Suchergebnisse

There is almost no step in the research process in epidemiology in which ethical issues do not exist. Discussed are the values of scientific rigor, balanced against values concerning the interests of the people under study. Ethical issues in epidemiology are illustrated in the choice of research questions; in the choice of study designs to explore the questions; in the maintenace of confidentiality; in obtaining the participation of populations; in experimental studies; & in giving or withdrawing treatment. Institutional controls on research exact a price. They limit scientific study in various ways. Scientists' concerns are not always in harmony with those of other interest groups; but scientists must appeal to policymakers to temper controls on research with a regard for the scientific ideal of free inquiry. Modified HA.

The relationship between public health practice and the fulfilment of the right to health is often assumed to be synergistic. With the goal of understanding how exactly this relationship happens, I studied the everyday practice of epidemiology in Guatemala, seeking to understand how it shapes and is shaped by the notion of health as a human right. Here I present findings from my ethnographic investigation of the Guatemalan Centro Nacional de Epidemiología (National Epidemiology Center), created in 2004 with the explicit mission of contributing to fulfilling the right to health for the inhabitants of Guatemala. While the relationship between epidemiological practice and the right to health is influenced by the specific configuration of local and transnational flows (bureaucratic, economic, ideological, political, scientific, social, and symbolic), epidemiologists also play an important mediating role. There are four intermediate social mechanisms that shape the relevance of epidemiological practice to fulfilling the right to health in Guatemala. Given how the country's economic and social inequalities translate into enormous health inequities, an epidemiological practice committed to the right to health should aspire to transform, rather than reproduce, the social hierarchies underlying such inequalities. The mechanisms I identified shape how epidemiological practice contributes to the reproduction or transformation of such hierarchies. These mechanisms shape what I call 'neocolonial epidemiology', and include: institutional chaos, disciplinary conformism, global health international relations, and social relations at the national level.

Although epidemiology as a scientific study of disease in populations claimed an independent disciplinary status already in the mid–nineteenth century, its history in the twentieth century can be seen as a continuous and often contentious attempt to define the field's social and intellectual boundaries vis-à-vis a variety of neighboring scientific fields and public health practices. In a period dominated by laboratory biomedical sciences, epidemiologists repeatedly tried to spell out how their discipline met the requirements of scientificity despite its focus on disease as a collective phenomenon and its reliance on nonlaboratory methods. This article asks about the relationship between the changing institutional and intellectual contexts of British epidemiological practice and the epidemiologists'attempts to define both science in general and epidemiology in particular. An examination of the epidemiologists'boundary-making endeavors is also used to reflect on the circumstances in which scientists engage in the discourse of disciplinary demarcations.

"This course covers basic epidemiology principles, concepts, and procedures useful in the surveillance and investigation of health-related states or events. It is designed for federal, state, and local government health professionals and private sector health professionals who are responsible for disease surveillance or investigation. A basic understanding of the practices of public health and biostatistics is recommended. " - p. viii ; Lesson One: Introduction to Epidemiology -- Lesson Two: Summarizing Data -- Lesson Three: Measures of Risk -- Lesson Four: Displaying Public Health Data -- Lesson Five: Public Health Surveillance -- Lesson Six: Investigating an Outbreak -- Glossary ; "Technical content: Richard Dicker, lead author; FaÌ?tima Coronado, Denise Koo, Roy Gibson Parrish." - p. v. ; Second edition published 1992 as Principles of epidemiology : an introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics (Self-study course ; 3030-G). ; Also available via the World Wide Web. ; Includes bibliographical references.

There is almost no step in the research process in epidemiology in which ethical issues do not exist. In this paper we follow the thread of our own experience in balancing values of scientific rigor against values concerning the interests of the people under study. Ethical issues in epidemiology are illustrated in the choice of research ques tions ; in the choice of study designs to explore the ques tions; in the maintenance of confidentiality; in obtaining the participation of populations; in experimental studies; and the giving or withdrawing of treatment.

Social epidemiology is the study of how the social world influences - and in many cases defines - the fundamental determinants of health. This second edition elevates the field again, first by codifying the last decade of research, then by extending it to examine how public policies impact health

Looking to the future of the ever-evolving field of psychiatric epidemiology, this new edition covers the many advances in the field since the release of the first. With new content on key topics from bioethics to life course epidemiology, this new edition will continue to be an invaluable reference for clinicians in practice and in training.

The concept of popular epidemiology is updated by examining it as a form of citizen science and a type of social movement. As a citizen science, popular epidemiology is a lay way of knowing that is based in part on an appropriation of expert knowledge by non-experts. As a social movement, popular epidemiology is a mobilization of citizens around the goal of identifying and ameliorating environmental stressors and local illness patterns. The updated concept of popular epidemiology shows the important influences of the environmental justice movement and of critical epidemiology among professional epidemiologists. Case study materials are provided to illustrate arguments.

To date, much of the empirical work in social epidemiology has demonstrated the existence of health inequalities along a number of axes of social differentiation. However, this research, in isolation, will not inform effective solutions to health inequalities. Rethinking Social Epidemiology provides an expanded vision of social epidemiology as a science of change, one that seeks to better address key questions related to both the causes of social inequalities in health (problem-focused research) as well as the implementation of interventions to alleviate conditions of marginalization and pover