RésuméLa présente recherche propose et vérifie la première modélisation, par analyse d'équations structurales, de différents antécédents distaux et proximaux sur les trois bases de l'engagement organisationnel (EO) mesurées à l'aide d'un instrument de mesure élaboré par Becker (1992): l'internalisation, l'identification et l'échange. Pour y parvenir, une démarche empirique a été effectuée dans 22 établissements de santé québécois en respectant une méthode d'échantillonnage stratifiée proportionnelle (n = 3037). Les résultats indiquent que le modèle le plus adéquat parmi ceux testés confirme la structure proposée où l'influence des deux variables distales (Implication au travail et Lieu de contrǒle) sur les trois composantes de l'EO s'exerce en totalité par l'entremise des variables proximales (Perception de son rǒle au travail, Perception du leadership de son supérieur immédiat, Implication à l'emploi et Perception des caractéristiques de l'organisation). Ces deux dernières variables proximales se sont avérées celles prédisant la plus forte proportion de variance des trois bases de l'EO, particulièrement en ce qui concerne l'internalisation et l'identification. En plus de ces patrons de relations assez similaires, ces deux bases sont fortement intercorrélées, ce qui compromet empiriquement leur distinction. Quant à la troisième base de l'EO, l'échange, elle se distingue nettement des deux autres aussi bien en termes d'intercorrélations qu'en termes de relations avec les antécédents du modèle. Finalement, l'effet modérateur de la catégorie occupationnelle s'est avéré non significatif puisque le modèle retenu s'applique aussi bien pour les personnels clinique et infirmier que pour le personnel non clinique. L'ensemble de ces résultats fait l'objet d'une discussion relative à certaines avenues de recherche prometteuses et aux implications de gestion visant à augmenter le degré d'EO dans les organisations contemporaines soucieuses de mettre à contribution le potentiel de leurs ressources humaines.AbstractThe following research puts forward and confirms the first model, tested through structural equation modeling, of distal and proximal antecedents of the three organisational commitment (OC) bases that were assessed with a scale developed by Becker (1992): internalization, identification, and compliance. An empirical study was con‐ducted throughout 22 health establishments within the province of Québec using a proportional stratified sampling method. The results, obtained from a usable sample of 3037 subjects from all occupational categories, allowed for the identification of the most appropriate model among those tested. This model suggests a structure where the influence of the two distal variables (Work involvement and Locus of control) on the three dimensions of OC is totally exerted by the intervention of proximal variables (Perceived rǒle states, Perceived supervisor's leadership, Job involvement, Perceived organizational characteristics). These two latter proximal variables predicted the most variance of the three OC bases, especially with respect to internalization and identification. In addition to those similar patterns of relationship, these two bases highly correlate with one another thereby compromising their empirical distinction. Regarding the third OC base (compliance), it can be distinguished from the other two in terms of intercor‐relaǐions as well as in terms of its relationship with the model's antecedents. Finally, the moderating effect of occupational category was non significant since the model can be applied as well to clinical and nursing personnel as to non clinical personnel. The evidence is discussed with regards to promising future research and implications for management aiming at increasing the OC's level within contemporary organization concerned with the contribution of their human resources' potential.Dans sa synthèse, Meyer (1997) souligne la nécessité d'améliorer notre compréhension du processus d'engagement organisationnel (EO). II met 1'accent sur le besoin d'étudier ce processus en reconnaissant que l'EO peut prendre différentes formes et que chacune peut se développer de différentes manières. Depuis la synthèse de Griffin et Bateman (1986), la recherche consacrée à l'EO a permis le développement de nouvelles conceptualisations et de nouvelles mesures de l'EO. Les chercheurs ont également amélioré leurs techniques d'analyse des données relatives au développement et aux conséquences de l'EO.Malgré ces progrès, il n'en reste pas moins que diverses méta‐analyses ont fait ressortir les limites des recherches consacrées à l'EO (Aven, Parker, & McEvoy, 1993; Cohen & Lowenberg, 1990; Mathieu & Zajac, 1990; Randall, 1990; Wallace, 1993). En ce qui concerne les antécédents de l'EO, ces méta‐analyses suggèrent que l'engagement s'avère plus fortement relié aux caractéristiques de l'emploi et de l'environnement de travail, qu'aux caractéristiques personnelles. Cependant, ces méta‐analyses indiquent également que les résultats des recherches analysées doivent ětre interprétés avec cir‐conspection considérant leurs limites conceptuelles et méthodologiques. À cet égard, il ressort des problèmes de clarté et de consensus concernant la conceptualisation et la mesure de l'EO. On relève également la nature athéorique de la recherche abordant les antécédents de l'EO, incluant la faible considération des mécanismes de médiation. Les méta‐analyses font aussi ressortir les carences des méthodes d'analyse de données traditionnelles telles que la régression multiple. Finalement, les recherches consacrées aussi bien aux antécédents qu'aux conséquences de l'EO se préoccupent rarement des effets modérateurs de certaines variables.La présente étude vise à pallier certaines de ces limites. En effet, elle a pour objectif d'améliorer notre compréhension du processus d'EO en ayant recours à une modélisation basée sur l'analyse d'équations structurales plutotǒue sur l'analyse de cheminement (Mathieu, 1988, 1991; Mathieu & Hamel, 1989) ou sur les analyses correlationnelles classiques (Cohen, 1992; Mathieu & Zajac, 1990; Randall, 1990). Dans la foulée de quelques rares études antérieures, nous examinerons l'ordonnancement causal de certaines variables pouvant avoir une influence sur le développement de l'EO (DeCotiis & Summers, 1987; Mathieu, 1988, 1991; Mathieu & Hamel, 1989). Comme le proposent ces auteurs, l'or‐donnnancement des variables s'effectuera sur la base de la théorie de Lewin (1943, 1951) qui suggère que les réactions des employés à leur environnement de travail, en Poccurrence l'EO, devraient ětre principalement fonction de leur perceptions d'éléments proximaux comme les expériences au travail. Selon cette théorie, les caractéristiques personnelles sont considérées comme des prédicteurs distaux susceptibles d'exercer une influence indirecte sur l'EO, à travers les variables proximales.La présente recherche vise également à apporter une contribution conceptuelle à la compréhension de l'EO en ayant recours à la mesure multidimensionnelle proposée par Becker (1992) plutǒt qu'à celle proposée par Meyer et Allen (1991). L'étude permettra done de vérifier si les antécédents proximaux et distaux auront, conformément aux postulats théoriques, une influence différente sur les trois bases de l'EO proposées par O'Reilly et ses collègues (Caldwell, Chatman, & O'Reilly, 1990; O'Reilly & Chatman, 1986).
Objective To identify the genetic determinants of fracture risk and assess the role of 15 clinical risk factors on osteoporotic fracture risk. DESIGN Meta-analysis of genome wide association studies (GWAS) and a two-sample mendelian randomisation approach. Setting 25 cohorts from Europe, United States, east Asia, and Australia with genome wide genotyping and fracture data. Participants A discovery set of 37 857 fracture cases and 227 116 controls; with replication in up to 147 200 fracture cases and 150 085 controls. Fracture cases were defined as individuals (>18 years old) who had fractures at any skeletal site confirmed by medical, radiological, or questionnaire reports. Instrumental variable analyses were performed to estimate effects of 15 selected clinical risk factors for fracture in a twosample mendelian randomisation framework, using the largest previously published GWAS meta-analysis of each risk factor. Results Of 15 fracture associated loci identified, all were also associated with bone mineral density and mapped to genes clustering in pathways known to be critical to bone biology (eg, SOST, WNT16, and ESR1) or novel pathways (FAM210A, GRB10, and ETS2). Mendelian randomisation analyses showed a clear effect of bone mineral density on fracture risk. One standard deviation decrease in genetically determined bone mineral density of the femoral neck was associated with a 55% increase in fracture risk (odds ratio 1.55 (95% confidence interval 1.48 to 1.63; P=1.5×10?68). Hand grip strength was inversely associated with fracture risk, but this result was not significant after multiple testing correction. The remaining clinical risk factors (including vitamin D levels) showed no evidence for an effect on fracture. Con clusions This large scale GWAS meta-analysis for fracture identified 15 genetic determinants of fracture, all of which also influenced bone mineral density. Among the clinical risk factors for fracture assessed, only bone mineral density showed a major causal effect on fracture. Genetic predisposition to lower levels of vitamin D and estimated calcium intake from dairy sources were not associated with fracture risk. ; Funding: This research and the Genetic Factors for Osteoporosis (GEFOS) consortium have been funded by the European Commission (HEALTH-F2-2008-201865-GEFOS). AGES: NIH contract N01- AG-12100 and NIA Intramural Research Program, Hjartavernd (the Icelandic Heart Association), and Althingi (the Icelandic Parliament). Icelandic Heart Association. Anglo-Australasian Osteoporosis Genetics Consortium (AOGC): National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) (grant reference 511132). Australian Cancer Research Foundation and Rebecca Cooper Foundation (Australia). National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Career Development Award (569807). Medical Research Council New Investigator Award (MRC G0800582). Health Research Council of New Zealand. Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and Roche. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, MBF Living Well foundation, the Ernst Heine Family Foundation and from untied educational grants from Amgen, Eli Lilly International, GE-Lunar, Merck Australia, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis Australia and Servier. Medical Research Council UK and Arthritis Research UK. The Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and the Geelong Region Medical Research Foundation, and the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (project grant 628582). Action Research UK. DME is supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT130101709). This work was supported by a Medical Research Council programme grant (MC_UU_12013/4). B-Vitamins for the PRevention Of Osteoporotic Fractures (BPROOF) study: supported and funded so far by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, grant 6130.0031), The Hague; unrestricted grant from NZO (Dutch Dairy Association), Zoetermeer; Orthica, Almere; Netherlands Consortium Healthy Ageing (NCHA) Leiden/Rotterdam; Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation (project KB-15-004-003), The Hague; Wageningen University, Wageningen; VUmc, Amsterdam; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam. Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS): National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) contracts HHSN268201200036C, HHSN268200800007C, N01HC55222, N01HC85079, N01HC85080, N01HC85081, N01HC85082, N01HC85083, N01HC85086; and NHLBI grants U01HL080295, R01HL087652, R01HL105756, R01HL103612, R01HL120393, and R01HL130114 with additional contribution from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS). Additional support was provided through R01AG023629 from the National Institute on Ageing (NIA). Genotyping supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, CTSI grant UL1TR000124, and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease Diabetes Research Center (DRC) grant DK063491 to the Southern California Diabetes Endocrinology Research Center. deCODE Genetics. EPIC-Norfolk: Medical Research Council G9321536 and G9800062, MAFF AN0523, EU FP5 (QLK6-CT-2002-02629), Food Standards Agency N05046, GEFOS EU FP7 Integrated Project Grant Reference: 201865, The UK's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre Grant to Cambridge contributed to the costs of genotyping. Estonian Genome Center University of Tartu (EGCUT): This study was supported by EU H2020 grants 692145, 676550, 654248, Estonian Research Council Grant IUT20-60, NIASC and EIT—Health and EU through the European Regional Development Fund (project No 2014-2020.4.01.15-0012 GENTRANSMED). Erasmus Rucphen Family Study (ERF): Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), Erasmus University Medical Centre, the Centre for Medical Systems Biology (CMSB1 and CMSB2) of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI). Framingham Osteoporosis Study (FOS): National Institute for Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and National Institute on Ageing (R01 AR41398; DPK and R01 AR 050066; DK National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study (N01-HC-25195) and its contract with Affymetrix for genotyping services (N02-HL-6-4278). The Gothenburg Osteoporosis and Obesity Determinan Study (GOOD): Swedish Research Council (K2010-54X-09894-19-3, 2006-3832 and K2010-52X-20229-05-3), Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, ALF/LUA research grant in Gothenburg, Lundberg Foundation, Torsten and Ragnar Söderberg's Foundation, Västra Götaland Foundation, Göteborg Medical Society, Novo Nordisk Foundation, and European Commission grant HEALTH-F2-2008- 201865-GEFOS. Health Aging and Body Composition Study (HealthABC): the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Health (NIH), National Institute on Ageing. US National Institute of Ageing (NIA) contracts N01AG62101, N01AG62103, and N01AG62106. NIA grant 1R01AG032098. The Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR). National Institutes of Health contract number HHSN268200782096C. Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study (HKOS): Hong Kong Research Grant Council (HKU 768610M); Bone Health Fund of HKU Foundation; KC Wong Education Foundation; Small Project Funding (201007176237); Matching Grant, Committee on research and conference (CRCG) Grant and Osteoporosis and Endocrine Research Fund; and the Genomics Strategic Research Theme of the University of Hong Kong. The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study is supported by National Institutes of Health funding. The following institutes provide support: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), National Institute on Ageing (NIA), National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), and National Institute of Health (NIH) Roadmap for Medical Research under the following grant numbers: U01 AR45580, U01 AR45614, U01 AR45632, U01 AR45647, U01 AR45654, U01 AR45583, U01 AG18197, U01-AG027810, and UL1 RR024140. Prospective study of pravastatin in the elderly at risk (PROSPER): European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No HEALTH-F2-2009-223004 PHASE. Rotterdam study I, Rotterdam study II, Rotterdam study III: Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research (NWO) Investments (No 175.010.2005.011, 911-03-012); Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (014-93-015; RIDE2); Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing (050-060-810); German Bundesministerium fuer Forschung und Technology under grants #01 AK 803 A-H and # 01 IG 07015 G. the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMw VIDI 016.136.367 (funding FR, CM-G, KT). Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF): supported by National Institutes of Health funding. The National Institute on Ageing (NIA) and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) provides support under the following grant numbers: R01 AG005407, R01 AR35582, R01 AR35583, R01 AR35584, R01 AG005394, R01 AG027574, R01 AG027576, and R01 AG026720. TwinsUK1, TwinsUK2: NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (grant to Guys' and St Thomas' Hospitals and King's College London); Chronic Disease Research Foundation; Wellcome Trust; Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Fonds de la Recherche en Santé Québec, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, and Ministère du Développement économique, de l'Innovation et de l'Exportation du Quebec. UK Biobank: This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (application No 12703). Access to the UK Biobank study data was funded by a University of Queensland Early Career Researcher Grant (2014002959). Access to the UK Biobank study data was funded by University of Queensland Early Career Researcher Grant (2014002959) and University of Western Australia-University of Queensland Bilateral Research Collaboration Award (2014001711). NMW is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (APP1104818). Women's Genome Health Study (WGHS): HL 043851 and HL69757 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and CA 047988 from the National Cancer Institute, the Donald W Reynolds Foundation, and the Fondation Leducq Amgen. Women's Health Initiative (WHI) program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, US. Department of Health and Human Services through contracts N01WH22110, 24152, 32100-2, 32105-6, 32108-9, 32111-13, 32115, 32118-32119, 32122, 42107-26, 42129-32, and 44221. Young Finns study (YFS): has been financially supported by the Academy of Finland: grants 286284 (TL), 134309 (Eye), 126925, 121584, 124282, 129378 (Salve), 117787 (Gendi), and 41071 (Skidi); the Social Insurance Institution of Finland; Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Tampere, Turku and Kuopio University Hospitals (grant X51001); Juho Vainio Foundation; Paavo Nurmi Foundation; Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research; Finnish Cultural Foundation; Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation; Emil Aaltonen Foundation; Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation; Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation; and Diabetes Research Foundation of Finnish Diabetes Association; and EU Horizon 2020 (grant 755320 for TAXINOMISIS). Barcelona cohort osteoporosis (BARCOS): Red de Envejecimiento y fragilidad RETICEF, CIBERER, Instituto Carlos III. Fondos FEDER. Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS PI13/00116). Spanish MINECO (SAF2014-56562-R), Catalan Government (2014SGR932). Austrios-A, Austrios-B: was supported by BioPersMed (COMET K project 825329), and the Competence Center CBmed (COMET K1 centre 844609), funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economics and Labour/ the Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth (BMWA/BMWFJ) and the Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG). Cantabria-Camargo study (Cabrio-C), Cantabria osteoporosis case-control study (Cabrio-CC): Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias Grants PI 06/34,PI09/539, PI12/615 and PI15/521 (that could be cofunded by European Union-FEDER funds). Calcium Intake Fracture Outcome Study (CAIFOS): Healthway Health Promotion Foundation of Western Australia, Australasian Menopause Society and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant (254627, 303169 and 572604). Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) (grant No MOP111103). JBR and JAM are funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds du Recherche Québec Santé, and Jewish General Hospital. Edinburgh Osteoporosis Study (EDOS): was supported by a grant from Arthritis Research UK (grant number 15389). European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS): EU Biomed 1 (BMHICT920182, CIPDCT925012, ERBC1PDCT 940229, ERBC1PDCT930105), Medical Research Council G9321536 and G9800062, Wellcome Trust Collaborative Research Initiative 1995, MAFF AN0523,EU FP5 (QLK6-CT-2002-02629), Food Standards Agency N05046, GEFOS EU FP7 Integrated Project Grant Reference: 201865. The UK's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre Grant to Cambridge contributed to the costs of genotyping. Geelong Osteoporosis Study (GEOS): Canadian Institutes for health research operating grant funding reference #86748. Genetic analysis of osteoporosis in Greece (GROS): University of Athens, Greece (Kapodistrias 2009). Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS): supported by Medical Research Council UK; Arthritis Research UK; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Musculoskeletal BRU Oxford; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nutrition BRC Southampton. Hong Kong: The projects have been supported by The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust, VC discretionary fund of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, and Research Grants Council Earmarked Grant CUHK4101/02M. Korean osteoporosis study in Asan Medical Center (KorAMC): a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (project No HI14C2258); a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (project No HI15C0377). Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA): largely supported by a grant from the Netherlands Ministry of Health Welfare and Sports, Directorate of Long term Care. MINOS study was supported by a grant from the Merck-Sharp-Dohme Chibret company. Malta osteoporotic fracture study (MOFS): financial support was received from the European Union Strategic Educational Pathways Scholarhip scheme (STEPS). The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Sweden: financial support was received from the Swedish Research Council (K2010- 54X-09894-19-3, 2006-3832), Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, ALF/LUA research grant in Gothenburg, Lundberg Foundation, Torsten and Ragnar Söderberg's Foundation, Västra Götaland Foundation, Göteborg Medical Society, Novo Nordisk foundation, and European Commission grant HEALTH-F2-2008- 201865-GEFOS. Odense androgen study (OAS): World Anti-Doping Agency, Danish Ministry of Culture, Institute of Clinical Research of the University of Southern Denmark. Prevalence of osteoporosis in Slovenia (Slo-preval): was created as part of projects financially supported by the Slovenian research agency: P3-298 Geni, Hormoni in osebnostne spremembe pri hormonskih motnjah; Z1-3238: Genski in okoljski dejavniki tveganja za razvoj motnje pri remodellaciji kosti; J2-3314 Genetski faktorji in hormoni pri presnovnih boleznih; and J3-2330 Genetski dejavniki pri osteoporozi. TWINGENE: supported in part by the Ragnar Söderberg Foundation (E9/11); the National Science Foundation (EArly Concept Grants for Exploratory Research: "Workshop for the Formation of a Social Science Genetic Association Consortium," SES-1064089) as supplemented by the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) Office of Behavioural and Social Sciences Research; and the National Institute on Ageing/NIH through Grants P01-AG005842, P01-AG005842-20S2, P30-AG012810, and T32-AG000186-23 to the National Bureau of Economic Research. The Swedish Twin Registry is supported by the Swedish Department of Higher Education, European Commission European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology (ENGAGE: 7th Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013)/Grant agreement HEALTH-F4-2007-201413; and GenomEUtwin: 5th Framework program "Quality of Life and Management of the Living Resources" Grant QLG2-CT-2002-01254); NIH (DK U01-066134); Swedish Research Council (M-2005-1112 and 2009-2298); Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (ICA08-0047); Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation; and Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research. The Umeå Fracture and Osteoporosis Study (UFO) is supported by the Swedish Research Council (K20006- 72X-20155013), Swedish Sports Research Council (87/06), Swedish Society of Medicine, Kempe-Foundation (JCK-1021), and by grants from the Medical Faculty of Umeå University (ALFVLL:968:22-2005, ALFVL:-937-2006, ALFVLL:223:11-2007, ALFVLL:78151-2009) and county council of Västerbotten (SpjutspetsanslagVLL:159:33-2007). GRW and JHDB were funded by the Wellcome Trust (Strategic Award grant No 101123; Joint Investigator Award No 110141; project grant No 094134). DPK was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Arthritis Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases R01 AR041398. The funding agencies had no role in the study design, analysis, or interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
La surreprésentation des hommes autochtones au sein des services correctionnels canadiens a pris une envergure alarmante et cette situation tend à se dégrader au fil du temps. En vue de mieux répondre aux besoins des détenus et de diminuer leur croissante surreprésentation, des pavillons de ressourcement ont été créés, soit des établissements où les personnes autochtones peuvent être transférées afin de poursuivre une démarche de guérison. Si nombre d'études ont été menées, d'une part, pour comprendre la guérison autochtone et, d'autre part, pour explorer les causes de la surreprésentation carcérale ou encore l'efficacité des programmes correctionnels axés sur la spiritualité, très peu de recherches s'attardent à l'expérience des principaux acteurs engagés, à savoir les hommes autochtones. De plus, alors que le rétablissement et la réinsertion sociale ont fait l'objet d'une attention soutenue dans les écrits scientifiques et dans les pratiques d'intervention sociale, la guérison autochtone demeure très peu explorée. Cette recherche qualitative vise à mieux comprendre les démarches de guérison d'hommes autochtones ayant séjourné au sein d'un pavillon de ressourcement au Canada (Waseskun, Québec; Stan Daniels et Pê Sâkâstêw, Alberta; Kwìkwèxwelhp, Colombie-Britannique) et étant actuellement en liberté totale. Plus particulièrement, les objectifs visés sont de: 1) dégager le sens que les hommes autochtones donnent à la notion de guérison; 2) comprendre l'expérience des hommes autochtones quant à leur démarche de guérison entamée ou poursuivie au sein d'un pavillon de ressourcement; 3) comprendre comment se poursuit la démarche de guérison des hommes autochtones depuis leur sortie du pavillon (facteurs facilitants et défis rencontrés) et enfin, 4) contraster l'expérience de la guérison vécue par les hommes autochtones à la conception correctionnelle de la guérison. Pour recueillir les données, 14 hommes autochtones ont été rencontrés lors d'entretiens narratifs en profondeur. Au total, 20 entrevues ont été réalisées. Une analyse documentaire a également été entreprise, regroupant 20 écrits qui reflètent la conception correctionnelle de la guérison (recherche financée par le SCC ou par les pavillons de ressourcement; publications entourant les politiques et les pratiques correctionnelles ainsi que la littérature « grise »). Une démarche constructiviste et phénoménologique des récits des hommes autochtones a permis de jeter un éclairage nouveau sur leurs expériences et sur les éléments qui facilitent ou entravent leur guérison, à l'intérieur des institutions correctionnelles comme à l'extérieur, une fois qu'ils sont libérés. Les multiples traumatismes et les blessures intérieures, conjugués au cumul de problèmes familiaux, socio-économiques et structurels, sont évoqués afin de comprendre la complexité et la globalité du contexte dans lequel s'inscrivent leurs démarches de guérison. Les résultats soutiennent que la guérison signifie, pour plusieurs hommes, de marcher sur un chemin vers l'équilibre, de travailler sur soi et de s'éloigner des mauvaises habitudes. Le retour aux valeurs autochtones (respect, partage, courage, humilité, honnêteté, responsabilité) est au cœur de la guérison telle qu'entrevue par les hommes. Les résultats indiquent également que la guérison est une démarche individuelle, mais également relationnelle. Plusieurs répondants affirment que les pavillons de ressourcement