Brexit, Boris Johnson and the Nobile Officium
In: 12 Journal of Civil Law Studies 295 (2019)
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: 12 Journal of Civil Law Studies 295 (2019)
SSRN
In: Tulane European and Civil Law Forum, Band 29
SSRN
In: Stephen Thomson, 'The Nobile Officium: The Extraordinary Equitable Jurisdiction of the Supreme Courts of Scotland' (Avizandum / Edinburgh University Press, 2015); ISBN: 9781904968337
SSRN
As mentioned in 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia article 1(3), Indonesia is a country of law. Reformation era has changed law system in Indonesia and given a big opportunity for law enforcement, espe- cially for advocate profession other than judicial power. As we know, advo- cate profession has been regulated in Laws No. 18 Year 2003 about advocate. According to that provision, advocate is in position as law enforcement, free and Independent which is guaranteed by laws and regulations, so that the exist- ence has the logical consequence that the advocate is aofficium nobille and have the same or equal position with other law enforcement authorities whom au- thorities also been determined by the laws and regulations in Indonesia, such as judges, prosecutors, and police. Sometimes ago , there were problems in regu- lating professional advocate which had caused heated debate among legal ex- perts, legislators and legal practitioners. It is because a submission of a draft of Law to amend the provisions of Law No. 18 year 2003 about the advocate.Kata Kunci : Advokat, Profesi Terhormat (Officium Nobile), Sistem Negara Hukum Indonesia.
BASE
In: Europe(s)
In: Europe(s) Ser.
Couverture -- Titre -- Copyright -- Table of contents -- Sommaire -- Disclaimer -- Avertissement -- Biographies of the Authors -- Présentation des auteurs -- Introduction: the future of lawyers -- Introduction : l'avenir des avocats -- Chapter 1. The future of justice -- Chapitre 1. L'avenir de la justice -- Introduction -- Introduction -- I. - Sachons tirer parti de nos faiblesses pour innover encore plus ! -- A. - Le constat : une justice peu financée -- B. - Les solutions : un plan pluriannuel ainsi qu'un recours massif aux ADR/ODR et aux technologies -- 1. - Les MARD et l'arbitrage -- 2. - Les ODR et la saisine en ligne des juridictions -- 3. - Les trames automatisées -- 4. - Les outils dits « prédictifs » -- II. - The Future of Justice: the judiciary's perspective -- A. - Introduction -- B. - Towards a digital justice: challenges and opportunities -- C. - Changes in the way we all work -- D. - Still sticking to the same values -- E. - Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Chapter 2. The future of legal services -- Chapitre 2. L'avenir des services juridiques -- Introduction -- Introduction -- I. - L'intelligence artificielle : l'outil dont les avocats ont besoin -- II. - L'avocat au cœur de l'avenir des services juridiques -- III. - The Future of Legal Services in the United States -- IV. - Pour une legaltech française : les opportunités sur le marché du droit -- A. - Les pionniers américains de la legaltech -- B. - La legaltech en France : vers une nouvelle exception française ? -- Conclusion -- Conclusion -- Chapter 3. The future of law firms -- Chapitre 3. L'avenir des cabinets d'avocats -- Introduction -- Introduction -- I. - Nobile officium negotium est -- A. - The nobile officium in search for profit -- B. - The dream machine -- C. - Legal education - with a bit of business on the side.
In: (1998) 3 Scottish Law & Practice Quarterly 134-158
SSRN
Working paper
Legal aid for the poor people is a right, but in practice it is hard to do. There is a contradiction between law No. 16 of 2011 which gives obligation of the granting of legal aid is located at LAO which have been accredited, and the provisions of Article 22 (1) of law No. 18 of 2003 which gives obligation to the advocate as an individual. In the realm of practice, the granting of legal aid is not running properly because many advocate/LAO who still wear rate/fee, shifting ideology advocates from officium nobile to the commercialization, and the convoluted Government disbursements. Bantuan hukum bagi rakyat miskin merupakan hak yang dijamin oleh konstitusi, tetapi praktiknya terasa sulit. Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris digunakan untuk mengungkap persoalan tersebut. Terdapat kontradiksi antara UU No. 16 Tahun 2011 dengan UU No. 18 Tahun 2003. Berdasar UU No. 16 Tahun 2011, kewajiban pemberian bantuan hukum terletak pada OBH yang telah terakreditasi, bukan pada advokat sebagai individu sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 22 ayat (1) UU No. 18 Tahun 2003. Pada ranah praktik, pemberian bantuan hukum ini tak berjalan semestinya karena banyak advokat/OBH yang mengenakan tarif/bayaran kepada orang yang dibelanya, pergeseran ideologi advokat dari officium nobile ke komersialisasi perkara, dan pencairan dana pemerintah yang berbelit-belit.
