Suchergebnisse

The Jordanian criminal procedures did not include provisions which is related to causation of detention decision, and the cases that justify the decision of detention, extension, and notify the defendant reasons for his detention with contrary of other criminal legislations، such as French and، Lebanese legislation، this causes main problems in practically field, this study will discuss what is the extent of the commitment of the prosecutor or judge in causation of detention decision in the Jordanian criminal legislation. The researcher studies this subject, analyzes، and defines the attitude of the legislator in France, Egypt, Lebanon, and Jordan from the causation of detention decision, and to indicate to the provisions of judiciary in France, Egypt, and Jordan, the researcher finds out that The Jordanian criminal of the procedures fall short in handling the idea of causation of detention decision, or extension, and the cases that justify the decision of detention, extension, and notifying the defendant reasons for his detention, so he suggests that the article(114), and article(116) of The Jordanian criminal procedures should be amend in order to bridge this gap to eliminate any difficulties and the defendant reasons for his detention that may arise by this subject.

Currently, international community faces bloody armed conflicts. During the operation in Syria, thousands of civilians become victims. Many other countries are suffering because they are forced to divide their homes with the waves of migrants. Every day we see violation of human rights, which are the most important values enshrined in the international law, and these violations constitute crimes against the international law. Ukraine is also experiencing a similar situation. During the aggravation of Ukrainian-Russian relations, the issue of responsibility of the parties to the conflict for their crimes is very relevant. In this context, accusations and convictions often occur at the level of national courts. They are the most effective instrument of condemning citizens of the other party for war crimes. Our task is to figure out whether there exists an effective mechanism to convict the perpetrators of the most serious crimes. There are mechanisms to punish the subject whose actions affect the interests of all mankind. It is widely known and used both in the international and national law, and called universal jurisdiction. The problem is that still, there are not any unified principles for its application. In particular, the question arises, who can apply it and against whom. The article reveals the peculiarities of application of the universal jurisdiction in the national law. In particular, attention is paid to the mechanisms for consolidating universal jurisdiction in the legislation of the Romano-Germanic and Anglo-Saxon legal systems, in particular as regards its subject-matter, personal and territorial application. An inalienable element of this study is the analysis of the powers and practice of the judicial authorities in this matter. The main purpose of the article is a study of universal jurisdiction, based on classical cases of its consolidation in the national law. Additionally, we consider issues of practical application thereof in cases of war crimes. The conclusion is that the national legislation has moved to a more narrow understanding of the universal jurisdiction. Most often, in order to start a case, the complainant must be present before the national court. It is important that the offenses have a connection with public interests of the state iudex loci deprehensionis. The problem is also that the consolidation and application of universal jurisdiction at the national level has not been yet unified.Article received 25.02.2019 ; Щодня ми бачимо порушення прав людини, які є найважливішою цінністю, закріпленою в міжнародному праві, і ці порушення є злочинами проти міжнародного права. Україна також переживає подібну ситуацію. Під час загострення українсько-російських відносин питання відповідальності сторін конфлікту за злочини є дуже актуальним. Засудження часто відбувається на рівні національних судів, адже вони є найефективнішим інструментом засудження громадян іншої сторони за воєнні злочини. У статті розкрито особливості застосування універсальної юрисдикції в національному праві. Ця концепція є актуальною для України сьогодні у світлі подій на Сході. У статті розглянуто механізми закріплення універсальної юрисдикції в законодавстві держав романо-германської та англосаксонської правових систем, зокрема щодо її предметного, персонального та територіального застосування. Здійснено аналіз повноважень та практики судових органів у цьому питанні.Матеріал надійшов 25.02.2019

Currently, international community faces bloody armed conflicts. During the operation in Syria, thousands of civilians become victims. Many other countries are suffering because they are forced to divide their homes with the waves of migrants. Every day we see violation of human rights, which are the most important values enshrined in the international law, and these violations constitute crimes against the international law. Ukraine is also experiencing a similar situation. During the aggravation of Ukrainian-Russian relations, the issue of responsibility of the parties to the conflict for their crimes is very relevant. In this context, accusations and convictions often occur at the level of national courts. They are the most effective instrument of condemning citizens of the other party for war crimes. Our task is to figure out whether there exists an effective mechanism to convict the perpetrators of the most serious crimes. There are mechanisms to punish the subject whose actions affect the interests of all mankind. It is widely known and used both in the international and national law, and called universal jurisdiction. The problem is that still, there are not any unified principles for its application. In particular, the question arises, who can apply it and against whom. The article reveals the peculiarities of application of the universal jurisdiction in the national law. In particular, attention is paid to the mechanisms for consolidating universal jurisdiction in the legislation of the Romano-Germanic and Anglo-Saxon legal systems, in particular as regards its subject-matter, personal and territorial application. An inalienable element of this study is the analysis of the powers and practice of the judicial authorities in this matter. The main purpose of the article is a study of universal jurisdiction, based on classical cases of its consolidation in the national law. Additionally, we consider issues of practical application thereof in cases of war crimes. The conclusion is that the national legislation has moved to a more narrow understanding of the universal jurisdiction. Most often, in order to start a case, the complainant must be present before the national court. It is important that the offenses have a connection with public interests of the state iudex loci deprehensionis. The problem is also that the consolidation and application of universal jurisdiction at the national level has not been yet unified.Article received 25.02.2019 ; Щодня ми бачимо порушення прав людини, які є найважливішою цінністю, закріпленою в міжнародному праві, і ці порушення є злочинами проти міжнародного права. Україна також переживає подібну ситуацію. Під час загострення українсько-російських відносин питання відповідальності сторін конфлікту за злочини є дуже актуальним. Засудження часто відбувається на рівні національних судів, адже вони є найефективнішим інструментом засудження громадян іншої сторони за воєнні злочини. У статті розкрито особливості застосування універсальної юрисдикції в національному праві. Ця концепція є актуальною для України сьогодні у світлі подій на Сході. У статті розглянуто механізми закріплення універсальної юрисдикції в законодавстві держав романо-германської та англосаксонської правових систем, зокрема щодо її предметного, персонального та територіального застосування. Здійснено аналіз повноважень та практики судових органів у цьому питанні.Матеріал надійшов 25.02.2019

