Suchergebnisse

Abstrak Nama ditentukan melalui referensi yang sesuai konsep dan fungsinya. Penamaan tersebut merupakan penggabungkan pemikiran manusia yang mengacu pada makna. Kendaraan perang yang telah ada pada sebelum perang dunia kedua sampai saat ini mempunyai berbagai nama. Salah satu keunikannya adalah nama diambil dari kata nama hewan. Salah satu contoh nama jenis UH-60 Helikopter Pengangkat Menengah adalah Elang Hitam yang diambil dari jenis burung. Beberapa jenis hewan lain juga mengisi konsep pada nama-nama kendaraan perang. Pertimbanganya adalah alasan keunikan khusus pada pada nama-nama ini. Bingkai Semantik menilai alasan-alasan dengan mengkombinasikan perilaku hewan dan pengetahuan linguistik untuk mendiskripsikan makna dan tujuan. Proses ini dapat mengkategorikan aspek yang ditinjau mengenai pandangan inti. Ini dimaksudkan untuk mencari karakter dan keunikan hewan dengan kendaraan perang untuk menentukan kecanggihan alat pada kendaraan perang. Metode yang digunakan pada permasalahan ini adalah deskripsi kualitatif. Sumber data nama kendaraan perang dan perilaku hewan beserta gambar didapatkan dan dikelompokkan yang diambil dari situs terpercaya. Dengan setiap pemahaman proses diskusi, skripsi ini akan didapatkan pemahaman mengenai persamaan perilaku hewan dan kecanggihan alat kendaraan perang. Pada hasilnya, terdapat bingkai kategorisasi yang dapat meliputi artian alasan apa pada nama kendaraan perang. Ini dapat menangani perspektif manusia melalui pemilihan hewan yang sesuai. Kemudian, hubungan makna kenapa kendaraan perang menggunakan nama hewan terjelaskan. Kata Kunci: kognitif hewan, kognitif semantik, bingkai semantik Abstract A name can make a consideration upon the reference that has been taken to fill its concept and also function. It connects the human thought to catch the meaning. Military vehicle have already been named since world war II. One of the feature is obtained by the name of animal. One of the Helicopter names is named with the name UH-60 Black Hawk, which is adapted by the name of bird. Other types of animal's name come to fill a concept in military vehicle names. The consideration is based on what and why the reason of animal name is choosen in military vehicle and become its particular feature as this problem. Frame Semantics examines those reasons by combining animal cognition and linguistic knowledge to describe the meaning and goal. The process categorizes them with aspect which is reviewed in related point in perspective. It aims to seek what animal behavior and what function and feature in military vehicle to dispose what advaced features inside the military vehicle when it is reviewed in those animal reason. This method is suitable to get the descriptive qualitative. The source of the data both military vehicle name and animal cognition in information and picture was collected from realible sites. To understand every discussion process, this thesis is obtained from the understanding related relevance with the animal character through military vehicle. As the result, there are three frame categorisations that can cover the meaning to find reasons in military vehicle name. It can handle the human perspective trough the selected animal. Then the relation meaning why military vehicle uses animal name is explained. Keywords: animal cognition, cognitif semantic, frame semantic

El presente artículo aborda el estudio de la teoría de marcos semánticos aplicada al acceso patrimonio. Partiendo de la concepción propuesta por la lingüística cognitiva del marco semántico como una herramienta para la comprensión, presentamos un estudio que explora las posibilidades de este instrumento como catalizador de los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje al patrimonio. Atendiendo a las características del enfoque a/r/tográfico, el estudio se organiza como una práctica artístico-visual en la que investigación, educación y creación artística se presentan como acciones simultáneas que se retroalimentan, de tal modo que el proceso y las imágenes resultantes son en sí mismas objeto de análisis, instrumento de investigación y propuesta educativa.

This open access book presents novel theoretical, empirical and experimental work exploring the nature of mental representations that support natural language production and understanding, and other manifestations of cognition. One fundamental question raised in the text is whether requisite knowledge structures can be adequately modeled by means of a uniform representational format, and if so, what exactly is its nature. Frames are a key topic covered which have had a strong impact on the exploration of knowledge representations in artificial intelligence, psychology and linguistics; cascades are a novel development in frame theory. Other key subject areas explored are: concepts and categorization, the experimental investigation of mental representation, as well as cognitive analysis in semantics. This book is of interest to students, researchers, and professionals working on cognition in the fields of linguistics, philosophy, and psychology.

