Suchergebnisse

High urbanization rates in Latin America are accompanied by an increase in women's participation in the labor force and the number of households headed by single mothers. Reliable and affordable childcare alternatives are thus becoming increasingly important in urban areas. The Hogares Comunitarios Program (HCP), established in Guatemala City in 1991, was a direct response to the increasing need of poor urban dwellers for substitute childcare. This government-sponsored pilot program was designed as a strategy to alleviate poverty by providing working parents with low-cost, quality childcare within their community. This paper presents preliminary findings from an evaluation of the HCP carried out in 1998 in urban slums of Guatemala City. The evaluation included both an operations (or process) evaluation and an impact evaluation. Key findings of the operations evaluation are summarized, and preliminary findings of the impact evaluation on children's dietary intakes are presented. Aspects related to the targeting, coverage, and cost of the program are also discussed, and the patterns of childcare use by nonbeneficiary households and their costs are described."" ; Non-PR ; IFPRI1; MP14; Theme 12 ; FCND

The Global Hunger Index (GHI) shows that worldwide progress in reducing hunger remains slow. The 2009 global GHI has fallen by only one quarter from the 1990 GHI. Southeast Asia, the Near East and North Africa, and Latin America and the Caribbean have reduced hunger significantly since 1990, but the GHI remains distressingly high in South Asia, which has made progress since 1990, and in Sub-Saharan Africa, where progress has been marginal. Some countries achieved noteworthy progress in improving their GHI. Between the 1990 GHI and the 2009 GHI, Kuwait, Tunisia, Fiji, Malaysia, and Turkey had the largest percentage improvements. Angola, Ethiopia, Ghana, Nicaragua, and Vietnam saw the largest absolute improvements in their scores. Nonetheless, 29 countries have levels of hunger that are alarming or extremely alarming. The countries with the highest 2009 GHI scores are Burundi, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Sierra Leone. In most of the countries with high GHI scores, war and violent conflict have given rise to widespread poverty and food insecurity. Nearly all of the countries in which the GHI rose since 1990 are in Sub-Saharan Africa. The current food and financial crises, linked in complex ways, will both have implications for food security, financial and economic stability, and political security. The impacts will be greatest on the poor and hungry, and the countries with the highest levels of hunger are also among the most vulnerable to the global downturn. Although the poor and the hungry are in general hurt the most by the food and financial crises, the exact impacts at the household level differ widely. Policy responses to the food and financial crises must take these different impacts into account. Social protection strategies should be designed to mitigate the current shock for the most vulnerable, lay the foundation for sustainable recovery, and prevent negative impacts in the future. Nutrition interventions, such as school feeding programs and programs for early childhood and maternal nutrition, should be strengthened and expanded to ensure universal coverage. An important part of the solution to global hunger is reducing gender inequality. This report compares the 2009 GHI with the 2008 Global Gender Gap Index, which is made up of four subindices: economic participation, educational attainment, political empowerment, and health and survival. The evidence shows that higher levels of hunger are associated with lower literacy rates and access to education for women. High rates of hunger are also linked to health and survival inequalities between men and women. Reducing gender disparities in key areas, particularly in education and health, is thus essential to reduce levels of hunger. ; PR ; IFPRI2; GRP24; Enhanced food and diet quality ; PHND; COM; DGO

The fifth Sustainable Development Goal—to "achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls"—reflects a growing consensus that these are key objectives of development policy in their own right, while also contributing to improved productivity and increased efficiency, especially in agriculture and food production. To deliver on this commitment to women's empowerment in development calls for appropriate measures that can be used to diagnose the scope and major sources of disempowerment and to measure progress. The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) is a survey-based tool codeveloped by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) (Alkire et al. 2013). The index was originally designed as a monitoring and evaluation tool for the U.S. government's Feed the Future initiative to directly capture women's empowerment and inclusion levels in the agricultural sector. Since its launch in February 2012, the WEAI has been implemented in the 19 Feed the Future focus countries. As with any new metric, pilot testing in a few selected countries with limited sample sizes is insufficient to demonstrate how the WEAI would perform when rolled out on a wider scale. Concerns expressed by users of the WEAI led to the creation of an abbreviated version—the A-WEAI. This paper begins by presenting a brief overview of the WEAI and its construction. It then proceeds to discuss (1) the background and motivation behind the creation of the A-WEAI; (2) the steps taken to develop the AWEAI— namely, cognitive testing and piloting of different modules, particularly those that were difficult to administer in the field; (3) analysis of the pilot data from Bangladesh and Uganda; (4) domain-specific comparisons of the different pilot versions; and (5) robustness checks and empowerment diagnostics from the A-WEAI as compared with the original WEAI. The paper concludes by summarizing the modifications to the original WEAI and discussing possibilities for further development of empowerment metrics based on the WEAI. ; Non-PR ; IFPRI1; CRP2; G Cross-cutting gender theme ; PHND; EPTD; PIM ; CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM)

Development is a multi-faceted process; achieving development goals thus requires a multi-sectoral approach. For over two decades, our research group of economists and nutritionists has designed and implemented randomized trials to assess the effectiveness of multisectoral programs in improving nutrition, food security, and other measures of well-being, largely at the request of developing country governments, development partners, and non-governmental organizations. Our approach addresses three perceived pitfalls of RCTs: the "black box" nature of RCTs, limited external validity, and challenges in translation of results to impacts at scale. We address these concerns by identifying and assessing programmatic pathways to impact with quantitative and qualitative methods; studying similar programs implemented by different organizations across various settings; and working closely with implementing partners in the design, research, and dissemination processes to inform adaptation and scale-up of programs and policies.