Currently, international community faces bloody armed conflicts. During the operation in Syria, thousands of civilians become victims. Many other countries are suffering because they are forced to divide their homes with the waves of migrants. Every day we see violation of human rights, which are the most important values enshrined in the international law, and these violations constitute crimes against the international law. Ukraine is also experiencing a similar situation. During the aggravation of Ukrainian-Russian relations, the issue of responsibility of the parties to the conflict for their crimes is very relevant. In this context, accusations and convictions often occur at the level of national courts. They are the most effective instrument of condemning citizens of the other party for war crimes. Our task is to figure out whether there exists an effective mechanism to convict the perpetrators of the most serious crimes. There are mechanisms to punish the subject whose actions affect the interests of all mankind. It is widely known and used both in the international and national law, and called universal jurisdiction. The problem is that still, there are not any unified principles for its application. In particular, the question arises, who can apply it and against whom. The article reveals the peculiarities of application of the universal jurisdiction in the national law. In particular, attention is paid to the mechanisms for consolidating universal jurisdiction in the legislation of the Romano-Germanic and Anglo-Saxon legal systems, in particular as regards its subject-matter, personal and territorial application. An inalienable element of this study is the analysis of the powers and practice of the judicial authorities in this matter. The main purpose of the article is a study of universal jurisdiction, based on classical cases of its consolidation in the national law. Additionally, we consider issues of practical application thereof in cases of war crimes. The conclusion is that the national legislation has moved to a more narrow understanding of the universal jurisdiction. Most often, in order to start a case, the complainant must be present before the national court. It is important that the offenses have a connection with public interests of the state iudex loci deprehensionis. The problem is also that the consolidation and application of universal jurisdiction at the national level has not been yet unified.Article received 25.02.2019 ; Щодня ми бачимо порушення прав людини, які є найважливішою цінністю, закріпленою в міжнародному праві, і ці порушення є злочинами проти міжнародного права. Україна також переживає подібну ситуацію. Під час загострення українсько-російських відносин питання відповідальності сторін конфлікту за злочини є дуже актуальним. Засудження часто відбувається на рівні національних судів, адже вони є найефективнішим інструментом засудження громадян іншої сторони за воєнні злочини. У статті розкрито особливості застосування універсальної юрисдикції в національному праві. Ця концепція є актуальною для України сьогодні у світлі подій на Сході. У статті розглянуто механізми закріплення універсальної юрисдикції в законодавстві держав романо-германської та англосаксонської правових систем, зокрема щодо її предметного, персонального та територіального застосування. Здійснено аналіз повноважень та практики судових органів у цьому питанні.Матеріал надійшов 25.02.2019

Individual title pages of some numbers of 1917-1919 read: Journal of comparative legislation and international law; of 1920: Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation and International Law, the cover title remains stable. ; Imprint varies. ; Edited for the Society of Comparative Legislation. ; Includes an annual "Review of legislation." ; Mode of access: Internet. ; New ser. v. 16 (1916)-v. 18 (1918). 1 v. (Includes index to earlier title); ser. 3, v. 1 (1919)-v. 20 (1938). 1 v.; ser. 3, v. 21 (1939)-v. 25 (1943). 1 v. ; Merged with: International law quarterly (London, England), to form: International and comparative law quarterly.

At head of title: Wisconsin Free Library Commission. Legislative Reference Department. ; Bulletin no. 21 is no. 11 revised; number changed by stamp. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Includes an annual "Review of legislation". ; Includes an annual "Review of legislation". ; Mode of access: Internet. ; New ser., v. 1 (1890)-new ser., v. 15 (1915). 1 v.; new ser., v. 16 (1916)-new ser., v. 18 (1918). (Includes index to first vol. of later title.) 1 v.

Includes annual "review of legislation" covering the years 1895-1917. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Each no. has also a distinctive title. ; Mode of access: Internet.