Suchergebnisse

Although hunting rights constitute the key element of Polish hunting law, so far they have not been subject to detailed analysis in legal writings devoted to the subject. This is most likely due to the fact, that the term itself is not used in the hunting legislation. The article fills this gap. It analyzes the legal nature of hunting rights under Polish law as well as examines legal issues most closely related to this legal institution, namely hunting preserve and hunting lease. Also analyzed is the ownership of game at large, game carcass, hunting trophies and shed antlers. ; Although hunting rights constitute the key element of Polish hunting law, so far they have not been subject to detailed analysis in legal writings devoted to the subject. This is most likely due to the fact, that the term itself is not used in the hunting legislation. The article fills this gap. It analyzes the legal nature of hunting rights under Polish law as well as examines legal issues most closely related to this legal institution, namely hunting preserve and hunting lease. Also analyzed is the ownership of game at large, game carcass, hunting trophies and shed antlers.

The traditional right to hunt has been recognised for some time now by Australian courts and by Parliament as one of the native title rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. I Concomitantly growing community concerns have emerged about the cruelty of common traditional hunting practices. These practices include harpooning and drowning of dugongs; harpooning of turtles or killing them with blows to the head; keeping sea turtles upside down and freshwater turtles in drums for lengthy periods; breaking the necks of mutton bird chicks; and breaking, severing or tethering animals' limbs as a means of control and storage. Increasingly, Indigenous communities are providing leadership by actively promoting more humane hunting methods.

564State immunity — Attachment and execution — Whether property in use for sovereign purposes — Jurisdiction claimed on the basis of ownership of property in use for non-sovereign purposes and therefore subject to execution — Embassy, cultural institute and other property — Whether immune from executionState immunity — Jurisdictional immunity — Distinction between sovereign and non-sovereign activities — Production of nuclear energy — Whether a sovereign activityJurisdiction — Territorial — Tort committed outside jurisdiction — Effects within jurisdiction — Whether municipal courts entitled to exercise jurisdiction — Test of whether proceedings in foreign State impossible or unreasonable — Whether proceedings in Soviet Union would automatically be biased or lead to denial of justiceEnvironment — Action against State regarding environmental damage — Transboundary nuclear pollution — Chernobyl nuclear accident — Whether resident of Austria entitled to compensation for damage to exercise of hunting rights caused by nuclear pollution — The law of Austria