The progressive movement of 1912 and third party movement of 1924 in Maine
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/osu.32435005034780
The Maine bulletin. Vol. xxxv, no. 5. ; Bibliography: p. 64-66. ; Mode of access: Internet.
8758 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/osu.32435005034780
The Maine bulletin. Vol. xxxv, no. 5. ; Bibliography: p. 64-66. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uva.x000363798
Mode of access: Internet. ; ALDERMAN: With: Status of the social sciences in secondary schools of Main / Frieda Wardwell Hatch. 1933 -- Woody plants for landscape planting in Maine / Roger Clapp. 1933. -- History of secondary education in York and Oxford counties in Main / John Coffey Hylan. 1933. -- Novels of William Hurrell Mallock / Amy Belle Adams. 1934. ; 14 ; 1:AS 36 .M3 2d ser. no.26 2nd ser. no.26-30 1933-1934
BASE
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015008483151
"*Thirty-two pages are here added for full page half-tone illustrations not heretofore numbered." ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: Modern American history
In: A Garland series
Caption title. ; Florida Atlantic University Libraries' Marvin and Sybil Weiner Spirit of America Collection, Pamphlets: Speeches B24F20 ; Florida Atlantic Digital Library Collections
BASE
"The author examines the presidential election of 1912 in detail and traces the effects of Roosevelt's actions on the Republican Party for decades. Appendices detail Republican primary results, all parties' platforms and both attempted and successful presidential assassinations"--
In: Journal of progressive human services, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 160-190
ISSN: 1540-7616
In: Studies in American political development: SAPD, Band 8, Heft 2, S. 282-340
ISSN: 1469-8692
During the 1992 presidential contest, the press and pundits alike characterized the challenge posed by H. Ross Perot and the political organization he created, United We Stand America, as the most significant assault on the two-party system since Theodore Roosevelt's Bull Moose Campaign. In one sense, this comparison is more penetrating than these observers imagined, for the impressive showing of Perot was emblematic of the candidate-centered, plebiscitary electoral politics that Roosevelt and the Progressive party championed in 1912. Given that Perot ran without partisan attachments and refused to cede authority to the rank and file of a new reform movement, however, the allusion has proven to be as ephemeral as the public opinion polls it relies on. The Progressive party was born during the 1912 election as more than an aegis for Roosevelt's ample desire for power; it embodied the aspirations of reformers whose quest for a vehicle of political, social, and industrial transformation was at least a dozen years old.
In: Studies in history and government 3
In: University of Maine studies ser. 2, no. 26
In: The Maine bulletin 35,5
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 338-339
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: Current History, Band 20, Heft 5, S. 840-841
ISSN: 1944-785X
In: Heritage
A striking and significant phenomenon of the Canadian political scene immediately following World War I was the rise and fall of a third party. Professor Morton describes and analyses the background and political history of this movement, and gives a graphic description of western economy and politics generally which will assist all readers towards a better understanding of the Canadian west and its problems.The Progress party represented essentially an agrarian revolt against what western Canada considered to be Canadian economic policy and Canadian political practice. As seen through western eyes, our economic policy at the same seemed a metropolitan economy, designed by control of tariffs, railways, and credit to draw wealth from the hinterland and countryside into the industrial and commercial centre of Canada. Political practice appeared in much the same light. The classic national parties took on the guise of instruments used by the vested interests of metropolitan Canada to implement this national policy. Distrust and dissatisfaction mounted over the first twenty years of the century and impetus for independent political action on the part of the farmers increased proportionately.While the western grievances were shelved during World War I, party lines were weakened by the coming to power of the Union Government, and allegiance in the west was easily turned away from the unsatisfying traditional parties after the Union Government was defeated. By 1919-20, organized farmer groups were definitely committed to a programme of political action