Internetdelikte Und Die Herausforderungen Des Forum Shoppings (Internet Torts and the Challenges Posed by Forum Shopping)
In: University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 2017-008
198 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 2017-008
SSRN
Working paper
In: Hornbook series
Overview of the global Internet -- Perspectives on global Internet law -- Global internet jurisdiction -- Internet-related contract law -- Consumer regulation in cyberspace -- Global Internet torts -- Internet-related privacy -- Cybercrimes -- Content regulation on the Internet -- Copyrighted works in cyberspace -- Trademarks on the global Internet -- Trade secrets in cyberspace -- Patent law and the Internet.
Internet Crimes, Torts and Scam : Investigations and Remedies helps attorneys understand the increasing range of illegal and malicious Internet activity and a similarly expanding number of response or enforcement options. Reflecting a "real-world" dynamic, the book is problem-oriented and cuts across many practice areas including intellectual property enforcement, libel, third-party liability, forensics, and global jurisdictional issues. It will aid practitioners who need to identify not only the type of problem a client faces but how to investigate and best respond to protect a client's interests in any given situation. (Quelle: Text Verlagseinband / Verlag)
SSRN
Working paper
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/uiug.30112105065798
Cover title. ; "1 July 1983." ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
With the increasing use of the Internet, all on-line users, web site owners, e-commerce companies and consumers alike, feel the need to be able to rely on clear standards for a potential contract or tort lawsuit following the Internet presence that could lead to multinational litigation. This goal could be achieved if the negotiations of the Hague Convention on international jurisdiction and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters succeed in harmonizing the rules of the different legal systems around the globe, or at least create a minimum standard for legal cases which would benefit greatly e-commerce and Internet litigation. The author argues that the global character of the Internet does not present an obstacle to regulation. He then proceeds in a more detailed description and examination of the different systems of jurisdictional law, the current solutions as well as the proposed approaches for jurisdiction with regard to Internet litigation in tort and contract cases in the United States and the European Union. Concluding that the current American doctrine lacks certainty as well as foresee ability while providing ground for developing modern approaches, the author then argues that the European solution provides a better set of rules-especially for consumer contracts-and only the European solution can be used as a foundation for an international solution and best suits today's demands in multinational e-commerce and Internet tort cases. However, a slightly modified American/Canadian "targeting" test provides helpful criteria as well as a strong base concept with regard to Internet-related litigation and should therefore be integrated into an international solution for multinational litigation for a solid international solution to be acheived. By implementing this American/Canadian approach, the subsequent rules will provide foreseeability as well as the necessary flexibility to include new technologies and developments will be ensured. Finally, the status of the negotiations of the Hague Convention and the possible obstacles and problems of the current solutions is presented, along with a proposed solution aiming to institute a clear set of rules to establish foreseeability and certainty, while simultaneously establishing a concept that provides the flexibility to incorporate future developments.
BASE
With the increasing use of the Internet, all on-line users, web site owners, e-commerce companies and consumers alike, feel the need to be able to rely on clear standards for a potential contract or tort lawsuit following the Internet presence that could lead to multinational litigation. This goal could be achieved if the negotiations of the Hague Convention on international jurisdiction and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters succeed in harmonizing the rules of the different legal systems around the globe, or at least create a minimum standard for legal cases which would benefit greatly e-commerce and Internet litigation. The author argues that the global character of the Internet does not present an obstacle to regulation. He then proceeds in a more detailed description and examination of the different systems of jurisdictional law, the current solutions as well as the proposed approaches for jurisdiction with regard to Internet litigation in tort and contract cases in the United States and the European Union. Concluding that the current American doctrine lacks certainty as well as foresee ability while providing ground for developing modern approaches, the author then argues that the European solution provides a better set of rules-especially for consumer contracts-and only the European solution can be used as a foundation for an international solution and best suits today's demands in multinational e-commerce and Internet tort cases. However, a slightly modified American/Canadian "targeting" test provides helpful criteria as well as a strong base concept with regard to Internet-related litigation and should therefore be integrated into an international solution for multinational litigation for a solid international solution to be acheived. By implementing this American/Canadian approach, the subsequent rules will provide foreseeability as well as the necessary flexibility to include new technologies and developments will be ensured. Finally, the status of the negotiations of the Hague Convention and the possible obstacles and problems of the current solutions is presented, along with a proposed solution aiming to institute a clear set of rules to establish foreseeability and certainty, while simultaneously establishing a concept that provides the flexibility to incorporate future developments.
BASE
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 401-418
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/umn.31951d02425421m
"A panel discussion presented to the Washington State Bar Association's annual convention, Tacoma, Wash., Sept. 1961." ; Cover title. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
In: 23 Yearbook of Private International Law 171–210 (2021–22)
SSRN
In: Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional Privado XVIII (2018) 163-192
SSRN
"July, 1988." ; Shipping list no.: 99-0096-P. ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE
List of Abbreviations --Acknowledgements --Introduction --The Need for Reform: The Current EU Legal Framework --Digging Deeper: The National Norms on Intermediary Accessory Liability --Back to the Basics: The Elements of a European Accessory Liability --Shaping European Intermediary Accessory Copyright Liability: What Would a Reasonable Intermediary Do? --Summary and Conclusion --Bibliography.
In: Cardozo Women's Law Journal, Band 27, Heft 2
SSRN
In: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/osu.32437122453695
Includes index. ; Blank page inserted between each page. ; "Table of reference to the works of standard authors" : p. 125-126. ; Mode of access: Internet.
BASE