BASE
Legal aid is a concept in response to the community's need for the adage "law is sharp down, blunt up". The existence of Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid cannot be separated from the legal reform agenda that gives citizens the right to obtain justice and the right to a fair and impartial trial, including through the provision of legal aid. Legal aid is part of the advocate profession which is a noble profession or officium nobile because it requires the defense of all people regardless of background, race, skin color, religion, culture, socioeconomic, rich-poor, belief, politics, gender, and ideology.
BASE
Bantuan hukum adalah bagian dari profesi advokat yang merupakan profesi yang mulia atau officium nobile Karena mewajibkan pembelaan kepada semua orang tanpa membedakan latar belakang, ras, warna kulit, agama, budaya, sosial-ekonomi, kaya-miskin, keyakinan, politik, gender, dan ideologi. mungkin dalam masyarakat awam sulit untuk membedakan bantuan hukum dan profesi advokat, namun keharusan membela orang yang kurang mampu dalam profesi advokat sejalan dengan prinsip justice for all membuat profesi hukum yang satu ini populer di masyarakat internasional, tetapi tidak demikian halnya di Indonesia. Keruntuhan wibawa hukum akhir-akhir ini turut mempengaruhi citra advokat yang dituduh sebagai "calo perkara" yang komersial. Korupsi merajalela dimana-mana. Akibatnya hukum tidak lagi berkuasa dan tidak mempunyai otoritas lagi dan tidak ditaati masyarakat, Supremasi Hukum (supremacy of law) hanya menjadi slogan belaka. Kata Kunci: Bantuan Hukum
BASE
Setiap orang yang terkena suatu perkara mempunyai hak untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum. Hak Imunitas Advokat menjadi tolak ukur bagi seorang Advokat dalam melaksanakan tugasnya sesuai kuasa yang diberikan klien dalam pembelaan hukum dalam kasus yang ditangani. Ada Advokat yang diperiksa dan ditangkap pihak Kepolisian ketika membela kepentingan kliennya. Advokat yang berkedudukan sebagai profesi yang terhormat (officium nobile) dan sebagai aparat penegak hukum memerlukan hak imunitas untuk menjaga kemandirian dalam menjalankan profesinya. Pasal 16 Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat menyatakan bahwa Advokat tidak dapat dituntut baik secara perdata maupun pidana dalam menjalankan tugas profesinya dengan itikad baik untuk pembelaan klien dalam sidang Pengadilan, pengertian itu diperluas oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi Advokat tidak dapat dituntut baik secara perdata maupun pidana dalam menjalankan tugas profesinya dengan itikad baik untuk kepentingan pembelaan klien di dalam maupun di luar sidang pengadilan asalkan Advokat dalam menjalankan tugas profesinya tetap berpegangan pada kode etik dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Everyone involved in a case has the right of legal assistance. The Advocates' Immunity is a benchmark for an Advocate in carrying out his/her duties in accordance with the authority given by the client in a legal defense in the case handled. There are Advocates who are questioned and arrested by the Police when defending the interests of their clients. Advocate, as a honorable profession (officium nobile) and as law enforcement officers require the right of immunity to maintain independence in carrying out their duties. Article 16 of the Consitution Number 18 Year 2003 concerning Advocates states that Advocates cannot be prosecuted either in civil or criminal manner in carrying out their professional duties in good faith to defend clients in court trial, that understanding expanded by the Constitutional Court to Advocates cannot be prosecuted either in civil or criminal manner in carrying out his/her professional duties in good faith for the interest of the defense of clients inside and outside the court as long as the Advocate in carrying out his/her professional duties still adheres to the code of ethics and legislation.Keywords: Government Efforts, Right to Immunity, Advocates