Die Ergebnisse des Welthunger-Indexes (WHI) zeigen deutlich, dass weiterhin nur geringe Fortschritte bei der globalen Hungerbekämpfung erzielt werden. Die WHI-Werte 2009 sind im Vergleich mit denen des WHI 1990 gerade einmal um ein Viertel gefallen. Südostasien, der Nahe Osten und Nordafrika sowie Lateinamerika und die karibischen Staaten haben den Hunger maßgeblich bekämpfen können. In Südasien konnten zwar seit 1990 Fortschritte gemacht werden, nach wie vor bewegt sich der WHI jedoch auf erschreckend hohem Niveau. Gleiches gilt für Afrika südlich der Sahara, das nur minimale Erfolge bei der Hungerbekämpfung vorweisen kann. Einige Staaten haben bemerkenswerte Fortschritte bei der Bekämpfung des Hungers erzielt: Zwischen 1990 und 2009 erzielten Kuwait, Tunesien, Fidschi, Malaysia und die Türkei die größten prozentualen Verbesserungen. Angola, Äthiopien, Ghana, Nicaragua und Vietnam konnten ihre absoluten Werte im Welthunger-Index deutlich verbessern. Aber immer noch gibt es 29 Staaten, deren Hungerstatus als alarmierend beziehungsweise extrem alarmierend bezeichnet werden muss. Die Länder mit den höchsten WHI-Werten sind Äthiopien, Burundi, die Demokratische Republik Kongo, Eritrea, Sierra Leone und der Tschad. In den meisten Ländern mit hohen WHI-Werten sind es Kriege und gewaltsame Konflikte, die zu einem weiteren Anstieg von Armut und Ernährungsunsicherheit geführt haben. Nahezu alle Staaten, deren WHI-Bewertung sich nach 1990 verschlechtert hat, liegen in Afrika südlich der Sahara. Die Mechanismen der aktuellen Krisen – der Nahrungsmittelpreiskrise und der Finanzkrise – sind eng miteinander verbunden; jede dieser Krisen hat wiederum für sich einen maßgeblichen Einfluss auf Ernährungssicherheit und auf finanzielle und wirtschaftliche sowie politische Stabilität. Die Auswirkungen der Krisen werden vor allem für diejenigen spürbar werden, die ohnehin schon arm sind und an Hunger leiden, und die Staaten mit den höchsten Hungerquoten werden besonders von den Folgen des globalen Abschwungs betroffen sein. Obwohl Arme und Hungernde insgesamt besonders schwer von der Nahrungsmittelpreiskrise und der Finanzkrise betroffen sind, wirken sich die Krisen auf Haushaltsebene sehr unterschiedlich aus. Politische Antworten auf die aktuellen Krisen müssen diese Unterschiede berücksichtigen. Soziale Sicherungsmaßnahmen sollten folglich so gestaltet sein, dass sie tatsächlich diejenigen erreichen, die am härtesten getroffen werden; gleichzeitig müssen sie den Grundstein für eine nachhaltige Verbesserung legen und negativen Folgen in der Zukunft vorbeugen. Bereits bestehende, erfolgreiche Programme, wie Schulspeisungsinitiativen und Aufklärungskampagnen zur Ernährung von Müttern und Kindern, sollten unterstützt und weltweit umgesetzt werden. Ein zentraler Aspekt beim Kampf gegen den Hunger ist die Gleichberechtigung von Mann und Frau. Der vorliegende Bericht korreliert den WHI 2009 mit dem Global Gender Gap Index von 2008, der sich aus vier Subindizes zusammensetzt: Wirtschaftliche Teilhabe, Bildung, Politische Teilhabe und Gesundheit. Im Ergebnis zeigt sich, dass dort, wo der Hunger groß ist, die Alphabetisierungsrate unter Frauen niedrig ist und Frauen im Vergleich zu Männern einen schlechten Zugang zu Bildung haben. Daneben sind hohe Hungerquoten auch mit ungleichen Bedingungen in Bezug auf Gesundheit assoziiert. Mehr Geschlechtergerechtigkeit in einigen Bereichen, insbesondere bei Bildung und Gesundheit, ist daher ein Schlüssel, um den Hunger zu besiegen ; PR ; IFPRI2; GRP24; Enhanced food and diet quality ; FCND; COM; DGO

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) baseline survey results, summarizing both findings from the WEAI survey and the relationships between the WEAI and various outcomes of interest to the US Government's Feed the Future initiative. These poverty, health, and nutrition outcomes include both factors that might affect empowerment and outcomes that might result from empowerment. The analysis includes thirteen countries from five regions and compares their baseline survey scores. WEAI scores range from a high of 0.98 in Cambodia to a low of 0.66 in Bangladesh. ; Non-PR ; IFPRI1; CRP2; Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index ; PHND; PIM; EPTD ; CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM)