Suchergebnisse

A comprehensive General Plan for Coconino County containing the following: county profile, forecast and projection, land use, circulation, public facilities and services, open space and recreation, and implementation of the plan. Coconino County Planning and Zoning Regular Meeting with a resolution related to zoning Coconino Country and a petition filed against Summit Property, Inc. Two Planning and Zoning Regular meeting agendas containing votes, on resolutions concerning Hart Prairie. A supplemental statement in opposition to the latest request by Summit Property, Inc. for approval of a zoning change is included. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

A statement submitted by Walter and Nancy Taylor, in opposition to the latest zoning request by Summit Properties in regards to their land in Hart Prarie, Coconino County, Arizona, 1974. Also includes a statement on behalf of the Coconino Citizens Association in opposition to the General Plan for Coconino County, 1975. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

A statement submitted by Walter and Nancy Taylor, in opposition to the latest zoning request by Summit Properties in regards to their land in Hart Prarie, Coconino County, Arizona, 1974. Also includes a statement on behalf of the Coconino Citizens Association in opposition to the General Plan for Coconino County, 1975. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

CONTENT: Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission Transcript of Proceedings: Public Hearing referencing development of Hart Prairie. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

A questionnaire from the Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Hart Prairie and a questionnaire from the Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission, regarding the "Save the Peaks" controversy. The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The Object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

CONTENT: Media clippings from the Arizona Daily Sun related to the court case (Wilson v. Summit Properties Inc.). Topics reported on include: Snow Bowl, Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission, Hart Prairie, San Francisco Peaks, United States Forest Service, Friends of the Peaks, and Summit Properties Inc. Comments and feedback associated with proposed draft of planning and zoning of the Arizona Snow Bowl recreational area. Newspaper articles reprinted with permission from the Arizona Daily Sun . BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

CONTENT: Volume one of Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission Transcript Proceedings: Public Hearing on rezoning of Hart Prairie. Topics include land use and function, construction, and development for business and recreation. Speakers discuss balance between private ownership, public domain, Native American spiritual and religious aspects, and the business community's interests. BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORY: The 'Save the Peaks' fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the 'Save the Peaks' controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Volume two of Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission Transcript Proceedings: Public Hearing on rezoning of Hart Praire. Topics include land use and function, construction, and development for business and recreation. Speakers discuss balance between private ownership, public domain, Native American spiritual and religious aspects, and the business community's interests. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Public documents include letters and petitions for and against further development of the Arizona Snow Bowl, Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission records over rezoning, information regarding the U.S. Forest Service's Decision concerning the sale and development of the land adjacent to the skiing and recreational area, and a recent history of Arizona Snow Bowl. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Public documents include letters and petitions for and against further development of the Arizona Snow Bowl, Coconino County Planning and Zoning Commission records over rezoning, information regarding the U.S. Forest Service's Decision concerning the sale and development of the land adjacent to the skiing and recreational area, and a recent history of Arizona Snow Bowl. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Investigation memorandum and accompanying material on the Wilson v. Summit Property Inc. Documents include: resolutions 3, 4, 67, 155, 10-7 which were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of Coconino County, draft complaint filed in Superior Court of The State of Arizona of Wilson v. Board of Supervisors and Clerk of Coconino Country, draft statement of facts in Wilson v. Summit Property Inc., and an appeal from the case of Queen Creek Land & Cattle Corporation v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.

Investigation memorandum and accompanying material on the Wilson v. Summit Property Inc. Documents include: resolutions 3, 4, 67, 155, 10-7 which were approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission of Coconino County, draft complaint filed in Superior Court of The State of Arizona of Wilson v. Board of Supervisors and Clerk of Coconino Country, draft statement of facts in Wilson v. Summit Property Inc., and an appeal from the case of Queen Creek Land & Cattle Corporation v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors. NOTE: The "Save the Peaks" fight was a decade-long struggle, originally pitting local citizens against Summit Properties and its parent corporation, the Post Company. The object of the controversy was a 350 acre parcel of land in the Hart Prairie area of the San Francisco Peaks. In the early 1970's, local Flagstaff citizens united to prevent the company's proposed development of the Hart Prairie acreage. During the course of the controversy, the citizens of Flagstaff and Summit Properties became allies against the United States Forest Service (USFS). Both groups felt the USFS, guardians of American public forest lands, extended the "Save the Peaks" controversy for many years by neither cooperating nor negotiating in good faith with either the citizens of Flagstaff or Summit Properties.