ont contribué à transformer leur vision d'eux-mêmes et de leur identité, mais également les rapports qu'ils entretiennent avec les autres. Cela s'explique par l'accès à des programmes axés sur la culture et la spiritualité ainsi qu'une reconnaissance de ces pavillons quant aux manières autochtones d'être, de penser et de comprendre le monde. Toutefois, les résultats indiquent que les éléments culturels et spirituels sont très peu mobilisés lors de la libération conditionnelle, à la sortie des pavillons de ressourcement. Ils révèlent également que la communauté et le maintien d'un réseau social et familial peuvent tantôt être des facteurs de protection, tantôt des facteurs qui entravent le parcours de guérison des hommes. Le manque de services formels destinés aux hommes autochtones est également une problématique soulevée lors des entretiens. Enfin, l'analyse documentaire a permis d'entrevoir que pour le Service correctionnel du Canada (SCC), la guérison repose sur une responsabilisation individuelle liée à des changements observables dans les comportements ainsi qu'au désistement du crime. Elle est conçue comme un moyen défini et mesurable de parvenir à la réinsertion sociale. Les résultats soutiennent que la guérison est souvent évaluée en fonction de données quantitatives liées directement aux comportements délictuels et au niveau de violence, ce qui a pour effet d'occulter les aspects subjectifs et expérientiels de la guérison vécue par les hommes. ; The over-representation of Indigenous men in Canadian correctional systems has grown alarmingly and this situation tends to deteriorate over time. In an effort to better meet the needs of offenders and reduce their growing over-representation, Healing Lodges (HL) have been created, facilities to which Indigenous offenders can be transferred in order to pursue a healing journey. While several studies have been conducted to understand Indigenous healing and, on the other hand, to explore the causes of prison over-representation or the effectiveness of spiritually-based correctional programs, very little research has focused on the experience of the primary actors involved, namely Indigenous men. Moreover, while recovery and reintegration have received sustained attention in the scientific literature and in social intervention practices, Indigenous healing remains largely unexplored. This qualitative research aims to better understand the healing journeys of Indigenous men who have stayed in a Healing Lodge in Canada (Waseskun, Quebec; Stan Daniels and Pê Sâkâstêw, Alberta; Kwìkwèxwelhp, British Columbia) and are currently in full freedom (after the Warrant Expiry Date (WED). More specifically, the objectives of this thesis are to: 1) identify the meanings that Indigenous men give to the notion of healing; 2) understand the experiences of Indigenous men with respect to their healing journey, initiated or pursued in a HL; 3) understand how the healing journey of Indigenous men has continued since leaving the lodge (facilitating factors and challenges encountered); and 4) contrast the Indigenous men's experience of healing with the correctional conception of healing. To collect the data, 14 Indigenous men were interviewed in in-depth narrative interviews. A total of 20 interviews were conducted. A documentary analysis was also completed, bringing together 20 pieces of literature that reflect the correctional conception of healing (research funded by CSC or by Healing Lodges; publications regarding correctional policies and practices as well as grey literature). A constructivist and phenomenological approach to Indigenous men's narratives has shed new light on their experiences and on the elements that facilitate or impede their healing journeys, both inside and outside correctional institutions, once they are released. The multiple traumas and inner wounds, combined with the accumulation of family, socio-economic and structural problems, are evoked in order to understand the complexity and the globality of the context in which the healing efforts of Indigenous men take place. The results show that for many men, healing means: walking a path towards balance, working on one self and stepping away from bad habits. The return to Indigenous values (respect, sharing, courage, humility, honesty, responsibility) is at the heart of healing as seen by men. The results also indicate that healing is not only an individual journey but also a relational one. Several respondents revealed that Healing Lodges have contributed to transforming their vision of themselves and their identity, but also the relationships they have with others. This is due to the access to culturally and spiritually oriented programs as well as the recognition of Indigenous ways of being, thinking and understanding the world that the Lodges provide. However, the results show that cultural and spiritual elements are very little mobilized during parole (when men have left HL). They also reveal that community and the maintenance of a social and family network can sometimes be protective factors and sometimes factors that hinder the men's healing. The lack of formal services for Indigenous men is also an issue raised in the interviews. Finally, the documentary analysis revealed that for the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC), healing is seen as an individual empowerment linked to observable changes in behavior as well as desistance from crime. It is conceived as a defined and measurable means to achieve social reintegration. The results show that healing is often assessed based on quantitative data directly related to offending behavior and the violence level, thereby obscuring both subjective and experiential aspects of men's healing.
Ce sont les jeunes qui sont les premiers concernés par le défi environnemental du réchauffement climatique, car ce sont surtout eux qui auront à vivre les changements sociaux que ce phénomène entraînera inévitablement. Nous avons donc choisi, dans le cadre de notre thèse, de mener une enquête auprès de certaines catégories d'entre eux, dans le but de découvrir, considérant en particulier leurs valeurs, quels changements sociaux ayant des effets sur le mode de vie, et plus généralement quelles contraintes sociales, ils sont disposés à accepter, et à quelles conditions. Pour cela, nous nous sommes employés à déterminer les valeurs auxquelles les jeunes sont le plus attachés, à comprendre comment ils conçoivent le problème des changements climatiques et ses effets à long terme sur la société, à bien saisir la vision qu'ils ont de la société du futur, c'est-à-dire quelles sont les caractéristiques de la société dans laquelle ils souhaitent vivre, et à les interroger sur les conditions requises pour que ce souhait se réalise. Cette enquête a été faite au moyen d'entrevues semi-dirigées d'étudiants et d'étudiantes de niveau universitaire et collégial (technique), mais non de niveau secondaire (professionnel), tel que prévu au départ, à cause des mesures mises en place par le gouvernement en mars 2020 pour faire face à la pandémie de Covid-19. Nous avons toutefois tenté de prendre avantage de cette situation en interrogeant de nouveau, six mois après le début de la pandémie, la moitié des répondants afin de déterminer dans quelle mesure la crise de la Covid-19 avait influencé leur vision de la société future idéale. Nous avons interrogé 20 étudiants de l'Université Laval à l'automne 2019, 14 du Cégep Limoilou à l'hiver 2020, et 17 d'entre eux une seconde fois à l'automne 2020. Les résultats de notre enquête montrent que les répondants peuvent être classés selon six types distincts, soit ceux et celles qui souhaitent: I - des changements radicaux (principalement économiques) et une réduction des inégalités; II - des changements radicaux (principalement économiques) et une réduction des inégalités, mais qui n'ont pas confiance aux autres et à l'éducation; III - des changements radicaux (principalement économiques), mais qui n'ont pas confiance aux autres et à l'éducation; IV - des changements modérés (principalement économiques); V - des changements modérés (principalement économiques), mais qui n'ont pas confiance aux autres et à l'éducation; VI - peu de changements et qui font confiance à la technologie pour régler les problèmes. À l'exception de ceux de type VI (dans l'ensemble, malgré certaines réserves concernant les risques pour les humains, nos répondants sont plutôt d'avis que les progrès technologiques sont intéressants, mais qu'ils ne représentent pas la solution ultime aux défis environnementaux), il y a chez nos répondants un rejet assez généralisé de la société de consommation, même si ce rejet ne se reflète que bien partiellement dans leurs pratiques actuelles et correspond plutôt à leur vision de la société future idéale. Cette vision, il faut le souligner, découle clairement de leurs valeurs acquises au cours de leur socialisation dans un environnement caractéristique de la seconde modernité. Ces résultats confirment, comme nous en avions fait l'hypothèse, que beaucoup de jeunes veulent vivre dans une société dont la priorité est le bien-être des citoyens plutôt que la richesse financière personnelle et que la plupart sont prêts à des changements majeurs de leurs habitudes de vie. Toutefois, pour plusieurs, contrairement à ce que de nombreux penseurs affirment, et contrairement aussi à une de nos hypothèses, le lien entre la protection de l'environnement et la réduction des inégalités sociales n'est pas évident. D'un point de vue théorique, nous croyons que les quatre types de réflexivité développés par Archer (la réflexivité communicative, la réflexivité autonome, la méta-réflexivité, et la réflexivité fragmentée) sont applicables aux différentes visions qu'ont nos répondants de la société idéale, mais qu'il est nécessaire d'y introduire un nouveau paramètre, soit la confiance ou la non-confiance. Ceux et celles qui n'ont pas confiance aux autres et à l'éducation souhaitent un contrôle social beaucoup plus élevé dans la société future idéale. Par ailleurs, les résultats des nouvelles entrevues à l'automne 2020 indiquent que les valeurs sont plutôt stables et qu'elles peuvent être associées à des facteurs de changement social. ; Young people will the first to be affected by the environmental challenge of global warming, because it is above all they who will have to live the social changes that this phenomenon will inevitably bring about. We have therefore chosen, within the framework of our thesis, to conduct a survey of certain categories of them, with the aim of discovering, particularly considering their values, which social changes having effects on the way of life, and more generally what social constraints they are willing to accept, and under what conditions. To do this, we have endeavored to determine the values to which young people are most attached, to understand how they perceive the problem of climate change and its long-term effects on society, to fully grasp the vision they have of the society of the future, i.e. what are the characteristics of the society in which they wish to live, and to question them on the conditions required for this wish to be realized. This survey was carried out by means of semi-structured interviews of students at the university and technical college level, but not at the professional secondary level as initially planned, because of the measures imposed by the Québec government in March 2020 to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic. However, we tried to take advantage of this situation by interviewing again, six months after the start of the pandemic, half of the respondents, in order to determine to what extent the Covid-19 crisis had influenced their vision of the ideal future society. We interviewed 20 students from Laval University in the fall of 2019, 14 from Cégep Limoilou in the winter of 2020, and 17 of them a second time in the fall of 2020. The results of our survey show that the respondents can be classified into six distinct types, namely those who wish: I - radical changes (mainly economic) and a reduction in inequalities; II - radical changes (mainly economic) and a reduction in inequalities, but who do not trust others and education; III - radical changes (mainly economic), but who do not trust others and education; IV - moderate changes (mainly economic); V - moderate changes (mainly economic), but who do not trust others and education; VI - few changes and who trust technology to fix the problems. With the exception of those of type VI (overall, despite some reservations about the risks to humans, our respondents tend to believe that technological advances are interesting, but that they do not represent the ultimate solution to the environmental challenges), our respondents generally reject the consumer society, even if this rejection is only partially reflected in their current practices and rather corresponds to their vision of the ideal future society. This vision, it should be emphasized, clearly stems from their values acquired during their socialization in an environment that is characteristic of the second (or late) modernity. These results confirm, as we hypothesized, that many young people want to live in a society whose priority is the well-being of citizens rather than personal financial wealth and that most are ready for major changes in their way of life. However, for many, contrary to what many thinkers assert, and also contrary to one of our hypotheses, the link between environmental protection and the reduction of social inequalities is not obvious. From a theoretical point of view, we believe that the four types of reflexivity developed by Archer (communicative reflexivity, autonomous reflexivity, meta-reflexivity, and fragmented reflexivity) are applicable to the different views our respondents have of the ideal future society, but it is necessary to introduce a new parameter, trust or non-trust. Those who do not trust others and education desire much greater social control in the ideal future society. In addition, the results of the new interviews in the fall of 2020 indicate that values are rather stable and that they may be associated with factors of social change.