To date, frame-semantic theory has been applied to various domain-specific discourses, such as legal, economic, and even oenological discourses. Yet, epidemiological crisis communications form a domain-specific discourse tradition which has been left untouched by frame-semanticists. As such, we will conduct a descriptive pilot study which will consider some of the frames present in these texts. To this end, we collected a pilot corpus of Dutch COVID-19-related crisis communications from the Belgian government, which according to previous research (Liégeois, Mathysen 2022) can, in fact, be regarded as epidemiological crisis communications. More concretely, we considered the frames in which five terms – virus, coronavirus, COVID-19, epidemie and pandemie – inherent to this domain could occur and investigated the following three research questions: In which frames do our five target terms resurface within this domain- specific discourse tradition (RQ1)? Which functions do these frames fulfil within this domain-specific discourse tradition and can other domain-specific features (e.g., regarding the FEs of these frames) be found (RQ2)? Can these frames and their functions be linked back to the communicative strategies singled out by previous research on these Belgian epidemiological crisis communications (RQ3)?

International audience ; To date, frame-semantic theory has been applied to various domain-specific discourses, such as legal, economic, and even oenological discourses. Yet, epidemiological crisis communications form a domain-specific discourse tradition which has been left untouched by frame-semanticists. As such, we will conduct a descriptive pilot study which will consider some of the frames present in these texts. To this end, we collected a pilot corpus of Dutch COVID-19-related crisis communications from the Belgian government, which according to previous research (Liégeois, Mathysen 2022) can, in fact, be regarded as epidemiological crisis communications. More concretely, we considered the frames in which five terms-virus, coronavirus, COVID-19, epidemie and pandemie-inherent to this domain could occur and investigated the following three research questions: In which frames do our five target terms resurface within this domainspecific discourse tradition (RQ1)? Which functions do these frames fulfil within this domain-specific discourse tradition and can other domain-specific features (e.g., regarding the FEs of these frames) be found (RQ2)? Can these frames and their functions be linked back to the communicative strategies singled out by previous research on these Belgian epidemiological crisis communications (RQ3)?

International audience ; To date, frame-semantic theory has been applied to various domain-specific discourses, such as legal, economic, and even oenological discourses. Yet, epidemiological crisis communications form a domain-specific discourse tradition which has been left untouched by frame-semanticists. As such, we will conduct a descriptive pilot study which will consider some of the frames present in these texts. To this end, we collected a pilot corpus of Dutch COVID-19-related crisis communications from the Belgian government, which according to previous research (Liégeois, Mathysen 2022) can, in fact, be regarded as epidemiological crisis communications. More concretely, we considered the frames in which five terms-virus, coronavirus, COVID-19, epidemie and pandemie-inherent to this domain could occur and investigated the following three research questions: In which frames do our five target terms resurface within this domainspecific discourse tradition (RQ1)? Which functions do these frames fulfil within this domain-specific discourse tradition and can other domain-specific features (e.g., regarding the FEs of these frames) be found (RQ2)? Can these frames and their functions be linked back to the communicative strategies singled out by previous research on these Belgian epidemiological crisis communications (RQ3)?

Die innovative Studie wendet Verfahren der linguistisch-semantischen Frame-Analyse auf die Rekonstruktion komplexer fachlich-institutioneller Begriffe in der Domäne "Recht" an und diskutiert intensiv die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen dieser Methode. Es werden Begriffe und Begriffsnetze aus den Rechtsgebieten Strafrecht und Bürgerliches Recht analysiert und frame-semantisch rekonstruiert; dabei werden z.T. auch konkurrierende Begriffsdeutungen und diachrone Begriffsentwicklungen mit erfasst.Die Studie leistet Pionierarbeit, da bisher keine anderen Publikationen vorliegen, die auch praktisch-empirisch Bedeutungs- und Begriffswissens-Frames so umfassend und intensiv beschreiben und frame-semantisch darstellen wie hier. Die Aspekte und Probleme einer solchen korpusgestützt und empirisch detailliert arbeitenden Frame-Analyse werden ausführlich dokumentiert und diskutiert. Sie zeigen die Leistungsfähigkeit dieser Methode (aber auch, wo ihre Grenzen liegen). Insofern kann diese Arbeit Vorbild für ähnlich orientierte Studien auch zu anderen Sprachgebrauchs- und Wissens-Domänen sein, und das geplante Buch deshalb auf das Interesse anderer in diesem Feld tätiger Forscherinnen und Forscher stoßen.

