Rights and Left-Overs
In: British journal of visual impairment: BJVI, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 46-47
ISSN: 1744-5809
6307727 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: British journal of visual impairment: BJVI, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 46-47
ISSN: 1744-5809
In: Journal of contemporary history, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 183-197
ISSN: 1461-7250
In: Telos, Heft 103, S. 181-188
ISSN: 0040-2842, 0090-6514
Surveys various attempts to move beyond the categories of Left & Right in making distinctions in political orientations among social groups. It is argued that the work of such scholars as Giovanni Sartori (1982), Norberto Bobbio (1983), & Dino Confrancesco (1984) ends in essentializing these categories rather than creating viable alternatives. Moreover, to the extent that these categorizations function as ideal-types within theoretical constructs wholly devised by the authors, they do not correspond to empirical reality. These authors therefore risk losing themselves within the many varieties of Right & Left that they inevitably observe as they turn to empirical questions. A call is made to overcome rigid metapolitical frameworks devised in the nineteenth century that do not capture the political reality of the late twentieth century. D. M. Smith
In: Patterns of prejudice: a publication of the Institute for Jewish Policy Research and the American Jewish Committee, Band 6, Heft 4, S. 22-23
ISSN: 1461-7331
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 35, Heft 6, S. 841-851
ISSN: 1467-9221
Research recently published in Political Psychology suggested that political intolerance is more strongly predicted by political conservatism than liberalism. Our findings challenge that conclusion. Participants provided intolerance judgments of several targets and the political objective of these targets (left-wing vs. right-wing) was varied between subjects. Across seven judgments, conservatism predicted intolerance of left-wing targets, while liberalism predicted intolerance of right-wing targets. These relationships were fully mediated by perceived threat from targets. Moreover, participants were biased against directly opposing political targets: conservatives were more intolerant of a left-wing target than the opposing right-wing target (e.g., pro-gay vs. anti-gay rights activists), while liberals were more intolerant of a right-wing target than the opposing left-wing target. These findings are discussed within the context of the existing political intolerance and motivated reasoning literatures. Adapted from the source document.
In: Political psychology: journal of the International Society of Political Psychology, Band 35, Heft 6, S. 841-851
ISSN: 1467-9221
Research recently published in Political Psychology suggested that political intolerance is more strongly predicted by political conservatism than liberalism. Our findings challenge that conclusion. Participants provided intolerance judgments of several targets and the political objective of these targets (left‐wing vs. right‐wing) was varied between subjects. Across seven judgments, conservatism predicted intolerance of left‐wing targets, while liberalism predicted intolerance of right‐wing targets. These relationships were fully mediated by perceived threat from targets. Moreover, participants were biased against directly opposing political targets: conservatives were more intolerant of a left‐wing target than the opposing right‐wing target (e.g., pro‐gay vs. anti‐gay rights activists), while liberals were more intolerant of a right‐wing target than the opposing left‐wing target. These findings are discussed within the context of the existing political intolerance and motivated reasoning literatures.
In: The Salisbury review: a quarterly magazine of conservative thought, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 29-30
ISSN: 0265-4881
In: Telos: critical theory of the contemporary, Band 1995, Heft 103, S. 181-188
ISSN: 1940-459X
In: World Marxist review: problems of peace and socialism, Band 19, S. 66-74
ISSN: 0043-8642
This book outlines significant traits of radical leftist identity politics. In this type of discourse, arguments are organized around global friend/enemy schemes in ways that are at odds with the right/left matrix of democracy. This is shown by combining discourse analysis of how leftist critics argue in public debates centred on their reactions to the Charlie Hebdo massacre in 2015 and theoretical discussions on leftist identity politics orbiting around Schmitt, Marcuse and Mouffe. It is argued that the friend/enemy approach sacrifices the egalitarian and libertarian core values of the Left
In: Al-Raida Journal, S. 23
Unheard Voices / Both Right and Left Handed
In: Psychotherapy and Politics, S. 14-21
In: The new leader: a biweekly of news and opinion, Band 81, S. 6-8
ISSN: 0028-6044
Examines efforts to find an opposition party capable of challenging the dominant Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) in the 2000 elections; includes the right-wing National Action Party (PAN), and the left-wing Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD).
In: The Indian economic and social history review: IESHR, Band 11, Heft 2-3, S. 216-259
ISSN: 0973-0893