This global study, which has been coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric Watch (WMO/GAW) programme, aims to understand the behaviour of key air pollutant species during the COVID-19 pandemic period of exceptionally low emissions across the globe. We investigated the effects of the differences in both emissions and regional and local meteorology in 2020 compared with the period 2015–2019. By adopting a globally consistent approach, this comprehensive observational analysis focuses on changes in air quality in and around cities across the globe for the following air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, PMC (coarse fraction of PM), NO2, SO2, NOx, CO, O3 and the total gaseous oxidant (OX = NO2 + O3) during the pre-lockdown, partial lockdown, full lockdown and two relaxation periods spanning from January to September 2020. The analysis is based on in situ ground-based air quality observations at over 540 traffic, background and rural stations, from 63 cities and covering 25 countries over seven geographical regions of the world. Anomalies in the air pollutant concentrations (increases or decreases during 2020 periods compared to equivalent 2015–2019 periods) were calculated and the possible effects of meteorological conditions were analysed by computing anomalies from ERA5 reanalyses and local observations for these periods. We observed a positive correlation between the reductions in NO2 and NOx concentrations and peoples' mobility for most cities. A correlation between PMC and mobility changes was also seen for some Asian and South American cities. A clear signal was not observed for other pollutants, suggesting that sources besides vehicular emissions also substantially contributed to the change in air quality. As a global and regional overview of the changes in ambient concentrations of key air quality species, we observed decreases of up to about 70% in mean NO2 and between 30% and 40% in mean PM2.5 concentrations over 2020 full lockdown compared to the same period in 2015–2019. However, PM2.5 exhibited complex signals, even within the same region, with increases in some Spanish cities, attributed mainly to the long-range transport of African dust and/or biomass burning (corroborated with the analysis of NO2/CO ratio). Some Chinese cities showed similar increases in PM2.5 during the lockdown periods, but in this case, it was likely due to secondary PM formation. Changes in O3 concentrations were highly heterogeneous, with no overall change or small increases (as in the case of Europe), and positive anomalies of 25% and 30% in East Asia and South America, respectively, with Colombia showing the largest positive anomaly of ~70%. The SO2 anomalies were negative for 2020 compared to 2015–2019 (between ~25 to 60%) for all regions. For CO, negative anomalies were observed for all regions with the largest decrease for South America of up to ~40%. The NO2/CO ratio indicated that specific sites (such as those in Spanish cities) were affected by biomass burning plumes, which outweighed the NO2 decrease due to the general reduction in mobility (ratio of ~60%). Analysis of the total oxidant (OX = NO2 + O3) showed that primary NO2 emissions at urban locations were greater than the O3 production, whereas at background sites, OX was mostly driven by the regional contributions rather than local NO2 and O3 concentrations. The present study clearly highlights the importance of meteorology and episodic contributions (e.g., from dust, domestic, agricultural biomass burning and crop fertilizing) when analysing air quality in and around cities even during large emissions reductions. There is still the need to better understand how the chemical responses of secondary pollutants to emission change under complex meteorological conditions, along with climate change and socio-economic drivers may affect future air quality. The implications for regional and global policies are also significant, as our study clearly indicates that PM2.5 concentrations would not likely meet the World Health Organization guidelines in many parts of the world, despite the drastic reductions in mobility. Consequently, revisions of air quality regulation (e.g., the Gothenburg Protocol) with more ambitious targets that are specific to the different regions of the world may well be required. ; World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric Watch programme is gratefully acknowledged for initiating and coordinating this study and for supporting this publication. We acknowledge the following projects for supporting the analysis contained in this article: Air Pollution and Human Health for an Indian Megacity project PROMOTE funded by UK NERC and the Indian MOES, Grant reference number NE/P016391/1; Regarding project funding from the European Commission, the sole responsibility of this publication lies with the authors. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This project has received funding from the European Commission's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 874990 (EMERGE project). European Regional Development Fund (project MOBTT42) under the Mobilitas Pluss programme; Estonian Research Council (project PRG714); Estonian Research Infrastructures Roadmap project Estonian Environmental Observatory (KKOBS, project 2014-2020.4.01.20-0281). European network for observing our changing planet project (ERA-PLANET, grant agreement no. 689443) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Estonian Ministry of Sciences projects (grant nos. P180021, P180274), and the Estonian Research Infrastructures Roadmap project Estonian Environmental Observatory (3.2.0304.11-0395). Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East—Climate and Atmosphere Research (EMME-CARE) project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement no. 856612) and the Government of Cyprus. INAR acknowledges support by the Russian government (grant number 14.W03.31.0002), the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (agreement 14.W0331.0006), and the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (14.W03.31.0008). We are grateful to to the following agencies for providing access to data used in our analysis: A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics Russian Academy of Sciences; Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell'Ambiente della Campania (ARPAC); Air Quality and Climate Change, Parks and Environment (MetroVancouver, Government of British Columbia); Air Quality Monitoring & Reporting, Nova Scotia Environment (Government of Nova Scotia); Air Quality Monitoring Network (SIMAT) and Emission Inventory, Mexico City Environment Secretariat (SEDEMA); Airparif (owner & provider of the Paris air pollution data); ARPA Lazio, Italy; ARPA Lombardia, Italy; Association Agréée de Surveillance de la Qualité de l'Air en Île-de-France AIRPARIF / Atmo-France; Bavarian Environment Agency, Germany; Berlin Senatsverwaltung für Umwelt, Verkehr und Klimaschutz, Germany; California Air Resources Board; Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India; CETESB: Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil. China National Environmental Monitoring Centre; Chandigarh Pollution Control Committee (CPCC), India. DCMR Rijnmond Environmental Service, the Netherlands. Department of Labour Inspection, Cyprus; Department of Natural Resources Management and Environmental Protection of Moscow. Environment and Climate Change Canada; Environmental Monitoring and Science Division Alberta Environment and Parks (Government of Alberta); Environmental Protection Authority Victoria (Melbourne, Victoria, Australia); Estonian Environmental Research Centre (EERC); Estonian University of Life Sciences, SMEAR Estonia; European Regional Development Fund (project MOBTT42) under the Mobilitas Pluss programme; Finnish Meteorological Institute; Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority; Haryana Pollution Control Board (HSPCB), IndiaLondon Air Quality Network (LAQN) and the Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN) supported by the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government; Madrid Municipality; Met Office Integrated Data Archive System (MIDAS); Meteorological Service of Canada; Ministère de l'Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques (Gouvernement du Québec); Ministry of Environment and Energy, Greece; Ministry of the Environment (Chile) and National Weather Service (DMC); Moscow State Budgetary Environmental Institution MOSECOMONITORING. Municipal Department of the Environment SMAC, Brazil; Municipality of Madrid public open data service; National institute of environmental research, Korea; National Meteorology and Hydrology Service (SENAMHI), Peru; New York State Department of Environmental Conservation; NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment; Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Canada; Public Health Service of Amsterdam (GGD), the Netherlands. Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB), India. Réseau de surveillance de la qualité de l'air (RSQA) (Montréal); Rosgydromet. Mosecomonitoring, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russia; Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 20–05–00254) SAFAR-IITM-MoES, India; São Paulo State Environmental Protection Agency, CETESB; Secretaria de Ambiente, DMQ, Ecuador; Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá, Colombia. Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente Rio de Janeiro; Mexico City Atmospheric Monitoring System (SIMAT); Mexico City Secretariat of Environment, Secretaría del Medio Ambiente (SEDEMA); SLB-analys, Sweden; SMEAR Estonia station and Estonian University of Life Sciences (EULS); SMEAR stations data and Finnish Center of Excellence; South African Weather Service and Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries through SAAQIS; Spanish Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge (MITECO); University of Helsinki, Finland; University of Tartu, Tahkuse air monitoring station; Weather Station of the Institute of Astronomy, Geophysics and Atmospheric Science of the University of São Paulo; West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB). ; Peer reviewed
"Thèse en cotutelle, Université Laval, Québec, Canada et Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli, Rome, Italie" ; La coopération réglementaire joue un rôle croissant dans la stratégie d'externalisation européenne. Cette recherche vise à améliorer la compréhension de ce phénomène en fournissant une typologie des différents formats réglementaires utilisés dans les accords commerciaux. Bien que les recherches antérieures se soient concentrées sur la variation entre les accords commerciaux de ces formats juridiques cette thèse concentre ses efforts sur la variation des formats juridiques à l'intérieur des accords, en particulier entre les secteurs réglementaires dans un seul accord. Récent ajout au réseau commercial européen, l'UE et le Canada ont présenté l'Accord Commercial Global et Économique (AECG) comme « l'étalon-or » pour la nouvelle génération d'accords commerciaux. Cette thèse examine donc ce traité référentiel et tente de répondre à la question suivante: quels sont les différents types de format réglementaire au sein de l'AECG, et comment expliquer la variation des types entre les secteurs réglementaires? En me référant à la littérature sur la légalisation internationale et à certaines de ses évolutions récentes, je propose deux dimensions pour construire une typologie de quatre types de «format réglementaire», à savoir: la nature de l'obligation (Hard / Soft ) et le mode de décision (Ex-ante/ ex-post). Quatre types de conception sont établis pour classer les différents schémas réglementaires possibles: Type 1 (Ex-Ante / Hard); Type 2 (Ex-Post / Hard); Type 3 (Ex-Ante /Soft); Type 4 (Ex-post / Soft). En examinant l'AECG, j'ai identifié 7 secteurs de réglementation institutionnalisés selon les quatre types mentionnés: biotechnologie, produits forestiers, indications géographiques, véhicules à moteur, produits pharmaceutiques, qualifications professionnelles et matières premières. Pour expliquer les processus de négociation aboutissant au choix des types de format juridique, j'ai mobilisé un cadre théorique institutionnaliste rationnel en suivant les prémisses du programme de recherche « rational design ». Ce modèle suit une compréhension structurelle du processus de négociation, composée de deux risques d'interdépendance affectant ses résultats de la négociation et donc le format juridique choisie : risque élevé / faible de «hold-up» et risque élevé / faible de shirking. Le risque de «hold-up» fait référence à une éventuelle renégociation des termes de l'accord et de ses potentielles conséquences pour les signataires. Elle pose que l'intégration économique résultant de la coopération peut rendre certains états plus dépendants et donc dans une position plus difficile pour résister à de nouvelles demandes de concessions. Le risque de « shirking » se rapporte à la littérature sur les mécanicismes de sanction et de non conformité. Il examine la possible défection par l'une des parties de ses obligations légales et son utilisation opportuniste des divergences réglementaires préexistantes ou existantes pour créer des barrières commerciales supplémentaires. Cette thèse postule que lorsqu'un risque de blocage est élevé, les négociateurs utiliseront une conception Ex-ante, ce qui limite la coopération dans le temps et réduit les futures situations d'otages. Si ce risque est faible, les parties à la négociation s'engagent pour une fonctionnalité de conception Ex-post. Un niveau élevé de risque de contournement se traduit plutôt par le recours à une obligation « hard » dans le but de réduire le risque possible de « shirking » des engagements juridiques. À l'opposé, lorsqu'un tel risque est faible, les parties préfèrent utiliser l'obligation « Soft » pour concevoir leur coopération. Pour expliquer la variation des types de conception, quatre hypothèses sont formulées: le type 1 est causé