Suchergebnisse
Filter
761 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
Factorisable Multitask Quantile Regression
SSRN
Working paper
Nuclear norms and German nuclear interests
In: Comparative strategy, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 241-249
ISSN: 0149-5933
World Affairs Online
Nuclear Norms and German Nuclear Interests
In: Comparative strategy, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 241-249
ISSN: 1521-0448
SSRN
Disarmament and Other Nuclear Norms
In: The Washington quarterly, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 93-108
ISSN: 1530-9177
Disarmament and Other Nuclear Norms
In: The Washington quarterly, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 93-108
ISSN: 0163-660X, 0147-1465
Nuclear Weapons as Symbols: The Role of Norms in Nuclear Policy Making
In: IBEI Working Paper No. 2006/3
SSRN
Working paper
Norm Exemption in States' NPT Nuclear Disarmament Obligations
In: Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 80
ISSN: 2579-8251
The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) is highly appreciated for its ability to stop further nuclear proliferation in the world. Since its existence, this treaty has been said to be successful in preventing potential states from possessing weapons of mass destruction. At least, there are more than 40 states who have the capability to develop their own nuclear programmes, although such programmes are restrained from coming to fruition. However, this successful story has not taken place in the area of nuclear disarmament. None of its nuclear weapon-owning members seem to proceed with realising a full disarmament aim. This raises the question of why the NPT is unable to achieve success in the field of nuclear disarmament as it has in the field of nuclear non-proliferation. The NPT does not only contain the idea of nuclear non-proliferation, but also the idea of nuclear disarmament. In understanding this question, using a political psychology approach, this study finds that nuclear-weapon states face the so-called moral dilemma between the desire to achieve national interests and the desire to fulfil social demands required by the international norm. By taking advantage of the shortcomings in the NPT narrative as well as relevant world situations, these states attempt to be exempted from dismantling nuclear weapons under their possession.
Nonproliferation norms: why states choose nuclear restraint
In: Studies in security and international affairs
Preface -- Exploring nuclear restraint -- Understanding the international social environment -- Japanese nuclear decision-making -- Egyptian nuclear decision-making -- Nuclear decision-making in Libya, Sweden, and Germany -- Reflections on theory and policy
World Affairs Online
Powerful nuclear norms trump tinkering with treaties
Blog: The Strategist
Some 178 states are parties to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT); another eight have signed but not yet ratified. Adopted on 10 September 1996 and signed two weeks later, its birth was protracted and painful. ...
Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint
In: Swiss political science review: SPSR = Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft = Revue suisse de science politique, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 413-422
ISSN: 1424-7755
The status of Norms against nuclear testing
In: The nonproliferation review: program for nonproliferation studies, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 20-32
ISSN: 1746-1766
The status of norms against nuclear testing
In: The nonproliferation review: program for nonproliferation studies, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 20-32
ISSN: 1073-6700
World Affairs Online
Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint
In: International studies review, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 790-791
ISSN: 1521-9488