In diesem Beitrag wird korpusbasiert, qualitativ und aus kontrastiver Sicht anhand ausgewählter Einzelbeispiele untersucht, welchen Beitrag die Frame-Semantik bei der Analyse konzeptueller Metaphern im aktuellen Migrationsdiskurs in der deutschen und italienischen Presse leisten kann. Sie macht es möglich, unterschiedliche Perspektivierungen bei der Betrachtung des Phänomens herauszukristallisieren, da semantische Frames ein facettenreiches Angebot für den Blickwinkel der Betrachtung bereitstellen. Auch Metaphern selbst besitzen diese Eigenschaft der Perspektivierung, vor allem auch solche, die charakteristisch für einen kulturspezifischen Kontext stehen. Zu den Möglichkeiten, die der Einsatz von Metaphern bietet, zählt vor allem der "Highlighting und Hiding"-Effekt (LAKOFF/JOHNSON 1980), indem Metaphern bestimmte Aspekte betonen oder verdunkeln. Um welche es sich dabei im Einzelnen handelt, hängt von mehreren Faktoren ab, wie zum Beispiel der politischen Orientierung von Journalisten oder Politikern oder der wirtschaftlichen Lage eines Landes. ; This article presents a corpus-based, qualitative and contrastive analysis of the contribution that frame semantics can make in the analysis of conceptual metaphors within the current debate on migrant issues, with selected examples taken from the German and Italian press. The use of frame semantics makes it possible to observe any given phenomenon from a number of different perspectives, a characteristic that is also typical of metaphors, and especially of those rooted in the cultural context of a specific linguistic community. This is achieved through the so-called "Highlighting and Hiding" effect (LAKOFF/JOHNSON 1980) of metaphors, by means of which some features are placed in the spotlight while others remain in the dark. Factors that influence which elements will be highlighted and/or which will be hidden include the political orientation of the journalists or politicians involved or the political situation of the country as a whole.

Subjects, Speakers, and Roles -- Deep Structure as Logical Form -- Troubles about Actions -- Act -- Some Problems Concerning the Logic of Grammatical Modifiers -- Pragmatics and Intensional Logic -- General Semantics -- On the Frame of Reference -- Naming and Necessity -- Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions -- Pragmatics -- The Semantics of Modal Notions and the Indeterminacy of Ontology -- Opacity, Coreference, and Pronouns -- Methodological Reflections on Current Linguistic Theory -- Grammar and Philosophy -- Analytic/Synthetic and Semantic Theory -- A Program for Syntax -- A Program for Logic -- Linguistics and Natural Logic -- Semantical Archaeology: A Parable -- On the Semantics of the Ought-To-Do -- Inference and Self-Reference -- What Is Said -- The Role of Inductive Reasoning in the Interpretation of Metaphor -- Probabilistic Grammars for Natural Languages -- Addenda to Saul A. Kripke's Paper 'Naming and Necessity'.

Entgegen traditionellen Vorstellungen, die bisher davon ausgingen, dass der politische Prozess und politisches Denken wesentlich durch objektive Faktenlage und vernunftgemäßes Handeln bestimmt seien, vertritt die Autorin Elisabeth Wehling die Auffassung, dass "gedankliche Deutungsrahmen […], Frames genannt" den politischen Diskurs nicht nur beeinflussen, sondern sogar "entscheiden".

Unter linguistisch-epistemologischen Vorzeichen widmet sich der Band zentralen Aspekten der Trias Sprache, Wissen und Diskurs. Dies geschieht in systematischer Auseinandersetzung mit dem vielschichtigen Konzept einer linguistischen Epistemologie.Im Einzelnen stehen folgende Forschungsfelder im Vordergrund: historische Semantik und Frame-Semantik; bedeutungstheoretische Grundlagen; Sprache und (Welt-)Wissen, Sprache als Medium der Wirklichkeitskonstruktion; Sprachtheorie und Sprachverstehenstheorien: verstehensrelevantes Wissen, linguistische Hermeneutik; Rechtslinguistik; Diskurstheorie und diskurssemantische Analysen; öffentlicher Sprachgebrauch: semantische Grundfiguren, politische "Begriffe".Die AutorInnen des Sammelbandes greifen unterschiedliche Gesichtspunkte aus diesen zusammenhängenden Feldern auf, um zu zeigen, wie einerseits theoretische, methodologische und empirische Aspekte einer linguistischen Epistemologie zur fruchtbaren Weiterentwicklung der Germanistischen Linguistik beigetragen haben und in welche Richtungen diese andererseits ausgebaut wie auch empirisch erprobt werden (können).