par des risques élevés de «hold-up» et élevé de « shirking », le type 2 par des risques faibles d' «hold-up» mais élevé de « shirking », le type 3 par des risques élevés d'«Hold-up» mais faible de « shirking », et Type 4 par des risques faibles d'« Hold-up » et de « shirking ». Les résultats soutiennent les quatre hypothèses pour six secteurs sur sept, la biotechnologie étant un cas déviant. Le type 3 est indirectement vérifié car il a été trouvé absent de l'AECG et aucun secteur avec ses résultats connexes n'a pu être trouvé. Pour les tests empiriques, une approche qualitative multiméthodes a été adoptée. Deux méthodes de comparaison ont été combinées: entre les cas et à l'intérieur des cas. L'analyse empirique est ainsi divisée en deux parties, la première compare les sept secteurs, tandis que la seconde utilise le traçage des processus pour chaque secteur. En termes de données, différentes sources sont exploitées: statistiques commerciales d'Eurostat, documents réglementaires et prises de position. J'ai également interviewé 24 organisations européennes et canadiennes représentant l'industrie ou les pouvoirs publics. ; Regulatory cooperation plays an increasing part in the European externalization strategy. This research aims for increasing the understanding of this phenomenon by providing a typology of different regulatory schemes used within trade agreements. While past research focused on legal design variation across trade agreements, this thesis concentrates its efforts on legal design variation intra-agreement, specifically variation between regulatory sectors. In a recent addition to the European trade network, the EU and Canada presented the Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) as the "gold standard" for the new generation of trade agreements.This thesis thus looks at this referential treaty and attempts to answer the following question: What are the different types of regulatory design within CETA, and how can the variationin types across regulatory sectors be explained? Based on the literature on international legalization I propose two dimensions of "regulatory design": nature of obligation (Hard/Soft) and mode of decision (Ex-ante/Ex-post). This typology establishes four design types that describe the different possible regulatory schemes: Type 1 (Ex-Ante/Hard); Type 2 (Ex-Post/Hard); Type 3 (Ex-Ante/Soft); Type 4 (Ex-post/Soft). Through reviewing CETA, I identify 7 regulatory sectors institutionalized within CETA according the four mentioned types: Biotechnology, Forest products, Geographical Indications, Motor Vehicles, Pharmaceutical Products, Professional Qualifications, Raw Materials. To explain the negotiation processes resulting in the choice of design types, I mobilize a Rational Institutionalist framework following the premises of the Rational Design research agenda. I develop an explanatory framework based on a structural understanding of the negotiating process.This structure is composed by two interdependence risks affecting the results of the negotiation and thus the design type : High/Low risk of "hold-up" and High/Low risk of shirking. The risk of "hold-up" refers to the possible future re-negotiation of the terms of the agreement and its consequences. It poses that the mutual economic integration resulting from cooperation could make such re-negotiation particularly damage for vulnerable parties. Shirking relates to the literature on enforcement and non-compliance issues. It looks at the possible defection by one party from its legal obligations and to the possibility that a party might opportunistically use preexisting or existing regulatory divergences to create additional barriers to trade.This thesis posits that when a risk of hold-up is High, negotiators will use an Ex-ante design, which limits in time cooperation and reduces future "hostage" situations. If this risk is Low, negotiating parties will commit to an Ex-post design. A high level of shirking risk results instead in the use of Hard obligation with the aim of reducing the possible risk of avoidance of legal commitments. At the opposite, when such a risk is low, parties will rather use Soft obligation to design their cooperation.To explain the variation of design types, three hypotheses are formulated: Type 1 is caused by High "hold-up" and High shirking risks, Type 2 by Low "hold-up" but High shirking, Type 3 by High "Hold-up" but Low shirking, and Type 4 by Low "Hold-up" and Low shirking. The results support the four hypotheses for six sectors out of seven, Biotech being a deviant case. Type 3 is indirectly verified as it is absent from CETA and no sectors with its related results could be found. For empirical testing, a qualitative multi-method approach was adopted. Two methods of comparison were combined: across-case and within-case. The empirical analysis is thus divided in two parts, the first one compares all seven sectors, while the second uses process-tracing for each sector. In terms of data, different sources are harnessed: trade statistics from Eurostat, regulatory documents and position papers. I also interviewed 24 European and Canadian organizations either representing industry or public authorities.
"Thèse en cotutelle : Université Laval, Québec, Canada, Philosophiæ doctor (Ph. D.) et Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France" ; Tableau d'honneur de la Faculté des études supérieures et postdoctorales, 2019-2020 ; Si Platon a choisi d'écrire des dialogues, c'est parce qu'ils illustrent le mouvement de la pensée et de la connaissance dans l'âme. Questionner et répondre permettent de réaliser sa propre ignorance. Toutefois, l'accès au savoir par le dialogue est plus difficile dès que l'on s'adresse à des âmes récalcitrantes ou à une foule, car un tel procédé prend du temps et nécessite la bonne volonté des participants. C'est le constat de cette difficulté à transmettre la vérité en politique que pose le Gorgias et auquel Platon cherche à remédier. Si le dialogue est impossible avec la foule, alors que la politique repose sur le soin des âmes de la cité, comment dès lors éduquer la masse ? Il faudrait développer un usage légitime de la rhétorique pour transmettre la vérité en politique. On considère souvent que ce projet de fondation ne s'effectue que dans les dialogues du Phèdre et des Lois. Pourtant, le Gorgias, qui se déroule pendant la guerre du Péloponnèse, ne se réduit pas à une critique de l'enseignement du célèbre rhéteur, Gorgias de Léontinoi. Au contraire, la remise en question épistémologique et morale de son « art oratoire » est la condition de possibilité de l'émergence d'une belle dêmêgoria (503a7). Le présent travail propose d'en faire l'étude en accordant une attention particulière au mouvement du dialogue et aux différents visages de la rhétorique qu'incarnent les personnages. On discernera trois étapes fondamentales dans le dialogue : la réception, la réfutation et la refondation dialectique de la rhétorique qui sont finalement reproduites à une échelle plus réduite et métaphorique dans le mythe eschatologique qui conclut l'oeuvre. Le premier moment permet de dégager les raisons de l'émergence de l'art oratoire à Athènes par une analyse du contexte polémique dans lequel le Gorgias a été écrit en tenant compte des multiples références qui ont été transposées par Platon (l'Éloge d'Hélène de Gorgias, les Cavaliers d'Aristophane, les Traités hippocratiques, le Contre les Sophistes d'Isocrate, La guerre du Péloponnèse de Thucydide et l'Antiope d'Euripide). La deuxième étape permet de saisir le double dévoilement de la rhétorique et du dialogue. D'un côté, Gorgias se révèle incapable de définir sa propre pratique et apparaît inconscient des conséquences dramatiques qu'elle engendre sur ses disciples. De l'autre, Socrate instaure un espace discursif dans lequel il peut réduire la rhétorique à une empirie en dégonflant ses prétentions épistémologiques (celle d'être un art) et politiques (celle d'être une puissance qui vise le plus grand des biens). Cette mise en parallèle de deux manières de parler permet d'opposer la maîtrise d'un savoir dialogique par Socrate à l'incompétence de Gorgias. Cette réfutation appelle un renversement complet de la conception de la justice, de la politique, et de l'existence. Affrontant ensuite Pôlos et Calliclès, Socrate analyse à la fois les conséquences néfastes de la rhétorique sur leurs âmes et sur la Cité, mettant en parallèle leur dégénérescence morale avec celle d'Athènes. Ce faisant, il s'attaque à deux confusions majeures qui sous-tendaient la pratique gorgianique du discours : penser que faire ce que l'on veut est un pouvoir qui rend libre et prendre le plaisir pour le bien. Le maître de Platon devient ainsi historien et juge de la politique corruptrice menée par les figures illustres d'Athènes que sont Thémistocle, Miltiade, Cimon et Périclès, livrant au passage une interprétation opposée à celle de Thucydide sur l'impérialisme athénien. Ce travail de sape de l'édifice rhétorique mène finalement à sa refondation. À partir de ces réfutations, Socrate théorise une nouvelle rhétorique dont il fait par ailleurs usage sur la personne de Calliclès. Ce nouvel emploi philosophique émerge à partir d'un ordre naturel. En effet, alors que Calliclès rejetait l'égalité imposée par la démocratie et appuyait sa thèse de l'homme fort sur une certaine vision de la nature, Socrate fondera précisément son renversement politique et judiciaire sur une conception naturelle et ordonnée, en considérant le cosmos. De l'ordre et de l'harmonie mathématique, il dégagera une égalité géométrique, proportionnelle, qui permettra de redonner sa juste place à la rhétorique. Ce renversement sera ultimement réalisé métaphoriquement dans le mythe eschatologique clôturant le dialogue. ; If Plato chose to write dialogues, it is because they illustrate the movement of thought and knowledge in the soul. The form of question and answer allows the recollection, beginning with the recollection of one's own ignorance. The access to knowledge through the practice of dialogue, however, is made more difficult once we take on recalcitrant souls or a crowd as interlocuters, for such a practice takes time and demands the goodwill of all concerned. It is this difficulty of transmitting truth in politics that the Gorgias lays bear and that Plato attempts to remedy. If dialogue is impossible with the crowd, even though politics rests on the care of citizens' souls, how then to educate the masses? One must develop a legitimate way of using rhetoric to transmit truth in politics. We often consider that this foundational project is carried out only in the Phaedrus and the Laws. Nevertheless, the Gorgias, which unfolds during the Peloponnesian War, cannot be reduced to a critique of the teachings of the celebrated rhetor, Gorgias of Leontini. On the contrary, by calling his "oratorical art" into question, both morally and epistemologically, one establishes the conditions for the emergence of a good dêmêgoria (503a7). This study proposes to examine Plato's questioning of Gorgias' art by affording particular attention to the movement of the dialogue and to the different faces of rhetoric embodied by its characters. We will set out three fundamental steps in the dialogue: the reception, refutation, and dialectical refoundation of rhetoric, which are finally reproduced metaphorically, though on a smaller scale, in the eschatological myth that concludes the work. The first moment allows us to identify the reasons for the emergence of the art of rhetoric in Athens through an analysis of the polemical context in which the Gorgias was written, taking into account the many literary references woven into the dialogue by Plato (e.g. to Gorgias' In Praise of Helen, Aristophanes' Knights, the Hippocratic Treatises, Isocrates' Against the Sophists, The Peloponnesian War of Thucydides, and Euripides' Antiope). The second step allows us to grasp the double unveiling of rhetoric and dialogue. On the one hand, Gorgias is revealed to be incapable of defining his own practice and appears unconscious of its dramatic effects on his disciples. On the other hand, Socrates creates a discursive space in which he can reduce rhetoric to set of empirical data by deflating its claims, both epistemological (i.e. that of being an art) and political (i.e. that of being a power that aims at the highest of goods). This paralleling of two ways of speaking allows us to contrast Socrates' mastery of dialogical knowledge with Gorgias' incompetence. This refutation calls for a complete reversal of our conception of justice, politics, and of existence itself. In his subsequent confrontations with Pôlos and Callicles, Socrates analyses both the harmful consequences of rhetoric on their souls and on the City, comparing their moral degeneracy with that of Athens. In doing so, he tackles two major confusions that underpinned the Gorgianic practice of oratory, namely, that freedom is to be found in doing what we want and that the good is to be found in pleasure. Plato's master thus becomes both historian and judge of the corrupting policies pursued by the great figures of Athenian politics, including Themistocles, Miltiades, Cimon, and Pericles, offering an interpretation of Athenian imperialism opposite to that of Thucydides. This work of undermining the rhetorical edifice ultimately leads to its re-foundation. From these refutations, Socrates theorises a new rhetoric, one that he puts into practice in his exchange with Callicles. This new philosophical use of rhetoric emerges from the natural order of things. Indeed, while Callicles rejects the equality imposed by democracy and bases his thesis of the strong man on a certain vision of nature, Socrates founds his own reimagining of politics and justice on a natural and ordered conception of the cosmos. From order and mathematical harmony, he will produce a geometric and proportional equality that will finally allow rhetoric to be restored to its rightful place. This last twist will be realized metaphorically in the eschatological myth that closes the dialogue.
