Suchergebnisse

First published, 1881. ; Electronic text and image data ; Mode of access: Internet.

Vols. 2-3 have imprint: Chicago, M.B. Cary, 1883-4. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Of this edition, v. 1 published in 1890, v. 2 in 1889, v. 3 in 1888. ; First published 1881. ; Mode of access: Internet.

The state of the economy is said to shape election results, with incumbents doing well if it's up, and badly if its down, but what is the economy?

China's contemporary political economy is among the most exciting and demanding frontiers of research in comparative politics. The country's sheer size and internal diversity offer a natural laboratory for examining topics at multiple levels and units of analysis, and in varied regional environments. China's salience in the international media and business community also presents scholars with the added opportunity (and even responsibility) for clarifying popular misconceptions through original empirical research. An abundance of research possibilities is accompanied by a ready audience of nonacademic consumers.

The 26th UN Climate Change Conference, COP26, will take place in Glasgow in November. Can it succeed? What does 'success' actually mean in the context of the climate crisis?

The public's health is intimately linked to politics and policy. But political science has yet to make a major contribution to understanding the political economy of health (as distinct from medical care). In order to advance understanding of the drivers of health in an era of emerging infectious disease and global pandemics, more political scientists must begin to do what we are uniquely well situated to do: analyze in a contextualized way the pathways and mechanisms through which power configurations cause illness and inequity. This article reviews key findings from recent literature about the policy, political, and structural contributors to population health and health equity and sketches what a political economy of health more deeply rooted in political science could look like.

How does the evolution of global capitalism shape patterns and processes of migration? How does migration in turn shape and intersect with the forces at work in the global economy? How should we understand the relationship between migration and development, and how is migration connected with patterns of poverty and inequality? How are processes of migration and immigration governed in different parts of the world? The authors of Migration in the Global Political Economy tackle these questions in a set of engaging and authoritative chapters. Mobilizing the core insights of critical IPE scholarship and combining analysis of the big picture with attention to particular regions, countries, and actors, the authors seek to bring the increasingly important processes of migration to the center of inquiries into globalization and its social underpinnings

The duality of approach that characterizes teaching International Political Economy(IPE) & Comparative Political Economy(CPE) in American universities is explored in terms of positive political economy versus structuralist approaches to argue that the disciplinary field as strongly defined by questions & texts of 15-25 years ago. A comparative review of 36 syllabi of IPE & CPE identifies the general definition as an "intertwining of politics & economics", & the primary dividing line as geographic scale. Analysis of IPE characterizes the field as dominated by several versions of the state centric approach which share a common empirical core with a liberal tenor, a thematic prevalence of hegemonic stability theory (HST) & protectionism, & a sidelining of the sectoral politics of money that is a failure to present rival theoretic explanations. The less prevalent CPE field presents a "varieties of capitalism" framework or a more liberal oriented thematic approach that share an empirical core of relative economic performance, divergent state institutional structure, & a common comparative approach. Increased mutual exchange is asserted to benefit the IPE & CPE fields, as well as a closer engagement with political economy outside political science to embrace the multidisciplinary promise of the 1970's as Marx' moral science. References. J. Harwell