Der preisgekrönte Autor analysiert die Auswirkungen der Corona-Pandemie auf das (Zusammen-)Leben der Menschen in den europäischen Staaten und Gesellschaften (Autoritarismus, Nationalismus, Deglobalisierung) und prognostiziert in "sieben Paradoxa" die zukünftige Entwicklung der Europäischen Union. (ekz)
Une étude du European Council on Foreign Relations conduite dans quatorze pays d'Europe montre qu'en dépit de divisions, il n'existe pas de polarisation de l'électorat en tribus irréconciliables ; que la question de l'émigration est aussi importante que celle de l'immigration ; que le sentiment européen est important malgré une volonté de renverser le statu quo .
Rupnik, Jacques: In search of a new model. - S. 105-112 Krastev, Ivan: Deepening dissatisfaction. - S. 113-119 Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina: The other transition. - S. 120-127 Tismaneanu, Vladimir: Citizenship restored. - S. 128-135 Nodia, Ghia: Freedom and the state. - S. 136-143 Fairbanks, Charles H. (jr.): Georgia's Soviet legacy. - S. 144-151 Shevtsova, Lilia: What's the matter with Russia? - S. 152-159
Simić, P.: Do the Balkan exist : visions of the future of Southeastern Europe. - S. 13-30 Ilić, G.: The European Union and its southeast European neighbors, first part and secon part. - S. 31-136 Isaković, Z.: NATO and South-Eastern Europe : the powerlessness of the powerful and the power of weak in ethnic conflicts. - S. 137-158 Krastev, I.: De-Balkanizing the Balkans. - S. 159-172 Stanchev, K.: The Balkans in 2010 : economic scenarios. - S. 173-195
As is often the case, personal changes eventually manifested themselves at the macro level as well, for example, in international relations. The United States and the USSR, which had been trading recriminations in the ideological domain for decades, did not reconcile with the fall of communism in our country. Taken aback by the unexpected collapse of the Soviet Union, the two sides spent a couple of years in a state of indifferent equilibrium, but then reverted to their old ways with renewed vigor.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A.: EU accession is no "end of history". - S. 8-16 Rupnik, J.: From democracy fatigue to populist backlash. - S. 17-25 Jasiewicz, K.: The political-party landscape. - S. 27-33 Tismaneanu, V.: Leninist legacies, pluralist dilemmas. - S. 34-39 Greskovits, B.: Economic woes and political disaffection. - S. 40-46 Bútora, M.: Nightmares from the past, dreams of the future. - S. 47-55 Krastev, I.: The strange death of the liberal consensus. - S. 56-63
Europe seems beset by the prospect of crisis. And yet its institutions continue to function. The continent remains a zone of economic privilege, a status that exacts other kinds of cost, humanitarian and social. Established political processes continue to operate as usual. At the same time, we witness the rise of protest reactionary and progressive. Our speakers asked what ideals ought to claim the commitment of Europeans today, in a situation combining cynicism and struggle, threat and stability. Programme Thursday, 27 March 18:30 Introduction: What Europe? Ideals to Fight for Today Roger Berkowitz (Hannah Arendt Center, Bard College New York) 18:45 Keynote Introduction Dr. Gabriele Freitag, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Osteuropakunde 19:00: Opening Keynote: Ukraine: Soviet Past, European Future? Timothy Snyder (Yale University) Friday, 28 March 10:30-12:00 Opening Panel Where is democracy to be found in Europe today? Speakers: Ivan Krastev (Centre for Liberal Strategies) Eirini Avramopoulou (ICI Berlin) Ulrike Winkelmann (taz Berlin) 14:00-16:00 Panel Is there a European Idea? Speakers: Patrick Bahners (F.A.Z.) Roger Berkowitz (Hannah Arendt Center, Bard College New York) Walter Russell Mead (Bard College New York) 16:30-18:00 Panel What use are Europe's heritages in looking to the future? Speakers: Peter Baehr (Lingnan University, Hong Kong) Agata Lisiak (Bard College Berlin) Rob Riemen (Nexus Institute, the Netherlands) 18:15 Closing Remarks Catherine Toal (Bard College Berlin) ; What Europe?: Ideals to Fight for Today , conference, ICI Berlin, 27–28 March 2014