Dans le monde actuel complexe, exigeant en connaissances et caractérisé par des cycles de vie de produits raccourcis, les PME reconnaissent l'importance de l'innovation pour être productives. Paradoxalement, cette volonté est limitée par leur manque de ressources ainsi que leur plus grande sensibilité au risque. Dans ce contexte, la collaboration en innovation ou plus généralement l'innovation ouverte (IO), permet aux PME de trouver les ressources d'innovation manquantes. À l'international en particulier, l'IO s'avère être une avenue porteuse pour permettre aux PME d'adapter leurs produits et services au contexte étranger, de réduire leur risque à l'international et, de ce fait, d'accroître leur compétitivité internationale. Cette thèse a ainsi comme principal objectif de faire avancer les connaissances autour de l'IO au sein des PME internationales. Plus précisément, elle analyse la littérature générale autour de l'IO au sein des PME, dresse un portrait des caractéristiques de l'IO avec des acteurs internationaux, en les comparant à celles de l'IO avec des acteurs nationaux, et identifie les limites de l'IO à l'international. Ainsi, elle favorise un transfert de connaissances auprès des gestionnaires, des intervenants et des décideurs politiques sur les caractéristiques, les limites et les conditions du recours à l'IO au sein des PME, non seulement au niveau de leur marché domestique, mais également à l'international. Dans cette logique, cette thèse se décline en trois principaux articles. Le premier article vise à définir la thématique centrale de cette recherche, à savoir l'IO au sein de la PME. Pour ce faire, une revue systématique de la littérature a été réalisée et a permis d'identifier les caractéristiques ainsi que les déterminants de l'IO au sein de la PME. Les caractéristiques sont tous les éléments qui permettent de définir le phénomène d'IO et d'identifier sa composition. L'étude des caractéristiques de l'IO a donc fait ressortir les principales pratiques adoptées par les PME pour la mise en œuvre de l'IO, les acteurs impliqués dans la mise en œuvre de l'IO et les outils mobilisés pour l'implémentation de l'IO au sein des PME. Les déterminants quant à eux, sont les facteurs qui ont une influence positive ou négative sur l'IO. Il s'agit d'éléments facilitateurs et inhibiteurs du recours à l'IO au sein de la PME. Ces déterminants ont été regroupés en cinq principales catégories : individuelles, organisationnelles, relationnelles, industrielles et contextuelles. Également, la revue systématique de la littérature introduit un cadre conceptuel intégrateur établissant des relations entre les caractéristiques et les déterminants de l'IO au sein de la PME, tout en identifiant les lacunes actuelles dans la littérature et en présentant des perspectives pour la recherche future. Ensuite, une étude empirique a permis d'affiner la compréhension du phénomène à l'étude. Cette étude a été réalisée auprès de gestionnaires de 40 PME internationales du Québec, des secteurs de la fabrication et des services et qui collaborent avec des partenaires externes dans différents projets de recherche et développement (R-D) ou de commercialisation. Ainsi, tout en s'inspirant des caractéristiques de l'IO établies dans le premier article (les pratiques, les acteurs et les outils), le deuxième article rend compte de la réalité de la pratique de l'IO par les PME à l'international. Plus précisément, il s'interroge sur la spécificité de l'IO par les PME avec des partenaires d'innovation internationaux (au sein des marchés étrangers) et la distinction réelle avec l'IO avec des partenaires d'innovation nationaux (au sein du marché domestique). Les analyses menées ont permis de conclure que, bien qu'il existe des similitudes entre l'IO au niveau national et international, il existe également plusieurs spécificités associées à chacun de ces niveaux tant en ce qui concerne les motivations, les pratiques, les acteurs et les outils de l'IO. À noter que les motivations de l'IO sont apparues comme une caractéristique supplémentaire de l'IO, induite par le terrain. Les résultats montrent que l'IO est utilisée différemment par les PME dans leurs opérations internationales ou domestiques et que la pratique de l'IO à ces deux échelles apparait comme complémentaire et non substituable. En effet, l'IO avec des partenaires nationaux permet aux PME d'accéder à des connaissances spécifiques des universités ou des centres de recherche et de financer des projets d'innovation par le biais de programmes gouvernementaux. À l'international, l'IO est un moyen pour les PME de mieux intégrer les marchés internationaux grâce à des collaborations avec des partenaires étrangers qui les aident à adapter leurs produits/services au contexte étranger, afin d'obtenir un avantage concurrentiel et accroître la légitimité sociale à l'international. Enfin, le troisième article s'inspire des déterminants identifiés lors de la revue systématique de la littérature du premier l'article et approfondit les limites à l'adoption de l'IO au sein des PME internationales. Il apparait ainsi que plusieurs limites à l'adoption de l'IO à l'international peuvent s'expliquer en fonction des quatre dimensions de la distance internationale, notamment les distances culturelle, institutionnelle, économique et géographique. Par ailleurs, l'identification de ces limites a permis de répertorier les moyens de les outrepasser, et donc, les facteurs de succès associés à l'IO au sein des PME internationales. Dans ce cadre, l'expérience internationale des dirigeants, une culture organisationnelle ouverte et innovante, le recours aux intermédiaires étrangers, les motivations sociales, l'adoption de modes d'entrée à l'international tels que la filiale ou la coentreprise, ainsi que l'utilisation des TIC atténuent les effets négatifs des limites identifiées et constituent quelques-uns des facteurs clés de succès associés à l'IO à l'international. ; In today's complex, knowledge-intensive world characterized by shortened product lifecycles, SMEs recognize the importance of innovation to be productive. Paradoxically, this desire is limited by their lack of resources and their greater sensitivity to risk. In this context, collaboration in innovation or, more generally, open innovation (OI) allows SMEs to find the missing innovation resources. Internationally, in particular, OI is proving to be a promising avenue for enabling SMEs to adapt their products and services to the foreign context, to reduce their international risk and, as a result, to increase their international competitiveness. The main objective of this thesis is thus to advance knowledge around OI within international SMEs. More precisely, this document analyzes the general literature around OI within SMEs, draws a portrait of the OI characteristics with international partners, comparing to national partners, and identifies the limits to international OI. Thus, it promotes a transfer of knowledge to managers, and political decision-makers on characteristics, limits and conditions of OI in SMEs, not only on their domestic market but also on their international market. In this logic, this thesis is divided into three main papers. The first paper aims to define the central theme of this research, namely OI in SMEs. A systematic literature review was carried out and made it possible to identify the characteristics and determinants of OI within SMEs. Characteristics are all the elements that define OI and identify its composition. Therefore, the study of OI characteristics highlighted the main practices adopted by SMEs for the OI implementation, the actors involved, and the tools mobilized. On the other hand, the determinants are the factors that positively or negatively influence OI. These are the facilitators and inhibitors of OI within the SME. These determinants have been grouped into four main categories: individual, organizational, relational and contextual. Also, the systematic review of the literature introduces an integrative conceptual framework making relationships between the characteristics and determinants of OI within SMEs while identifying current gaps in the literature and presenting perspectives for future research. Then, an empirical study made it possible to refine the understanding of the phenomenon. This study was carried out with managers of 40 international SMEs in Quebec, in manufacturing and service sectors, and collaborating with external partners in various research and development (R&D) or marketing projects. Thus, while drawing inspiration from the characteristics of OI established in the first paper (practices, actors and tools), the second paper reports on the reality of OI practice by SMEs in the international. More precisely, he questions the specificity of OI by SMEs with international innovation partners (within foreign markets) and the real distinction with OI with national innovation partners (within the domestic market). The analyzes have made it possible to conclude that although there are similarities between OI at the national and international level, there are also several specificities associated with each level regarding the OI motivations, OI practices, OI actors, and OI tools. Note that the OI motivations appeared as an additional characteristic induced by the field. The results show that OI is used differently by SMEs in their international or domestic operations and OI practices at these two scales appears to be complementary and not substitutable. Indeed, OI with national partners allows SMEs to access specific knowledge from universities or research centers and finance innovation projects through government programs. Internationally, OI enables SMEs to better integrate international markets through collaborations with foreign partners who help them adapt their products/services to the foreign context to obtain a competitive advantage and increase international social legitimacy. Finally, the third paper draws on the determinants identified during the systematic review of the literature in the first paper and delves into the limits to the adoption of OI within international SMEs. It thus appears that several limits to the adoption of the OI internationally can be explained according to the four dimensions of international distance, in particular cultural, institutional, economic and geographical distances. In addition, identifying these limits made it possible to identify the means of exceeding them, and therefore, the success factors associated with OI within international SMEs. In this context, the international experience of managers, an open and innovative organizational culture, the use of foreign intermediaries, social motivations, the adoption of international entry methods such as subsidiaries or joint ventures, and the use of ICT mitigate the harmful effects of the limitations identified and constitute some of the critical success factors associated with international OI.
