History Among Other Social Sciences
In: Social Sciences (Minneapolis), Band 39, Heft 3, S. 28-42
2871549 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Social Sciences (Minneapolis), Band 39, Heft 3, S. 28-42
SSRN
In: A New Handbook of Political Science, S. 97-130
In: Economic theory, econometrics, and mathematical economics
In: Contributions to Indian sociology, Band 35, Heft 3, S. 389-399
ISSN: 0973-0648
In: The Economic Journal, Band 92, Heft 368, S. 972
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 12, Heft 6, S. 739-755
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16115
SSRN
In: Social science history: the official journal of the Social Science History Association, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 199-200
ISSN: 1527-8034
In this issue of Social Science History we begin a special series of articles surveying the impact and use of historical research and reasoning in the other social sciences—anthropology, economics, geography, political science, and sociology. The authors of the essays have been asked to analyze their disciplines so that readers will get a sense both of major issues and research directions and of influences. In addition, they have been asked to include in their references older important works as well as more recent ones, so that those in other disciplines may use the essays as bibliographic sources. After the series is completed, we expect to publish an expanded version of it as a separate book.
In: Estudios económicos, Band 2, Heft 3/4, S. 82-87
ISSN: 2525-1295
MACHLUP, Fritz. Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences
In: Thesis eleven: critical theory and historical sociology, Band 175, Heft 1, S. 3-26
ISSN: 1461-7455, 0725-5136
This paper starts with the observation that at least for the last century there has been an orthodoxy in the social sciences characterized by sui generis structures of various kinds but also (paradoxically) by the unique role of individuals in their ability to intervene in the flow of events. This paper argues that there is a commonality to a number of challenges to orthodoxy that dates back to the beginnings of the social sciences themselves with Vico. Although many connections have been made between elements of these critiques (Latour's connection to Whitehead, Deleuze's connection to Tarde), this paper proposes to make such connections more explicit by focusing on a central commitment to or tendency towards a monism characterized by a univocal ontology. The implication is that these various alternatives perhaps have more in common than normally thought and can continue to learn from each other. Most importantly, they present a coherent and viable alternative to social science orthodoxy.
In: IMISCOE research
In: Exchange bibliography 1280/1282
In: Voprosy Ekonomiki, Heft 8, S. 102-116
Wide spreading of rational choice paradigm in economics puts forward the analysis of possibilities of its use in other social sciences. As a whole, it is applicable in every sphere where the choice takes place. However economic variables can be measured by value and therefore this discipline can use formal mathematical models. In other social sciences the use of formal models is more difficult. Hence the progress in social sciences may be achieved by constructing new mathematical models.
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 63, Heft 3, S. 663-664
ISSN: 1548-1433