Human Intelligence
In: Return: Magazin für Transformation und Turnaround, Band 9, Heft 5, S. 34-36
ISSN: 2520-8187
6688 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Return: Magazin für Transformation und Turnaround, Band 9, Heft 5, S. 34-36
ISSN: 2520-8187
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 89, Heft 12, S. 18-20
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: GRUR International, Band 71, Heft 10
SSRN
In: GRUR international: Journal of European and International IP Law, Band 72, Heft 1, S. 1-2
ISSN: 2632-8550
In: Marine corps gazette: the Marine Corps Association newsletter, Band 89, Heft 12, S. 18-20
ISSN: 0025-3170
In: Strategic survey, Band 104, Heft 1, S. 28-38
ISSN: 1476-4997
In: Man: the journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Band 6, Heft 1, S. 154
In: Defense intelligence journal: a publication of the Defense Intelligence College Foundation, Band 6, S. 33-61
ISSN: 1061-6845
In: Intelligence and national security, Band 26, Heft 6, S. 864-886
ISSN: 0268-4527
In: International journal of legal and social order, Band 3, Heft 1
ISSN: 2821-4161
This article delves into the critical role of geography in military operations and intelligence, examining the significance of geographical features in military strategies and engagements. The focus is directed towards human geography and its intricate connection with intelligence operations. Population demographics, cultural diversity, and societal dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping intelligence collection and analysis.
The final part of the paper takes a forward-looking perspective, exploring the evolving landscape of Human Intelligence (HUMINT) within the anthroposphere of the future. It delves into how intelligence agencies adapt to an ever-changing world, where geography remains a constant but is coupled with digital advancements, global connectivity, and emerging threats.
Since the beginning of the human race, decision making and rational thinking played a pivotal role for mankind to either exist and succeed or fail and become extinct. Self-awareness, cognitive thinking, creativity, and emotional magnitude allowed us to advance civilization and to take further steps toward achieving previously unreachable goals. From the invention of wheels to rockets and telegraph to satellite, all technological ventures went through many upgrades and updates. Recently, increasing computer CPU power and memory capacity contributed to smarter and faster computing appliances that, in turn, have accelerated the integration into and use of artificial intelligence (AI) in organizational processes and everyday life. Artificial intelligence can now be found in a wide range of organizational systems including healthcare and medical diagnosis, automated stock trading, robotic production, telecommunications, space explorations, and homeland security. Self-driving cars and drones are just the latest extensions of AI. This thrust of AI into organizations and daily life rests on the AI community's unstated assumption of its ability to completely replicate human learning and intelligence in AI. Unfortunately, even today the AI community is not close to completely coding and emulating human intelligence into machines. Despite the revolution of digital and technology in the applications level, there has been little to no research in addressing the question of decision making governance in human-intelligent and machine-intelligent (HI-MI) systems. There also exists no foundational, core reference, or domain ontologies for HI-MI decision governance systems. Further, in absence of an expert reference base or body of knowledge (BoK) integrated with an ontological framework, decision makers must rely on best practices or standards that differ from organization to organization and government to government, contributing to systems failure in complex mission critical situations. It is still debatable whether and when human or machine decision capacity should govern or when a joint human-intelligence and machine-intelligence (HI-MI) decision capacity is required in any given decision situation. To address this deficiency, this research establishes a formal, top level foundational ontology of HI-MI decision governance in parallel with a grounded theory based body of knowledge which forms the theoretical foundation of a systemic HI-MI decision governance framework.
BASE
In: Harper torchbooks 1740
In: Intelligence and national security, Band 26, Heft 6, S. 864-885
ISSN: 1743-9019
In: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology Ser.