"Thèse en cotutelle : Université Laval, Québec, Canada, Philosophiæ doctor (Ph. D.) et Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France" ; Ravagée par la guerre et occupée pendant plusieurs années, la France a été le théâtre de changements majeurs dans la manière dont ses dirigeants ont appréhendé son avenir au sein du Concert des Nations. Ces derniers étaient conscients de l'importance qu'a eue l'empire entre 1940 et 1945 et le rôle central qu'il avait pour le rétablissement de la légitimité du pays en tant que Puissance mondiale. Dans le domaine économique, les colonies étaient conçues comme un apport essentiel au relèvement de la France et pour sa prospérité. Les décideurs français ont ainsi consolidé les liens entre la métropole française et ses colonies pour fonder une politique impériale sur les principes du républicanisme selon lesquels la République était « une et indivisible ». Les hommes politiques français ont raffermi l'emprise de la France sur leurs territoires d'outre-mer par la création de l'Union française et ont donné un second souffle à la constitution d'un État-Empire, un projet entamé dans les années 1930. La dernière phase d'expansion de l'empire du dix-neuvième siècle faisait place alors depuis les années 1920 et 1930 à une logique de développement et de mise en branle des projets coloniaux de manière à créer un empire qui pouvait constituer un ensemble cohérent. La poursuite de cette logique du mythe colonial français après 1945 a eu pour effet de modifier l'identité de la France en tant qu'acteur du système international. La France n'était plus perçue par ses agents sub-étatiques comme un simple État possédant des colonies, mais bien comme une nouvelle entité dans laquelle ses excroissances dans l'outre-mer faisaient dorénavant partie intégrante de l'État et contribuaient à forger un avenir, qui était dès lors inextricablement partagé. Le bien-fondé de la mission civilisatrice de la France se traduisait dans cette période par un sentiment de devoir envers les territoires d'outre-mer ; le devoir de les amener au développement économique moderne et à un stade civilisationnel supérieur. Ces mêmes convictions ont conduit les gouvernements français à envisager une autre issue à cette relation que celle de l'indépendance totale, encouragée par les mouvements de décolonisation. Cette nouvelle identité a des effets tangibles sur la conception et l'engagement des décideurs et les haut-fonctionnaires français dans les projets destinés à rapprocher les économies européennes et dans la poursuite de l'intégration européenne. Dans le cas de la CECA, puisque cette institution sectorielle avait peu d'impacts sur la production d'outre-mer, on envisageait les bénéfices à une association entre les continents européen et africain comme marginaux. Cependant, le facteur colonial devenait de plus en plus influent dans les prises de décisions effectuées par les haut-fonctionnaires et analystes français du ministère des Affaires étrangères. Il a d'ailleurs constitué l'un des points d'achoppement dans les négociations de la mise en place d'une armée européenne, car l'article 38 du Traité instituant la CED ne prévoyait pas de mesures permettant à la France de conserver les moyens de poursuivre ses opérations de pacification dans l'empire ainsi que la guerre d'Indochine. C'est en ce sens qu'après l'échec de la CED le gouvernement français sous le leadership d'Edgar Faure a entrepris de mener des réformes de manière à trouver une solution durable au dilemme de la vocation européenne ou mondiale de la France. Des réformes politiques et économiques majeures étaient envisagées afin de transformer l'Union française en une association fédérale franco-africaine librement consentie. L'ensemble français ne pouvait donc plus être intégré partiellement à des initiatives européennes, car cela contreviendrait aux principes républicains renforcés par les réformes. Dans le contexte de la « relance européenne », le gouvernement sous Guy Mollet proposait de lier le marché commun européen aux territoires d'outre-mer, ce qui aurait permis l'ouverture des marchés africains aux échanges européens. Intégrées dans cette Eurafrique, les colonies auraient ainsi vu les bénéfices de conserver le lien politique avec la France. Cette thèse analyse la manière dont la souveraineté était comprise et imaginée par les dirigeants français pendant la construction européenne et lors du remodelage de leurs liens avec les anciennes colonies. Sans nier la portée de la souveraineté dans le cadre de l'existence d'un État, elle fut appelée à être modifiée ; ses éléments constitutifs furent repensés au profit d'une forme étatique supranationale. L'étude de ce nouveau modèle des relations internationales sera étendue aux alternatives que les dirigeants français ont proposées aux colonies africaines. Ces derniers les poussaient à dépasser le stade du nationalisme pour adhérer à un modèle étatique jugé supérieur : un stade post-westphalien dans lequel leurs revendications indépendantistes seraient caduques. ; Ravaged by years of occupation, France witnessed major changes in policymakers' vision of the country's future and of French interests and aims. They were aware of the importance of the empire during the war and the role it would play after the war in the restoration of France's international legitimacy as a Great Power. Colonies were also conceived as an essential element of France's revival and of its long-term prosperity. French decision-makers thus sought to strengthen links between the French metropole and its colonies in order to reassess its imperial identity, which was founded on republican principles. These politicians stiffened France's hold on its overseas territories with the implementation of the Union française and gave a second wind to the achievement of a State-Empire. The nineteenth century expansionary phase of the French empire had given way to another phase of imperialism in which development and progress of the overseas territories were at its core. The continuation of the colonial myth had profoundly modified French identity as a key player of the international system. France was no longer seen by its sub-national agents as a simple State holding colonies, but as a new form of statehood; an entity in which its overseas territories was now a constituent part of it and contributed to forging new perspective for their shared future. This new identity had a significant influence on how interests within the international system and particularly in Europe were pursued, especially within the European integration projects. Decisions makers in the French Fourth Republic evaluated their potential gains and preferences, first of all, through the lens of an Imperial Power. In other words, France's political and economic elite had first examined the inherent implications of the upholding of their pre-1940 empire on France's economic and geo-strategic needs, in the shifting context of early Cold War. Pro-European projects were therefore analyzed and weighed in regard to their costs and benefits, in the light of a new grid. Decision makers were influenced by the bien-fondé of French colonialism, based on the sentiment that France had a duty towards overseas territories; a duty of guiding them towards progress and civilization. It is with those considerations in mind that the French governments envisaged another solution to the question of its relationship with its colonies than total independence. The French stance on the European federal project was thus influenced by the introduction of a new variable in the equation of early European integration: the facteur colonial. In the early European integration process, it was considered marginal because of the sectoral approach of the ECSC. Although, the imperial identity was more and more apparent in the interests and policies pursued by the French government during the EDC debate. The introduction of a European army did not ensure France either the possibility of pursuing its peacekeeping operations in the overseas territories or the Indochina War. After the defeat of the EDC project in the French parliament, the government under the leadership of Edgar Faure envisioned a new set of reforms (political, administrative, and economic), which would transform the Union française into a consensual Franco-African federal political association. From this perspective, the ensemble français could not anymore be introduced partially within the European projects promoted in the wake of the « European revival ». Under Guy Mollet's government, a plan to establish supranational structures in their former colonies and in Europe was formulated so that free trade between the two continents could be established. With the economic benefits anticipated for the overseas territories, this Eurafrican project would have proved to African representatives that their interests lay in maintaining the political link between their territories and France. Accordingly, this thesis argues that French leaders questioned the international relations framework based on the nation-state as the central entity of the international system in order to conciliate their ambitions in Europe and as a State-Empire. These two projects – Franco- African association and European integration ̶ shared common characteristics and conceptual origins: supranationalism. French officials and policy-makers promoted a federal Eurafrican project to avoid the process of decolonization and create a political structure that would defuse difficult and pressing colonial issues. The former French colonies were asked to pass from the status of colonized territories to constituents of a supranational structure. The French decision makers pushed the overseas territories to transcend the stage of nationalism to reach an advanced statehood model: a post-Westphalian stage in which their demands for total independence would be obsolete. ; Résumé en espagnol
PMCID: PMC3319317.-- et al. ; [Background]: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified variants at 19p13.1 and ZNF365 (10q21.2) as risk factors for breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively. We explored associations with ovarian cancer and with breast cancer by tumor histopathology for these variants in mutation carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). [Methods]: Genotyping data for 12,599 BRCA1 and 7,132 BRCA2 mutation carriers from 40 studies were combined. [Results]: We confirmed associations between rs8170 at 19p13.1 and breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers [HR, 1.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.27; P = 7.42 × 10(-4)] and between rs16917302 at ZNF365 (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97; P = 0.017) but not rs311499 at 20q13.3 (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94-1.31; P = 0.22) and breast cancer risk for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Analyses based on tumor histopathology showed that 19p13 variants were predominantly associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, whereas rs16917302 at ZNF365 was mainly associated with ER-positive breast cancer for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. We also found for the first time that rs67397200 at 19p13.1 was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer for BRCA1 (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.29; P = 3.8 × 10(-4)) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.52; P = 1.8 × 10(-3)). [Conclusions]: 19p13.1 and ZNF365 are susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer and ER subtypes of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. [Impact]: These findings can lead to an improved understanding of tumor development and may prove useful for breast and ovarian cancer risk prediction for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. ; This research was supported by NIH grant CA128978, an NCI Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA116201), a U.S. Department of Defence Ovarian Cancer Idea award (W81XWH-10-1-0341), and grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and the Komen Foundation for the Cure. This work was also supported by Cancer Research UK (CR-UK) grants C12292/A11174 and C1287/A10118. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no. 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175). Support was also provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the "CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer" program and by the Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance-grant #019511. ; A.C. Antoniou is a CR-UK Senior Cancer Research Fellow. D.F. Easton is CR-UK Principal Research Fellow. G. Chenevix-Trench6 is a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellow. BFBOCC was supported by the Research Council of Lithuania grant LIG-19/2010 to R. Janavicius. BMBSA was supported by grants from the Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) to E.J. van Rensburg. BCFR was supported by the National Cancer Institute, NIH under RFA-CA-06-503 and through cooperative agreements with members of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) and Principal Investigators, including Cancer Care Ontario (U01 CA69467), Columbia University (U01 CA69398), Fox Chase Cancer Center (U01 CA69631), Huntsman Cancer Institute (U01 CA69446), Cancer Prevention Institute of California (formerly the Northern California Cancer Center; U01 CA69417), University of Melbourne (U01 CA69638), and Research Triangle Institute Informatics Support Center (RFP No. N02PC45022-46). CBCS was supported by The Neye Foundation. CNIO was partially supported by Fundación Mutua Madrileña, Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (FIS PI08 1120), and the Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF): BIO07/CA/006. CONSIT TEAM was supported by grants from Ministero della Salute (Extraordinary National Cancer Program 2006 "Alleanza contro il Cancro" to L. Varesco and P. Radice, and "Progetto Tumori Femminili" to P. Radice), Ministero dell'Universita' e Ricerca (RBLAO3-BETH to P. Radice), Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Special Project "Hereditary tumors" to P. Radice), Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (4017 to P. Pujol), and by funds from Italian citizens who allocated the 5 × 1,000 share of their tax payment in support of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, according to Italian laws (INT-Institutional strategic projects "5 × 1000"). ; The DKFZ study was supported by funds from the DKFZ. EMBRACE was supported by CR-UK Grants C1287/A10118 and C1287/A11990. D.G. Evans and Fiona Lalloo were supported by an NIHR grant to the Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK. The Investigators at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust were supported by an NIHR grant to the Biomedical Research Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. R.A. Eeles, Elizabeth Bancroft, and Lucia D'Mello were supported by CR-UK Grant C5047/A8385. GC-HBOC was supported by a grant of the German Cancer Aid (grant 109076) and by the Centre of Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC). The GEMO study was supported by the Ligue National Contre le Cancer; Association for International Cancer Research Grant (AICR-07-0454); and the Association "Le cancer du sein, parlons-en!" Award. The Georgetown study was supported by the Familial Cancer Registry at Georgetown University (NIH/NCI grant P30-CA051008), the Cancer Genetics Network (HHSN261200744000C), and Swing Fore the Cure. GOG was supported through funding provided by both intramural (Clinical Genetics Branch, DCEG) and extramural (Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Program—COPTRG) NCI programs. K. Phillips is the Cancer Council Victoria, Colebatch Clinical Research Fellow. HEBCS was supported by the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund, Academy of Finland (132473), the Finnish Cancer Society, and the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. The HEBON study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society grants NKI1998-1854, NKI2004-3088, NKI2007-3756, and the ZonMW grant 91109024. HUNBOCS was supported by the Hungarian Research Grant KTIA-OTKA CK-80745. ICO was supported by Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, Spanish Health Research Fund; Carlos III Health Institute; Catalan Health Institute and Autonomous Government of Catalonia; contract grant numbers ISCIIIRETIC RD06/0020/1051, PI10/01422, PI10/31488, and 2009SGR290. IHCC was supported by a Polish Foundation of Science award to K. Jaworska, a fellow of International PhD program, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Warsaw Medical University. ILUH was supported by the Icelandic Association "Walking for Breast Cancer Research" and by the Landspitali University Hospital Research Fund. ; INHERIT was supported with J. Simard, Chairholder of the Canada Research Chair in Oncogenetics. IOVHBOCS was supported by Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (MIUR), and "Ministero della Salute" ("Progetto Tumori Femminili and grant numbers RFPS 2006-5-341353, ACC2/R6.9"). kConFab was supported by grants from the National Breast Cancer Foundation, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), and by the Queensland Cancer Fund, the Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, and South Australia, and the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia. The kConFab Clinical Follow-Up Study was funded by the NHMRC [145684, 288704, 454508]. A.