Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
2207 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
German Administrative Jurisdiction
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 173-183
ISSN: 1461-7226
International Administrative Jurisdictions
In: Progress in Public Administration, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 67-88
Administrative Jurisdiction in Germany
In: Economica, Heft 20, S. 179
Administrative law and administrative jurisdiction
In: Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Band 20, S. 99-104
Bentham on administrative jurisdiction
In: Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Band 21, S. 198-204
La gestion d'une reforme (Administrative Jurisdiction Management)
In: Revue française d'administration publique: publication trimestrielle, Heft 57, S. 77
ISSN: 0152-7401
The Recent Evolution of Administrative Jurisdictions in France
In: Progress in Public Administration, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 859-860
Administracinės jurisdikcijos ištakos Lietuvoje ; The beginning of administrative jurisdiction in Lithuania
In numerous sources of administrative law of interwar Lithuania the major role was given to a monetary fine. Furthermore, legislative acts also provided for administrative sanctions that restricted special rights (e.g. rights allowing engaging in certain activities etc.). The right of administrative punishment was provided for different authorities, from ministers to ordinary policemen; however, the biggest jurisdictional powers were vested in the county governor. We may claim that the growth of jurisdictional powers of administrative authorities in interwar Lithuania was based exceptionally on feasibility arguments. While solving the problems of criminal justice resulting from work overload of courts and aiming to ensure public order in the state and lawfulness in general, administrative sanctions were regarded to be efficient and appropriate measures to achieve these aims. Administrative punishment compensated for the things that were impossible to implement by jurisdictional activities of courts.
BASE
Administracinės jurisdikcijos ištakos Lietuvoje ; The beginning of administrative jurisdiction in Lithuania
In numerous sources of administrative law of interwar Lithuania the major role was given to a monetary fine. Furthermore, legislative acts also provided for administrative sanctions that restricted special rights (e.g. rights allowing engaging in certain activities etc.). The right of administrative punishment was provided for different authorities, from ministers to ordinary policemen; however, the biggest jurisdictional powers were vested in the county governor. We may claim that the growth of jurisdictional powers of administrative authorities in interwar Lithuania was based exceptionally on feasibility arguments. While solving the problems of criminal justice resulting from work overload of courts and aiming to ensure public order in the state and lawfulness in general, administrative sanctions were regarded to be efficient and appropriate measures to achieve these aims. Administrative punishment compensated for the things that were impossible to implement by jurisdictional activities of courts.
BASE
Europäisch-amerikanischer Musterkodex für die Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit (Euro-American Model Code of Administrative Jurisdiction)
In: In: PERLINGEIRO, Ricardo; SOMMERMANN, Karl-Peter (Org.). Euro-American Model Code of Administrative Jurisdiction. Niterói: Eduff, 2014. p. 44-63
SSRN
Code modèle euro-américain de juridiction administrative (Euro-American Model Code of Administrative Jurisdiction)
In: In: PERLINGEIRO, Ricardo; SOMMERMANN, Karl-Peter (Org.). Euro-American Model Code of Administrative Jurisdiction. Niterói: Eduff, 2014. p. 25-43.
SSRN
Paradoxes and Irrational in the Activity of Subjects of Administrative Jurisdiction of Russia
In: The Topical Issues of Public Law, No. 3, March 2012
SSRN
Niemieckie sądownictwo administracyjne w ujęciu prawnoporównawczym ; The German Administrative Jurisdiction in European Comparative Law
This study is devoted to analysing the structural decisions related to the administrative jurisdiction in Germany in comparison with other European countries. It focuses, in particular, on the institutional structure of the administrative jurisdiction and the functions associated with it to it. Different understanding of the scope of the administrative jurisdiction pre-determine how individual regulations of administrative procedural law are designed, for example, regulations concerning access to courts and the judicial powers of the administrative courts. Therefore, the article aims to demonstrate – from a comparative legal perspective – the processes of mutual interaction, namely how the structural decisions made about the administrative jurisdiction have been received, and to highlight the different developmental trends characteristic of individual countries. ; pracowanie poświęcone jest analizie decyzji strukturalnych dotyczących sądownictwa administracyjnego w Niemczech na tle innych krajów europejskich. Koncentruje się w szczególności na strukturze instytucjonalnej sądownictwa administracyjnego i związanych z nim funkcjach. Odmienne rozumienie zakresu sądownictwa administracyjnego przesądza o kształcie poszczególnych przepisów administracyjnego prawa procesowego, np. regulacji dotyczących dostępu do sądów i kompetencji orzeczniczej sądów administracyjnych. Dlatego niniejszy artykuł ma na celu ukazanie – z perspektywy prawnoporównawczej – procesów wzajemnego oddziaływania, czyli sposobu przyjęcia decyzji strukturalnych dotyczących sądownictwa administracyjnego oraz zwrócenie uwagi na różne tendencje rozwojowe charakterystyczne dla poszczególnych krajów.
BASE
The German Administrative Jurisdiction in European Comparative Law ; Niemieckie sądownictwo administracyjne w ujęciu prawnoporównawczym
This study is devoted to analysing the structural decisions related to the administrative jurisdiction in Germany in comparison with other European countries. It focuses, in particular, on the institutional structure of the administrative jurisdiction and the functions associated with it to it. Different understanding of the scope of the administrative jurisdiction pre-determine how individual regulations of administrative procedural law are designed, for example, regulations concerning access to courts and the judicial powers of the administrative courts. Therefore, the article aims to demonstrate – from a comparative legal perspective – the processes of mutual interaction, namely how the structural decisions made about the administrative jurisdiction have been received, and to highlight the different developmental trends characteristic of individual countries. ; Opracowanie poświęcone jest analizie decyzji strukturalnych dotyczących sądownictwa administracyjnego w Niemczech na tle innych krajów europejskich. Koncentruje się w szczególności na strukturze instytucjonalnej sądownictwa administracyjnego i związanych z nim funkcjach. Odmienne rozumienie zakresu sądownictwa administracyjnego przesądza o kształcie poszczególnych przepisów administracyjnego prawa procesowego, np. regulacji dotyczących dostępu do sądów i kompetencji orzeczniczej sądów administracyjnych. Dlatego niniejszy artykuł ma na celu ukazanie – z perspektywy prawnoporównawczej – procesów wzajemnego oddziaływania, czyli sposobu przyjęcia decyzji strukturalnych dotyczących sądownictwa administracyjnego oraz zwrócenie uwagi na różne tendencje rozwojowe charakterystyczne dla poszczególnych krajów.
BASE