In: Robert L. Navin, "Proceedings of the Ieee/Iafe 1999 Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (Cifer): March 28-30, 1999 New York City", pp198-218, publ. IEEE 1999 (& 2004).
Violence and threats of violence in the family are a current worldwide problem, which has been given increased attention during the last twenty years. In the process of research and analysis of legislation on the provisional protection against violence, a number of deficiencies and inaccuracies in the laws and regulations are identified which unduly delay and preclude the full achievement of the goals set by this legal mechanism. In order to understand the significance of provisional protection against violence, it is necessary to clarify the nature of the provisional protection against violence in family legal relations by identifying the fundamental human rights that are protected or affected and limited in the process of application of provisional protection against violence. In order to attain the objective pursued in the work, an analysis has been carried out of the existing legislation that determine the means of protection in civil law, their application procedure, as well as legal consequences.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) rendered a decision regarding supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for plant protection products and provisional marketing authorisation. The ECJ clarified that SPCs for patented plant protection products may also be based on provisional marketing authorizations pursuant to Article 8(1) Directive 91/114 (author's headnote).