Independent Creation in a World of AI
In: FIU Law Review (2020, Forthcoming)
2913 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: FIU Law Review (2020, Forthcoming)
SSRN
In: 12 UC Irvine Law Review 747 (2022).
SSRN
Working paper
In: 64 William & Mary Law Review 1617 (2023)
SSRN
In: Italian Institutional Reforms: A Public Choice Perspective, S. 179-195
In: International legal materials: current documents, Band 34, Heft 5, S. 1298
ISSN: 0020-7829
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 34, Heft 5, S. 1298-1310
ISSN: 1930-6571
In: Proceeding 6th Global Business and Finance Research Conference, 2016
SSRN
In this presentation, we explain how the development of each engines is changing the balance in copyright law regarding the issue copying
BASE
In: The journal of American-East Asian relations, Band 10, Heft 1-2, S. 1-28
ISSN: 1058-3947
In: The journal of American-East Asian relations, Band 10, Heft 1-2, S. 1-27
ISSN: 1876-5610
AbstractSince the end of the Vietnam War thirty years ago, Western scholars have made countless attempts at explaining that conflict's course and rationalizing its outcome. These attempts have considered a wide variety of elements ranging from the personalities of those involved in the decision- making process in Washington to the technologies used by American forces against their enemies in Indochina. Ironically, few scholars have considered the element that may have been most important in determining the outcome of the war, mainly the North Vietnamese leadership. As a result, little is known about the nature of that leadership. For many Western scholars, Ho Chi Minh inspired the North Vietnamese war effort, Vo Nguyen Giap coordinated it, and Pham Van Dong, as prime minister of the Democratic Republic of (North) Vietnam (DRVN), supervised the implementation of Ho and Giap's policies. That others may have been involved and influential in the decision-making process in Hanoi is rarely considered in Western scholarship. We accept the notion that the Ho-Giap-Dong axis led the effort against the United States, and the zeal of the North Vietnamese people carried Hanoi to victory.
In: Politické vedy: časopis pre politológiu, najnovšie dejiny, medzinárodné vztʹahy, bezpec̆nostné s̆túdiá = Political sciences : journal for political sciences, modern history, international relations, security studies, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 108-129
ISSN: 1338-5623
This article examines the diplomatic relations between Czechoslovakia and the Zionist movement during the late 1940s in regard to Czechoslovakia's contribution to the establishment of the State of Israel in May 1948. The support provided by Czechoslovakia, both diplomatically and militarily, played a pivotal role in the formation of an independent Jewish state. Notably, this assistance continued even after Czechoslovakia underwent a political regime change following the communist coup d'état in February 1948. The article aims to unravel the reasons behind this exceptional cooperation between two seemingly distant actors, both geographically and ideologically. Drawing upon recently disclosed archival collections from the relevant Czech archives and providing the insight to the foreign policy of a Soviet satellite, this research aligns with the historiographic paradigm known as the New Cold War History. By focusing on the contributions of satellite states to Cold War history, it sheds light on Czechoslovakia's significant role in shaping the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East in late 1940s. Even though it might have been a somewhat marginalized story in the later decades of the Cold War due to the affiliation of the two countries with opposite ideological blocs, the history of Czechoslovakia's contribution to the creation of the State of Israel is now recognized as one of the significant narratives in the mutual relations between the two states, demonstrating the importance of past-present linkages.
This entry has been realised in the framework of the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018 project "LoGov - Local Government and the Changing Urban-Rural Interplay". LoGov aims to provide solutions for local governments that address the fundamental challenges resulting from urbanisation. To address this complex issue, 18 partners from 17 countries and six continents share their expertise and knowledge in the realms of public law, political science, and public administration. LoGov identifies, evaluates, compares, and shares innovative practices that cope with the impact of changing urban-rural relations in five major local government areas: (1) local responsibilities and public services, (2) local financial arrangements, (3) structure of local government, (4) intergovernmental relations of local governments, and (5) people's participation in local decision-making. The present entry addresses intergovernmental relations of local governments in Germany. The entry forms part of the LoGov Report on Germany. To access the full version of the report on Germany, other practices regarding intergovernmental relations of local governments and to receive more information about the project, please visit: https://www.logov-rise.eu/. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823961.
BASE
In: German politics, Band 23, Heft 1-2, S. 43-58
ISSN: 1743-8993
In: German politics: Journal of the Association for the Study of German Politics, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 43-58
ISSN: 0964-4008
In: Eastern journal of European studies: EJES, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 86-104
ISSN: 2068-6633