Suchergebnisse

Later published under title: Pora poni︠a︡tʹ. ; Mode of access: Internet.

"Date originated 08/11/78; Date updated 07/31/80." ; Includes bibliographical references. ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Description based on print resource; title from title page.

"Parts of this book are adapted from the writings of Benjamin Franklin and Woodrow Wilson." ; Mode of access: Internet. ; 14

Students from 22 nations answered a survey on the most important events in world history. At the national level, free recalling and a positive evaluation of World War II (WWII) were associated with World Values Survey willingness to fight for the country in a war and being a victorious nation. Willingness to fight, a more benign evaluation of WWII, and recall of WWII were associ- ated with nation-level scores on power distance and low postmaterialism, suggesting that values stressing obedience and competition between nations are associated with support for collective violence, whereas values of expressive individualism are negatively related. Internal political vio- lence was unrelated to willingness to fight, excluding direct learning as an explanation of legit- imization of violence. Recall of wars in general (operationalized by WWI recall) was also unrelated to willingness to fight. Results replicate and extend Archer and Gartner's classic study showing the legitimization of violence by war to the domain of collective ...

a Armorial book-plate: Sir Humphrey Edmund De Trafford, bart. ; By Isaac Basire cf. Brit. mus. Catalogue; Bibl. nat. Ascribed by Halkett & Laing to Pierre Du Moulin, the younger, with mention of Basire and John Bramhall as supposed authors. Ascribed by Wing, Short-title cat., to Pierre Du Mounlin, the elder. ; Translated by Matthew Playford. cf. Halkett & Laing. ; Error in paging: numbers 101-128 omitted. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Letter writer: Morris Brown Jr.; Letter recipient: Maria C. Brown and Morris Brown, Sr. ; Date created: May 22, 1864 ; Primary source material

"On September 21 and 22, 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened a group of 20 experts in the field of community design to discuss raising awareness about the health impact of community design decisions. The gathering included top thought leaders whose organizations represent those who play a direct role in creating the built environment through action and policy--developers, architects, planners, builders, academia, public health professionals, and government officials. Its interdisciplinary nature was both unique and intentional. The workshop was conceived as a result of a series of interviews in September and October 2008 that CDC had conducted with professionals in the public health, planning, and built environment sectors. From these interviews, two key themes emerged: A common concern about health exists, but common language among the disciplines is lacking; Almost no cross-discipline synergy on shared health concerns exists, and local public health professionals are not in the loop at the critical early stages of policy and project development." - p. 4 ; I. Executive Summary -- II. Overview -- III. What is Healthy Community Design? -- IV. Who influences Healthy Community Design/How do they view the current situation and CDC's role? -- V. Where is Healthy Community Design working? -- VI. What steps do we need to take to encourage widespread adoption of industry best practices? -- VII. Tool for evaluating objectively the potential health effects of a project or policy before it is built or implemented: Health Impact Assessments (HIA) -- VIII. The Path forward -- IX. Conclusion ; Mode of access: World Wide Web as an Acrobat .pdf file (566 KB, 52p.).