Suchergebnisse

The noted remarkable capacity of the Gulf ruling families to mobilise external and internal sources of power seems to have reached its limits. Gulf rulers also seem aware that they have lost the advantages associated with their special regional role throughout the Cold War era. The geo-political context within which they have operated has altered throughout the 1990s. Furthermore, decades of economic mismanagement, endemic corruption and wasteful expenditure have greatly reduced the basis of their infrastructural powers. The effects of fluctuating oil revenues have exasperated the financial woes of the Gulf monarchies and their domestic and foreign debts. This paper is an attempt to put succession issues in the text of the emerging new order in the Gulf region. It also considers how this evolving situation may become more precarious in light of the unresolved succession issues in all the Gulf monarchies. Politically ambitious members of domestic elite groups as well as disgruntled factions of each ruling family may find in these developments new political opportunities to improve their political positions. The ruling families of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are already experiencing pains of searching for successors to their ageing monarchs. While Bahrain, Qatar and the UAE, and most of its constituent Emirates, do not face immediate pressures of replacing their reigning monarchs, they must grapple with other fallouts of succession problems and family feuds. And, finally, there is Oman whose childless monarch, though relatively young, has yet to publicly name a successor. 2005 – WS 13 – Khalaf 22 pages

It is sometimes stated that the question of state succession to treaties is a question more of treaty interpretation than of the existence or otherwise of general rules of law concerning the fate of treaties upon change of sovereignty. In general terms the proposition is true: a customary rule favoring or negativing devolution would tend to be either excessively comprehensive or excessively restrictive with respect to the category of treaties whose fate is in issue. Many treaties, upon interpretation, might be found to be inapplicable under the new circumstances, while many others might be deliberately drafted in anticipation of a change of sovereignty, and might incorporate a clause providing for the solution of the problem. A study of concrete issues is thus, generally, more instructive in determining the effect of change of sovereignty upon treaties than is the enunciation of general principles of succession.

At present, in the formation and implementation of a national scientific policy, public authorities use information on the personnel potential of the domestic research and development sector, obtained through state statistics. In the article we systematize and show by examples main shortcomings of such a source of information. Use of scientometric methods of assessment of research staff capacity and efficiency, based on actual data on the research performance of individual scientists, entire organizations, and regions is recommended in order to arrive at a more objective picture of the scientific landscape.