BASE
Legal aid is an effort to fulfill the human rights, especially of the poorest groups of the society. The Constitution guarantees the right of every citizen to equal treatment before the law, including the right to access justice through legal aid. Based on the principle of equality before the law and the purpose of access to law and justice, the Government of Indonesia issued a regulation to realize these principles and objectives through Law No. 16 of 2011 on Legal Aid. The substance of the regulation requires law enforcers especially advocates as legal aid providers to provide legal assistance free of charge to the poor in Indonesia, moreover these obligations are normative obligations for advocates as officium nobile (noble profession) and the mandate of the Law No.18 of 2003 concerning Advocates. It is expected that efforts to provide free legal assistance can do optimal and effective in serving the underprivileged.Keywords: legal aid, human rights, justice
BASE
In: International journal of multicultural and multireligious understanding: IJMMU, Band 7, Heft 8, S. 477
ISSN: 2364-5369
Juridically, there is no clear and firm regulation related to the understanding and qualifications of malpractice advocates in Indonesia (there is a legal vacuum), but theoretically there have been many concepts and doctrines relating to legal malpractice, especially advocacy malpractice. In a sociological perspective, there have been many cases of advocacy malpractice that have emerged in the implementation of advocate practices in Indonesia. Meanwhile, in the perspective of legal philosophy, advocates as a noble legal profession (officium nobile) have no fair and certain formula for handling and settlement, both for clients who receive bad service from advocates and for advocates themselves as law enforcement officers. Based on the juridical, sociological, theoretical and philosophical reasons above, it is considered important to discuss the qualifications of an act including the malpractice of the Advocate profession and the forms of accountability of the advocate profession for advocacy malpractice cases. Therefore, this research uses normative legal research. Based on the results of the discussion, this study has the conclusion that the qualifications or parameters of the malpractice act of an advocate, if it meets the following requirements: (1) The existence of legal services provided by an advocate (rights and obligations); (2) Legal services are provided in: (a) below the applicable professional standards; (b) awarded in violation of the "fiduciary" obligation of the advocate; (c) defaults on contracts for providing legal services, or; (d) provided in a manner contrary to applicable law and code of conduct; (3) The advocate's actions take the form of acts against the law (intentional or negligence); (4) There are losses to the client; and (5) The loss is caused by the act of providing legal services by the advocate. There are three forms of advocacy accountability, namely ethical responsibility, juridical responsibility and disciplinary responsibility.
BEMERKENSWERTHE RECHTSFÄLLE, ENTSCHEIDUNGEN UND ANDERE MITTHEILUNGEN AUS DER KURHESSISCHEN RECHTSPFLEGE Bemerkenswerthe Rechtsfälle, Entscheidungen und andere Mittheilungen aus der kurhessischen Rechtspflege (-) Bemerkenswerthe Rechtsfälle, Entscheidungen und andere Mittheilungen aus der kurhessischen Rechtspflege (1_2) ( - ) Bezeichnung ( - ) Bezeichnung ( - ) 87. Verwaltungsverfügung. Inhibition dagegen. Lehnsverhältniß. Lehnhof. Dessen Befugnisse. Lehnsjurisdiction. . ( - ) 88. Disciplinargewalt bei Nebenstellen. Dienstvergehen. (239) 89. Besteuerungsrecht. Gesetz. Kabinetsjustiz. Administrativjustiz. Kriegsschaden. Summa appellabilis. (241) 90. Grundsteuer. Contribution. Rittersteuer. Eremtensteuer. Steuerfreiheit. Eviction. (245) 91. Classensteuer. Strafe unterlassener Einkommensangabe. (251) 92. Verkündigung der Straferkenntnisse wider abwesende ausgetretene Militärpflichtige. (256) 93. Rechsmittel der Staatsbehörden in Untersuchungssachen. (259) 94. Rechtsmittel der Forstbehörden in Strafsachen. Holzverkauf ins Ausland. (260) 95. Summa appellabilis in Strafsachen. (262) 96. Militär-Wittwen-Anstalt. (262) 97. Civil-Wittwen- und Waisengesellschaft nach der Verordnung vom 29. März 1827. (266) 98. Staatsdiener-Wittwen-Pension. Rückwirkung der Gesetze. (269) 99. Staatsdiener-Wittwenpension. Pfarrwittwe. Ehehindernisse. (277) 100. Schulhausbau. Oeconomiegebäude bei den Schulhäusern. Nöthigung der Gemeinden zu beidem Seitens der Staatsbehörden. . (281) 101. Kirchen-, Pfarr- und Schulhausbaukosten. Beitragspflicht. Reallast - Zahlung deshalbiger Rückstände. Staatsanwalt. Klage gegen denselben, . (284) 102. Zinsen. Vertragsmäßige. Verzugszinsen. Klage auf Accessorien. (293) 103. Zinsen ultra alterum tantum. (296) 104. Besitzstörung. Besitzentsetzung. Erbleihebeständer. Dessen Besitzrechte. Officium nobile judicis. Klagbenennung. (299) 105. Besitzstörung. Appellation. Appellationssumme. Appellation gegen eidauflegende Erkenntnisse. (302) 106. Eheanzeige. Einzugsgeld. (307) 107. Ehe. Mäkelgeld. (308) 108. Alimentation und Satisfaction bei der außerehelichen Schwängerung im Fuldischen. (309) 109. Minor. Darlehn. Actio de in rem verso. (311) 110. Immobilien. Verträge darüber. Neukauf. Rescission. Fructus percepti, percipiendi. Tutor testamentarius. Adhäsion. (313) 111. Immbilien. Verträge darüber. Actio Publiciana. Usucapion. (319) 112. Immobilien. Verträge darüber. Tradition. Actio venditi. Eviction. (323) 113. Immobilien. Verträge darüber. Tradition. Actio emti. Eviction. Irrthum. (328) 114. Rei vindicatio. Erwerbsgrund. Verjährung. Milde-Stiftung. pertinenz. Widerklage. Res litigiosa. Leihehrrlicher Besitz. . (334) 115. Pfandrecht. Eintragung in die neuen Hypothekenbücher. Restitution. Nichtigkeitsbeschwerde. (347) 116. Pfandrecht. Generalpfandrecht. Specialpfandrecht. Hypothekarische Klage. Verweisung ins Specialpfand. . (349) 117. Actio hypothecaria. Verweisung an den Hauptschuldner. Einrede des bessern Pfandrechts. Pfandrecht an eigener Sache. (352) 118. Waldhutegerechtigkeit. Offene, ständige Hute. Verjährung. Unvordentliche Verjährung. Forstwirthschaft. (354) 119. Jagdrecht. Actio confessoria und negatoria. Lehnspecification. Regent und Hof. Rotenburger Quart. (360) 120. Erbfähigkeit. Incest. Ehebruch. Persona turpis. (371) 121. Testament. Erbvertrag. Veräußerungen zum Nachtheil des vertragsmäßigen Erben. (376) 122. Successionsrecht der Ehegatten zu Hersfeld. Gewohnheitsrecht. Gerichtskunde. (381) 123. Eventualbelehnung. Anwartschaft. Successionsvorbehalt. Verpfändungsconsens. Urkundenbeweis. Beglaubigte Abschrift. Edition. (383) 124. Sammtbelehnung. Gemeinschaftlicher Lehnbrief. Lehnträger. (395) 125. Erbleihe. Verpfändungsconsens. Restitution. (398) 126. Erbleihe. Vindication Seitens des Leiheherrn. Veräußerung. Gaducität. (401) 127. Landsiedelgüter. Erbfolge in denselben. Veräußerung derselben. Observanz. (406) 128. Grundzins. Lieferungsort. Versatz. (412) 129. Ablösung. Deren Einfluß auf die bisherigen Rechtsverhältnisse. Provocatio ex lege diffamari. (416) 130. Zehntablösung nach dem Pachtvertrage. Repartition des Ablösungscapitals auf mehrere Zehntpflichtige. Staatsanwalt. Rentmeister. (420) 131. Bannrecht. Dessen Entstehung durch Verjährung. Subjective Cumulation. Streitgenossenschaft. . (437) 132. Reihebrauer. Deren Entschädigung bei verpachtetem Braurechte. (444) 133. Brandversicherung. Betrug. Irrthum. Staatsanwalt. (453) Bezeichnung ( - )
BASE