Suchergebnisse

Advertising matter interspersed. ; On recto of frontispiece: Map of grounds. ; Frontispiece: Birds̓ eye view of Lewis and Clark Centennial Exposition and View of the United States government buildings from the Trail. ; Illustrated cover. ; Mode of access: Internet.

At head of title: Lewis and Clark Centennial Exposition. ; "Auspices Lewis and Clark Congresses Committee and a Committee of Pacific Northwest Educators. ; Preface -- Program -- Convocation address / by W.T. Harris -- Unsettled questions in the organization and administration of the schools / by A.S. Draper -- The relation of the Pacific Coast to education in the Orient / by B.I. Wheeler -- Education in a democracy / by F.L. Soldan -- School extension and adult education / by H.M. Leipziger -- Manual training, abstract of the address by H.M. Leipziger -- The problem of the rural school / by J.H. Ackerman -- Higher agricultural education / by E.A. Bryan -- Education in reference to our future industrial and commercial development / by H.J. Rogers -- Education and state / by P.L. Campbell. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; BANC; F883.E3.L3: Printing master available (85-2787) shelved with Main's negatives ; BANC; F883.E3.L3: Bancroft has positive microfilm

One manner in which Indian tribes exercise their inherent sovereignty is by asserting sovereign immunity. In Lewis v. Clarke, the Court decided that the sovereign immunity extended to instrumentalities of tribes did not further extend to tribal employees acting within the scope of their employment. The Court acknowledged the concerns of the lower court, namely, the possibility of setting a precedent allowing future plaintiffs to sidestep a tribe's sovereign immunity by suing a tribal employee in his individual capacity. However, the Supreme Court ultimately felt that the immunity of tribal employees should not exceed the immunity extended to state and federal employees sued in their individual capacity.

Letter from Mr. Lewis Clarke, President of The American Exchange Nation Bank to Gen. Salvador Alvarado expressing his content with the victory of Gen. Alvaro Obregón in the elections. Editorial commentary from Mr. Lewis Clarke. Letter from Gen. Alvaro Obregón to Mr. Lewis Clarke thanking him for the letter and reply. BRISBANE, Arthur. "Today. Why Idealism Fails. A Wall Street Clerk. Quaint Japanese Gods. Workmen's Agreements". NEW YORK AMERICAN. New York, New York. Sept. 4 1920. Files C-49 and VD-32 / Carta del Sr. Lewis Clarke, Presidente de The American Exchange National Bank al Gral. Salvador Alvarado, expresando su satisfacción por el triunfo en las elecciones del Gral. Alvaro Obregón. Comentario editorial del Sr. Lewis Clarke. Carta del Gral. Alvaro Obregón al Sr. Lewis Clarke agradeciendo la carta al Gral. Alvarado y respuesta. BRISBANE, Arthur. "Today. Why Idealism Fails. A Wall Street Clerk. Quaint Japanese Gods. Workmen's Agreements". NEW YORK AMERICAN. Nueva York, N.Y. Sept. 4, 1920. Exps. C-49 y VD-32

The nation to nation relationship between tribes and the federal government is unique. Within that relationship, the federal government acknowledges and respects tribal sovereignty. An important aspect of sovereignty is sovereign immunity. Lewis v. Clarke confronts the applicability of sovereign immunity through an extension of tribal sovereignty over an employee defendant. After having heard oral argument, the United States Supreme Court could either reaffirm or severely limit the applicability of tribal sovereign immunity to "arms" of a tribe. While the lower court analyzed tribal sovereign immunity by considering the damages sought, the Supreme Court opinion portends to extend far beyond just this negligence claim.

"Der Aufsatz untersucht die Teilnahme Rußlands an der Centenar-Ausstellung 1876 in Philadelphia. Er zeigt, daß Standpunkte, die sich mit den sozialen, kulturellen und politischen Werten, welche der Westen verkörperte, auseinandersetzten, ebenfalls auf dem Ausstellungsgelände vertreten waren und daß Rußlands Selbstdarstellung auf der Exposition anläßlich des hundertjährigen Bestehens der USA eine Vielfalt von überlappenden Bildern und Interpretationen hervorrief. Rußlands Teilnahme bietet eine Gelegenheit, die Komplexität und Widersprüchlichkeit der Beziehungen zwischen den verschiedenen internationalen Parteien hinsichtlich der Ziele und Bedeutungen jenes Ringens um Hegemonie auf den Weltausstellungen zu untersuchen. Der russische Fall belegt, daß Weltausstellungen nicht völlig kohärente Projekte des Strebens nach Hegemonie waren. Vielmehr lassen sich zahlreiche Brüche zwischen den teilnehmenden Ländern hinter der Fassade einer einheitlichen und universalisierten Repräsentation von Modernität und Zivilisation ausmachen." (Autorenreferat)