Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
1577360 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
In: Forthcoming in: von Bogdandy, Schmidt-Aßmann (eds), Theorizing Comparative Public Law (Nomos)
SSRN
In: European journal of international law, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 917-925
ISSN: 0938-5428
In: Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht: ZaöRV = Heidelberg journal of international law : HJIL, Band 83, Heft 2, S. 209-256
In: 14 Asian Journal of Comparative Law S11 (2019)
SSRN
Working paper
Blog: Völkerrechtsblog
The post 100 Years of Research in Comparative Public Law and International Law appeared first on Völkerrechtsblog.
In: World Court Digest, Formerly Fontes Iuris Gentium 4
"The World Court Digest" continues the "Fontes Iuris Gentium", a series that presents the decisions of the Permanent Court of International Justice and the International Court of Justice up to 2000. The new volume covers the period from 2001 to 2005. All important pronouncements of the Court in its judgments and advisory opinions are systematically arranged under specific topics taken from substantive and procedural international law. "The World Court Digest" provides reliable access to the decisions of the most significant international judicial organ on question
In: International review of the Red Cross: humanitarian debate, law, policy, action, Band 12, Heft 139, S. 582-583
ISSN: 1607-5889
In: Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge: débat humanitaire, droit, politiques, action = International Review of the Red Cross, Band 54, Heft 646, S. 642-643
ISSN: 1607-5889
In: European journal of international law, Band 22, Heft 3, S. 917-925
ISSN: 1464-3596
In: University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper No. 2020-013
SSRN
Working paper
This chapter outlines some basic approaches to identifying frameworks of comparative research. It first argues that establishing comparative frameworks is a task ubiquitous to legal methodology. The framework is the decisive factor identifying the comparators and allowing assessment of similarities and differences. The framework allows identification of what to compare, how many commonalities the comparators have to start with, and how 'foreign' the two elements subject to comparison may be, so as to facilitate meaningful comparison. The chapter thus shows how comparative frameworks are flexible in serving the objectives defined by comparative scholars. This fluid feature of the framework of comparison and the relatively ubiquitous nature of the comparative method is the backdrop to the discussions in this chapter, critically reviewing three major frameworks identified by the objectives of the comparative approach: law as 'category', as 'source', and as 'variable'.
BASE