Suchergebnisse

Georges Sorel was of course a critic of "citizenship" in the sense current then as now. But behind his ideal picture of industrial organization there lay a conception of citizenship which derived from an older tradition. This conception in turn modified the themes which Sorel drew from a second tradition, that of thought about "industry." The result was a vision of industrial organization which displaced civil association by taking some of its typical features for itself. What is represented by notions such as the "myth of the general strike" is not, as some have held, a romantic reaction against modern organization but, on the contrary, a thoroughly modern doctrine of organization as the "sublimation" of civil life which continues to pose problems of relevance today.

GEORGE SOREL WAS A CRITIC OF "CITIZENSHIP" IN THE SENSE CURRENT THEN AS NOW. BEHIND HIS IDEAL PICTURE OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION LAY A CONCEPTION OF CITIZENSHIP WHICH DERIVED FROM AN OLDER TRADITION. HE ACHIEVED A VISION OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION WHICH DISPLACED CIVIL ASSOCIATION BY TAKING SOME OF ITS TYPICAL FEATURES FOR ITSELF.

THE AUTHOR EXAMINES THE QUESTION OF CONTROL OF HALLUCINOGENIC DRUGS, THE PROBLEMS POSED BY THEIR USE IN AN INCREASINGLY PERMISSIVE SOCIETY, AND THE POSITIONS AND ARGUMENTS OFFERED BY LIBERTARIANIST LOGIC. HE DISCUSSES THE LEGAL QUESTION OF 3RD-PARTY EFFECTS, THE FAMILY AND THE WELFARE STATE, AND THE WASTE INVOLVED: CAPITAL AND HUMAN RESOURCES; BUREAUCRATIC AND LEGAL EFFORTS; AND CRIME.

Argues that a continued embargo may have forced the Soviet Union to increase production of food rather that munitions.