A Constitutional Principle
In: Public Administration and Public Policy; The Politics-Administration Dichotomy, S. 137-166
10047 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Public Administration and Public Policy; The Politics-Administration Dichotomy, S. 137-166
Discussion paper of the ANC Constitutional Committee on constitutional principles and the structure of a future constitution, based on earlier papers ("What is a constitution?", and "A draft Bill of Rights") and the subsequent discussion process within the ANC-alliance. (DÜI-Eng)
World Affairs Online
In: Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften: ZSE ; der öffentliche Sektor im internationalen Vergleich = Journal for comparative government and European policy, Band 5, Heft 3-4
ISSN: 1612-7013
In: Zeitschrift für Staats- und Europawissenschaften: ZSE ; der öffentliche Sektor im internationalen Vergleich = Journal for comparative government and european policy, Band 5, Heft 3/4, S. 584-601
ISSN: 1610-7780
World Affairs Online
In: Recent Trends in German and European Constitutional Law; Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, S. 1-35
In: Forthcoming in N. Des Rosiers, P. Macklem & P. Oliver (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)
SSRN
In: Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, Heft 117, S. 54-58
This paper deals with the study of the justification of constitutional principles as a fundamental category of constitutional law. Legal principles are an important conception in the legal doctrine and the legal practice of democratic countries. Ukrainian legal doctrine studies legal principles in the two paradigms, namely fundamental principles and general principles. However, this approach does not result in the understanding of principles in constitutional law. That is why principles in constitutional law are an actual topic. The article aims to examine the fundamental concepts to find the justifications of constitutional principles. Hence, the author pays attention to the content of constitutional law and constitutionalism as principles-based categories. First, constitutional law is a fundamental part of the law in the legal system, and all the parts of the law are dependent on constitutional law. Second, the universal constitutional principles are the same for all legal systems. After all, constitutionalism doctrine consists of the limitation of power, and nowadays, this is expressed through the constitution and different constitution principles. The author uses comparative legal, phenomenological, and system-structural analysis as a valid methodology for this research. Finally, the research investigation contains the following conclusions that enable the author to prove the motivation of the science paper to study the outlined topic. First, constitutional law is the basis of the legal system, which embodies constitutional principles; constitutional law has the same effect on public law and private law. Second, constitutionalism is a source for finding constitutional principles. Third, the system of constitutional principles includes the following characteristics: universality and specificity. The system of constitutional principles is open and depends on the interpretation of constitutions. The paper aims to contribute to the growing research highlighting the current issues of constitutional principles. Keywords: principles, constitutional principles, constitutional law, constitutionalism, the system of constitutional principles.
In: (2019) 67 American Journal of Comparative Law 899
SSRN
In: Queen's Law Journal, Band 27, S. 389-443
SSRN
In: Richard Albert, Derek O'Brien and Se-shauna Wheatle (eds), Oxford Handbook of Caribbean Constitutions (OUP 2020)
SSRN
In: Politics in Germany, S. 77-103
In: Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law, Markus D Dubber and Tatjana Hoernle, eds., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
SSRN
In: University of Cincinnati Law Review, Forthcoming
SSRN
SSRN
In: Schiek , D 2010 , ' Constitutional Principles and Horizontal Effects: Kücükdeveci revisited ' , European Labour Law Journal , vol. 1 , no. 3 , pp. 368-379 .
While German labour lawyers were still awaiting the German Constitutional Court's final verdict on the principles established by the Mangold case, the Court of Justice of the European Union re-visited the question what exactly are the effects of Directive 2000/78 and the constitutional principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age. This article analyses the constitutional relevance of this case in two respects. First, it argues that the Court has accepted neither direct horizontal effects of directives nor direct effects of constitutional principles, but rather - much more cautiously - reiterated the rule that directives on constitutional principles such as non-discrimination can exclude the application of national legislation in horizontal cases. The article also demonstrates that this cautious approach has succeeded in convincing the German Constitutional Court that the Mangold judgment was not ultra vires. Consequently, the claim challenging that judgment was dismissed and a constitutional crisis avoided.
BASE