Suchergebnisse

Political journalism comprises one of the most unmistakable spaces of journalism and is basic for the working of the majority rules system. Preferably, political journalism should work as a data supplier, guard dog, and gathering for political conversations, accordingly helping residents cmprehend political issues and help forestall maltreatment of intensity. The degree to which it does is, notwithstanding, discussed. Aside from regularizing beliefs, political journalism is formed by factors at a few degrees of examination, including the framework level, the media authoritative level, and the individual level. Not least significant for political journalism is the nearby, associated, and combative relationship with political entertainers, forming both the cycles and the substance of political news-casting. As far as substance, four key ideas in the examination on political journalism in Western vote-based frameworks are the outlining of governmental issues as a vital game, interpretive versus straight news, struggle to outline and media cynicism, and political or sectarian inclination.

Preface -- Our goal: comparing news performance / Claes de Vreese, Frank Esser, David Nicolas Hopmann, et al. -- How we did it: approach and methods / David Nicolas Hopmann, Frank Esser, Claes de Vreese, et al. -- The explanatory logic: factors that shape political news / Frank Esser, Claes de Vreese, David Nicolas Hopmann, et al. -- Strategy and game framing / Toril Aalberg, Claes de Vreese, and Jesper Strömbäck -- Interpretive journalism / Susana Salgado, Jesper Strömbäck, Toril Aalberg, and Frank Esser -- Negativity / Frank Esser, Sven Engesser, Jörg Matthes, and Rosa Berganza -- Political balance / David Nicolas Hopmann, Peter van Aelst, Susana Salgado, and Guido Legnante -- Personalization / Peter van Aelst, Tamir Sheafer, Nicolas Hubé, and Stylianos Papathanassopoulos -- Hard and soft news / Carsten Reinemann, James Stanyer, and Sebastian Scherr -- Cross-conceptual architecture of news / Carsten Reinemann, Sebastian Scherr, James Stanyer, et al. -- Conclusion: assessing news performance / Claes de Vreese, Carsten Reinemann, Frank Esser, David Nicolas Hopmann, et al

"Political journalism is often under fire. Conventional wisdom and much scholarly research suggest that journalists are cynics and political pundits. Political news is void of substance and overly focused on strategy and persons. Citizens do not learn from the news, are politically cynical, and are dissatisfied with the media. This book challenges these assumptions, which are often based on single-country studies with limited empirical observations about the relation between news production, content, and journalism's effects. Based on interviews with journalists, a systematic content analysis of political news, and panel survey data in different countries, this book tests how different systems and media-politics relations condition the contents of political news. It shows how different content creates different effects, and demonstrates that under the right circumstances citizens learn from political news, do not become cynical, and are satisfied with political journalism"--

Political journalism is often under fire. Conventional wisdom and much scholarly research suggest that journalists are cynics and political pundits. Political news is void of substance and overly focused on strategy and persons. Citizens do not learn from the news, are politically cynical, and are dissatisfied with the media. This book challenges these assumptions, which are often based on single-country studies with limited empirical observations about the relation between news production, content, and journalism's effects. Based on interviews with journalists, a systematic content analysis of political news, and panel survey data in different countries, this book tests how different systems and media-politics relations condition the contents of political news. It shows how different content creates different effects and demonstrates that under the right circumstances citizens learn from political news, do not become cynical, and are satisfied with political journalism

This international edited collection brings together the latest research in political journalism, examining the ideological, commercial and technological forces that are transforming the field and its evolving relationship with news audiences. Comprising 40 original chapters written by scholars from around the world, The Routledge Companion to Political Journalism offers fundamental insights from the disciplines of political science, media, communications and journalism. Drawing on interviews, discourse analysis and quantitative statistical methods, the volume is divided into six parts, each focusing on a major theme in the contemporary study of political journalism. Topics covered include far-right media, populism movements and the media, local political journalism practices, public engagement and audience participation in political journalism, agenda setting, and advocacy and activism in journalism. Chapters draw on case studies from the United Kingdom, Hungary, Russia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Italy, Brazil, the United States, Greece and Spain. The Routledge Companion to Political Journalism is a valuable resource for students and scholars of media studies, journalism studies, political communication and political science.

This article—described by Mr. Cummings, political editor of the London NEWS CHRONICLE, as "a hastily prepared speech, not intended for publication"—is based on a talk before Mr. Tom Clarke's class in Practical Journalism in the University of London King's College.

Signifcant scholarly work suggests mass media professionals largely set the voices in their coverage to mirror that of mainstream government debate. While it is a compelling assertion, this view is only intermittently supported by data. This paper suggests that such theories enjoy inconsistent support because they fail to consider the interaction between journalists' incentives and the political climate. An economic theory is advanced here that the political journalists' objectives to please their superiors, please themselves, limit negative feedback, and expend minimum energy, in other words to minimize their costs and maximize their benefits, lead them to rely on tactics that vary with the scope of consensus support for an issue. This theory is tested by analyzing newspaper coverage of four political issues debated in Congress.

This collection explores practices of political journalism, ranging from America 'civic journalism' to the press corps covering the European Union in Brussels, from Bangkok newsrooms to French and Italian scandal hunters.

Verlagsinfo: "This international edited collection brings together the latest research in political journalism, examining the ideological, commercial, and technological forces that are transforming the field and its evolving relationship with news audiences. Comprised of 40 original chapters written by scholars from around the world, The Routledge Companion to Political Journalism offers fundamental insights from the disciplines of political science, media, communications, and journalism. Drawing on interviews, discourse analysis, and quantitative statistical methods, the volume is divided into six parts, each focusing on a major theme in the contemporary study of political journalism. Topics covered include far-right media, populism movements and the media, local political journalism practices, public engagement and audience participation in political journalism, agenda setting, and advocacy and activism in journalism. Chapters draw on case studies from the UK, Hungary, Russia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Italy, Brazil, the US, Greece, and Spain. The Routledge Companion to Political Journalism is a valuable resource for students and scholars of media studies, journalism studies, political communication, and political science"--