Suchergebnisse

ABSTRACT In this paper, T.G. Makarov and E.V. Kobchikova considered digital rights in the system of objects of civil legal relations. The features of digital rights are highlighted. The authors emphasize that digital rights can consolidate rights of various types, in particular, rights to things, property rights, intellectual rights, etc. The application of all these rights is possible using electronic tools in the appropriate information system. The authors concluded that the consolidation of digital rights in russian legislation is terminologically not quite accurate, as well as their assignment to the number of objects of civil rights is not entirely accurate.

ABSTRACT In this paper, T.G. Makarov and E.V. Kobchikova considered digital rights in the system of objects of civil legal relations. The features of digital rights are highlighted. The authors emphasize that digital rights can consolidate rights of various types, in particular, rights to things, property rights, intellectual rights, etc. The application of all these rights is possible using electronic tools in the appropriate information system. The authors concluded that the consolidation of digital rights in russian legislation is terminologically not quite accurate, as well as their assignment to the number of objects of civil rights is not entirely accurate.RESUMEN En este artículo, T.G. Makarov y E.V. Kobchikova consideraron los derechos digitales en el sistema de objetos de relaciones legales civiles. Se destacan las características de los derechos digitales. Los autores señalan que los derechos digitales pueden consolidar derechos de diversa índole, en particular, derechos sobre las cosas, derechos de propiedad, derechos intelectuales, etc. La aplicación de todos estos derechos es posible utilizando herramientas electrónicas en el sistema de información adecuado. Los autores concluyeron que la consolidación de los derechos digitales en la legislación rusa no es terminológicamente del todo precisa, así como su asignación al número de objetos de derechos civiles tampoco lo es.

Australians are some of the world's greatest users of social media and mobile broadband, and our nation is in the top ten globally for internet use. At a time when our use of these technologies is increasingly redefining aspects of our personal and professional lives, Digital Rights in Australia explores urgent questions about the nature of our rights now and into the future. The analysis covers rights issues in four areas: privacy, profiling and analytics; government data-matching and surveillance; workplace change; and freedom of expression and speech regulation. It explores the ethical and legal challenges we face in using digital, networked technologies and the debates we are having about how to best manage their transformative impacts. Crucially this study examines the major role of private, transnational digital platforms in reshaping the way we work, study and conduct business, our interactions with government and with each other. The program of research which generated the Digital Rights in Australia report has three aims: • to assess the evolving citizen uses of digital platforms, and associated digital rights and responsibilities in Australia and Asia, identifying key dynamics and issues of voice, participation, marginalisation and exclusion; • to develop a framework for establishing the rights and legitimate expectations which platform stakeholders––particularly everyday users––should enjoy and the responsibilities they may bear; • to identify the best models for governance arrangements for digital platforms and for using these environments as social resources in political, social and cultural change. This report draws on three sources of data: a national survey of the attitudes and opinions of 1600 Australians on key rights issues; focus group discussion of related rights scenarios; and analysis of legal, policy and governance issues, illustrated by case studies. The core findings are grouped in chapter order. ; University of Sydney Sydney Research Excellence Initiative (SREI).

Sudan's internet shutdowns bypass legal frameworks, raising concerns about human rights and highlighting the growing influence of decentralized technologies like Starlink.

Sudan's conflict has crippled telecommunication as both sides leverage and disrupt internet services to gain control.

Jordan's controversial new cybercrime law, now ratified by the king, may have serious consequences for freedom of expression, political participation, and the digital economy.

Digitalization has become omnipresent today. No longer limited to the security sphere, digital technologies are actively transforming society as a whole. However, the conservative institution of law does not always respond promptly to changes, and many lawyers believe that the traditional legislation in force is sufficient to handle this new object of regulation. Yet the fact is that this object cannot be called traditional from the regulatory standpoint. Technology has a powerful impact on both law and the state and so requires new solutions. Under such circumstances, it is important to gain a legal understanding of digitalization without delay. The purpose of this article is to analyze the current state of legal regulation of digital technologies in Russia. By employing classical legal methods for analyzing doctrine, legislation and jurisprudence, the author comes to the conclusion that digital law is a new branch of law. At the same time, its most significant aspect is the regulation of digital rights — subjective rights associated with the use of digital technologies. Despite the neutral and universal character of technologies, a comparative legal approach allows us to identify the specific features of Russian digital law, as well as the nuances of the regulation and protection of digital rights in Russia. The present article reflects the author's position and strives to inspire further discussion about these issues.

Über die Hälfte des Internetverkehrs wird von Bots generiert. Diese automatisierten Programme verarbeiten große Mengen an digitalen Inhalten, was zu Urheberrechtsverletzungen führen kann. Um die Nutzung durch Bots zu regeln, müssen Urheber die Nutzungsbedingungen in einer maschinenlesbaren Form bereitstellen. Das Robots Exclusion Protocol bietet einen interessengerechten Ansatz zur Steuerung von Bots im Vergleich zu etablierten technischen Schutzmaßnahmen.Die Arbeit beleuchtet auch die rechtlichen Grenzen der automatisierten Rechtsdurchsetzung durch Smart Contracts im Kontext der zunehmenden Nutzung dieser Technologie zur Durchsetzung von Nutzungsbestimmungen