Combat Motivation in Today's Soldiers
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 659-663
ISSN: 0095-327X
90 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 659-663
ISSN: 0095-327X
In: Armed forces & society, Band 29, Heft 2, S. 306-309
ISSN: 1556-0848
In: Orbis: FPRI's journal of world affairs, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 278-288
ISSN: 0030-4387
In: Orbis: FPRI's journal of world affairs, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 278-288
ISSN: 0030-4387
World Affairs Online
In: Armed forces & society, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 599-622
ISSN: 1556-0848
This article analyzes the ethic of the US military to rescue its fallen warriors. The US military will go to extraordinary lengths to evacuate its wounded, and more interestingly, to recover its dead. While taking risks to recover the body of a fallen soldier may make no rational sense, it impacts significantly on the unit, the military profession, and US society. This article examines the "leave no man behind" phenomenon through individual, family, unit, institutional, and societal perspectives. Possible reasons why the ethic has increased in salience and potential future implications are also discussed.
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 600-622
ISSN: 0095-327X
In: Armed forces & society, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 659-663
ISSN: 1556-0848
The MacCoun, Kier, and Belkin critique of Why They Fight: Combat Motivation in the Iraq War is based on the incorrect assumption that the outcome variable of the study is combat performance. Why They Fight seeks to investigate combat motivation—not battlefield performance. Why They Fight examines why soldiers continue in battle despite obvious risk to personal safety. Referencing a well-established body of literature and using a methodology appropriate for analyzing combat motivation, Why They Fight concludes that today's soldiers, just as those in the past, fight for each other. Why They Fight also reports, however, that today's soldiers are motivated in combat by notions of freedom and democracy
The author examines the Operation IRAQI FREEDOM environment and concludes that the complexity, unpredictability, and ambiguity of postwar Iraq is producing a cohort of innovative, confident, and adaptable junior officers. They are learning to make decisions in chaotic conditions and to be mentally agile in executing counterinsurgency and nation-building operations simultaneously. As a result, the Army will soon have a cohort of company grade officers who are accustomed to operating independently, taking the initiative, and adapting to changes. The author warns that the Army must now acknowledge and encourage this newly developed adaptability in our junior officers or risk stifling the innovation critically needed in the Army's future leaders.
BASE
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 930-931
ISSN: 0095-327X
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 296-298
ISSN: 0095-327X
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 296-297
ISSN: 0095-327X
In: Armed forces & society, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 296-298
ISSN: 1556-0848
In: Armed forces & society, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 930-931
ISSN: 1556-0848
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 36, Heft 5, S. 930-932
ISSN: 0095-327X