Suchergebnisse

Seit dem Abschluß des Vertrages mit der Republik Tatarstan vom 15. Februar 1994 hat Rußland eine Reihe von bilateralen Verträgen mit Subjekten der Russischen Föderation abgeschlossen, deren Charakter und Inhalt in dem Beitrag vergleichend untersucht werden. Während zahlreiche Experten den asymmetrischen Charakter des russischen Föderalismus für eine Quelle politischer Instabilität halten, vertritt der Verfasser des Artikels die Ansicht, daß gerade die asymmetrische Struktur der von ihm untersuchten bilateralen Verträge es der russischen Zentralmacht erlaubt, den Unterschieden in der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, strategischen Lage, Kultur und Ethnizität der einzelnen Republiken und Regionen gerecht zu werden und sezessionistische Tendenzen - mit der Ausnahme Tschetscheniens - erfolgreich zu verhindern. (BIOst-Mrk)

Until recently, the view that new states start life unencumbered by the treaties which applied to their territories before independence has been almost universally and, too often, one might add, uncritically accepted. An exception, often explained away as only apparent, was made for "localized" treaties. And in the past fifteen or twenty years, the case for the continued force of multilateral "lawmaking" treaties has been pressed; this would be a real exception to the general clean-slate rule. Unless a bilateral treaty could be characterized as "localized," however, the new state, according to the prevailing opinion, was freed of any continuing obligation by the act of becoming independent.

Bilateral agreements signed or that entered into force between 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019 and; Multilateral agreements signed/acceded/ratified or that entered into force between 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019.
Please note: The information contained in this document reflects the records in the South African Treaty Register as at the date of search, or the date of this document, whichever is applicable. While every reasonable effort is made to ensure the correctness of the information contained herein, parties relying thereon are advised to verify important facts independently in the event that the information is required for critical purposes.

Bilateral agreements signed or that entered into force between 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 and; Multilateral agreements signed/acceded/ratified or that entered into force between 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021.
Please note: The information contained in this document reflects the records in the South African Treaty Register as at the date of search, or the date of this document, whichever is applicable. While every reasonable effort is made to ensure the correctness of the information contained herein, parties relying thereon are advised to verify important facts independently in the event that the information is required for critical purposes.

This is a major work investigating China's bilateral investment treaties (BITs) regime through various approaches including textual analysis, case study, comparative study and empirical study. This book tries to unveil some of the puzzles in Chinese BITs. The general consensus is that the evolution of China's BIT regime has its underlying logic, which follows an investment liberalization trend and fits China's changing role from a key capital-importing state to a major capital-exporting state. A similar trend is evident in Chinese BIT-making and BIT policy. This book investigates these theoretical assumptions and looks into some of the loopholes in Chinese BITs.