourage off-season rice), and incentives to expand rainfed production through access to mechanization. Microcredit has also expanded significantly, to finance production and storage. Starting in 2005, the government implemented two innovative instruments to improve the management of the sector: an observatory and a consultative mechanism to encourage dialogue between the government and industry players. What were the effects? The centralizing policies of the 70s completely destroyed marketing channels and producers' interest in the market. Availability per capita fell (from 200 kg to 125 kg/per capita between 1970 and 2000) and imports increased. Since 2002, production levels have shown a marked increase, and starting in 2005, fluctuations in consumer prices stabilized, despite a troubled national and international context. What recommendations could be derived? The period of total government control was catastrophic the recover long. The recent positive developments in the rice sector are partly the fruit of production support and infrastructure development efforts (irrigation and transportation), and partly due to a new form of governance that relies on wellinformed decision-makers and public-private coordination. However, multi-stakeholder dialogue has not eliminated the unequal balance of power: measures (including price stabilization) are taken more in the interest of urban consumers than the protection of producers. (Texte intégral)
BASE