-B. Skytte is supported by a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship. A.K. Godwin was funded by U01CA69631, 5U01CA113916, and the Eileen Stein Jacoby Fund while at FCCC. The author acknowledges support from The University of Kansas Cancer Center and the Kansas Bioscience Authority Eminent Scholar Program. A.K. Godwin is the Chancellors Distinguished Chair in Biomedical Sciences endowed Professor. The McGill study was supported by the Jewish General Hospital Weekend to End Breast Cancer. M. Thomassen holds a Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec clinician-scientist award. The MSKCC study was supported by the Starr Cancer Consortium, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the Norman and Carol Stone Cancer Research Initiative, the Kate and Robert Niehaus Clinical Cancer Research Initiative, the Lymphoma Foundation, and the Sabin Family Research Initiative. The NCI study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the U.S. National Cancer Institute and by support services contracts NO2-CP-11019-50 and N02-CP-65504 with Westat, Inc. NNPIO was supported by the Russian Federation for Basic Research (grants 10-04-92601, 10-04-92110, 11-04-00227) and the Federal Agency for Science and Innovations (contract 16.512.11.2237). ; OCGN was supported by Cancer Care Ontario and the U.S. National Cancer Institute, NIH under RFA # CA-06-503 and through cooperative agreements with members of the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) and Principal Investigators. OSU-CCG was supported by the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. PBCS was supported by an Instituto Toscano Tumori grant to M.A. Caligo. SEABASS was supported by CARIF and University Malaya. The UCSF study was supported by the Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCSF, the Avon Foundation, and the Center for Translational and Policy Research in Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), NIH/NCI P01 CA130818-02A1. UKFOCR was supported by a project grant from CRUK to P.P.D. Pharoah. The UPENN study was supported Komen Foundation for the Cure to S.M. Domchek, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation to K.L. Nathanson, and NIH grants R01-CA083855 and R01-CA102776 to T.R. Rebbeck. WCRI was supported by the American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professorship #SIOP-06-258-06-COUN. ; Peer Reviewed
Las prácticas de defensa y protección de ecosistemas ejercidas por la sociedad civil organizada, representan una valiosa aportación a la comunidad, especialmente si éstas son reconocidas, legitimadas y apoyadas por el Estado. Dichas prácticas constituyen además un semillero para la educación ambiental no formal, promotora de participación social y de ejercicio de ciudadanía en un proceso holístico y retroactivo de enseñanza-aprendizaje, de aprehensión de cambios de conciencia, valores, actitudes, comportamientos, hábitos, conductas, consumos ambientalmente responsables.La educación ambiental no formal puede realizarse desde fuera, a través de un interventor social o un equipo de interventores que llegan a una comunidad, realizan un diagnóstico, definen, aplican y evalúan un programa apropiado para dicha comunidad, buscando siempre que la población se involucre en cada etapa del programa para que se lo apropie y se sienta comprometida con el mismo. Sin embargo, existe mayor riqueza cuando grupos comunitarios y organismos de base, comprometidos y orientados hacia la defensa y protección de ecosistemas terrestres y marinos, son reconocidos y legitimados por el Estado; sus prácticas entonces pueden contribuir a la co-construcción y a la coproducción de políticas públicas ambientales. Es decir, la propia comunidad ejerce ciudadanía y participa con la administración pública en la co-construcción de educación ambiental, de desarrollo local sustentable, de ordenamiento territorial, de definición e implementación de políticas públicas para, posteriormente, poner en práctica lo que se ha construido y llegar así a la co-producción. El siguiente ejemplo puede ilustrar mejor lo anterior……Es el año 1973, la escena se desarrolla en una región rica en recursos naturales, grandes espacios de bosques regados por abundantes manantiales, arroyos, lagos, ríos que cubren el territorio; riqueza y diversidad de flora y fauna están presentes, pero también egoístas ambiciones centradas en el propio beneficio y en el lucro económico. Es evidente que semejante escenario es un atractivo inevitable para industriales y desarrolladores económicos que autoregulan sus actividades justificando la creación de empleos a precio de deforestación y contaminación de suelos, aguas y atmósfera. Hasta aquí, este mismo escenario puede encontrarse actualmente en muy diversas regiones del mundo; este ejemplo hace referencia específicamente a la provincia de Quebec, en Canadá. En este contexto norteamericano, grupos de vecinos se organizaron en esa época para defender su territorio, crearon una red para fortalecerse al agrupar a otros organismos comunitarios. La fuerza de una red era necesaria y continúa siéndolo dado que los intereses del sector privado son frecuentemente apoyados y promovidos por el sector público, quien a su vez tiene también sus propios intereses, no siempre favorables para la población y el medio ambiente. Es así como el ejercicio de la ciudadanía cobró fuerza y grupos similares de la sociedad civil comenzaron a multiplicarse en este territorio, extendiéndose así esta red ambientalista en casi todas las regiones en las que está dividida la provincia de Quebec (en dieciséis de las diecisiete que hay en total).Dicha red es ahora el Consejo Regional del Medio Ambiente (CRE por sus siglas en francés: Conseil regional de l'environnement), organismo sin fines de lucro que en 1995 fue reconocido, legitimado y apoyado por el gobierno de Quebec con una subvención anual; es decir, esta legitimación llegó más de veinte años después de que se creó el primero de estos organismos en la región de Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean.Los CRE nacieron del deseo de grupos ambientalistas por crear un organismo regional de concertación en medio ambiente. Se trata de una plataforma que reúne ahora a representantes de otros organismos ambientalistas y sociales de cada región, así como también del sector público, privado, sindicatos, universidades y miembros individuales. Todos ellos voluntariamente se adhieren a esta red de la sociedad civil, con el fin de promover desde la base un desarrollo local sustentable en cada región, incluyendo en esto la difusión de la educación ambiental con programas a escolares, a jóvenes y a adultos, a ribereños para el cuidado y protección de sus lagos, a agricultores y ganaderos para el ejercicio sustentable de sus prácticas, etc.Los CRE son organismos de base autónomos; sin embargo, son reconocidos como interlocutores privilegiados del gobierno de Quebec en cuestiones ambientales. Los CRE agrupan a miembros diversos que persiguen objetivos comunes en un ejemplo de gobernanza cívica ambiental. Se trata de una red que representa un actor influyente en el dominio del medio ambiente en Quebec. Considerando las realidades locales y regionales, los CRE privilegian la acción, la concertación, la educación, la información, la sensibilización y el cuidado del medio ambiente para alcanzar sus objetivos. Se suscriben a valores fundamentales como la solidaridad, la equidad, la integridad, el respeto y la democracia (http://rncreq.org/cre.php)Para congregar a los dieciséis CRE, existe el RNCREQ (Regroupement national des conseils régionaux de l'environnement du Québec, http://rncreq.org/), organismo sin fines de lucro que además busca defender el derecho de los ciudadanos a participar en debates públicos, principalmente los organizados por el BAPE (Bureau d'audiences publiques sur l'environnement), instancia pública del gobierno provincial. El BAPE da a conocer en audiencias públicas los proyectos de desarrollo local o que competen al medio ambiente, esto con el fin de que la sociedad civil y los diversos actores sociales manifiesten su aceptación o rechazo del proyecto propuesto generalmente por los sectores público y privado (http://www.bape.gouv.qc.ca/).El RNCREQ, a través de los 16 CRE que se encuentran en la provincia de Quebec, agrupa actualmente a 1,850 miembros, divididos de la siguiente forma: 351 pertenecientes a organismos ambientalistas; 363 a gobiernos locales; 274 a organismos públicos; 149 a corporaciones privadas; 543 son miembros individuales y 170 tienen otras adscripciones.Este ejemplo permite apreciar la fuerza adquirida por la sociedad civil organizada cuando es ella misma quien se apropia de su territorio, defiende y protege sus ecosistemas mediante prácticas legitimadas y apoyadas por un Estado democrático, creador de espacios para promoción y desarrollo de ejercicio de ciudadanía.Por otro lado, el estado de Veracruz, en México, rico en recursos naturales, está dividido en diez regiones dentro de las cuales hay diversos grupos comunitarios y ONG comprometidos con la defensa y protección del medio ambiente; la población que participa en este tipo de organismos ya cuenta con un cierto nivel de educación ambiental y practica el ejercicio de su ciudadanía, además son ellos quienes mejor conocen su entorno. Sin embargo, entre otras cosas, falta aún la fuerza que puede proporcionar un organismo red, legitimado y autónomo, como plataforma para congregar a representantes de otros organismos comunitarios, grupos de vecinos, individuos y miembros del sector público y privado interesados en participar en la defensa y protección de los ecosistemas de cada región.Recientemente, la Comisión de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Aguas del Congreso de Veracruz, presentó una iniciativa de reforma al artículo 186 de la Ley Estatal de Protección Ambiental; dicha reforma ya fue aprobada y tiene la finalidad de crear en cada Ayuntamiento del estado de Veracruz el Consejo Municipal de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. Se busca que dicho Consejo permita la participación de ciudadanos, académicos, empresarios y funcionarios municipales en la proposición de estrategias, acciones, políticas públicas, toma de decisiones en temas ambientales y vigilancia del manejo del presupuesto destinado a la protección del medio ambiente, gozando además de autonomía aunque se trate de organismos públicos. Habrá entonces 212 Consejos de este tipo en todo el estado, uno en cada municipio, en los próximos tres meses, plazo que se fijó para su instalación.[1] Quizá sería entonces conveniente que en cada una de las diez regiones del territorio veracruzano se instalara también un Consejo Regional responsable de dar seguimiento a las actividades, programas y propuestas realizadas por cada uno de los Consejos Municipales de su territorio; esto, porque supervisar a 212 Consejos parece más complejo. Además, la cercanía entre los municipios hace que algunos de los problemas que afectan al medio ambiente y a la población sean comunes entre ellos; se pueden permitir entonces alianzas intermunicipales, trabajo en proyectos conjuntos, optimización de recursos y fuerza con la participación de más actores sociales.A diferencia del ejemplo de los CRE en la provincia de Quebec, los Consejos Municipales de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable que se instalarán en el estado de Veracruz no son precisamente una iniciativa de la sociedad civil. Se trata sin embargo de una buena iniciativa del Estado; sólo se espera que realmente se escuchen y se favorezcan los intereses de la población y que la orientación sea hacia un verdadero desarrollo local sustentable, en un contexto de equidad, de democracia, de autonomía, de justicia social y ambiental. [1]http://hoyveracruz.com.mx/notas/14719/Corre-plazo-para-crear-consejos-municipales-de-medio-Ambiente.html. http://www.veracruzanos.info/2011/05/presenta-ainara-rementeria-iniciativa-de-reforma-a-ley-estatal-de-proteccion-ambiental/
Publisher's version (útgefin grein) ; Breast cancer is a common disease partially caused by genetic risk factors. Germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair genes BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2 are associated with breast cancer risk. FANCM, which encodes for a DNA translocase, has been proposed as a breast cancer predisposition gene, with greater effects for the ER-negative and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes. We tested the three recurrent protein-truncating variants FANCM:p.Arg658*, p.Gln1701*, and p.Arg1931* for association with breast cancer risk in 67,112 cases, 53,766 controls, and 26,662 carriers of pathogenic variants of BRCA1 or BRCA2. These three variants were also studied functionally by measuring survival and chromosome fragility in FANCM−/− patient-derived immortalized fibroblasts treated with diepoxybutane or olaparib. We observed that FANCM:p.Arg658* was associated with increased risk of ER-negative disease and TNBC (OR = 2.44, P = 0.034 and OR = 3.79; P = 0.009, respectively). In a country-restricted analysis, we confirmed the associations detected for FANCM:p.Arg658* and found that also FANCM:p.Arg1931* was associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk (OR = 1.96; P = 0.006). The functional results indicated that all three variants were deleterious affecting cell survival and chromosome stability with FANCM:p.Arg658* causing more severe phenotypes. In conclusion, we confirmed that the two rare FANCM deleterious variants p.Arg658* and p.Arg1931* are risk factors for ER-negative and TNBC subtypes. Overall our data suggest that the effect of truncating variants on breast cancer risk may depend on their position in the gene. Cell sensitivity to olaparib exposure, identifies a possible therapeutic option to treat FANCM-associated tumors. ; Peterlongo laboratory is supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC; IG2015 no.16732) to P. Peterlongo and by a fellowship from Fondazione Umberto Veronesi to G. Figlioli. Surrallés laboratory is supported by the ICREA-Academia program, the Spanish Ministry of Health (projects FANCOSTEM and FANCOLEN), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competiveness (projects CB06/07/0023 and RTI2018-098419-B-I00), the European Commission (EUROFANCOLEN project HEALTH-F5-2012-305421 and P-SPHERE COFUND project), the Fanconi Anemia Research Fund Inc, and the "Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, una manera de hacer Europa" (FEDER). CIBERER is an initiative of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain. BCAC: we thank all the individuals who took part in these studies and all the researchers, clinicians, technicians and administrative staff who have enabled this work to be carried out. ABCFS thank Maggie Angelakos, Judi Maskiell, Tu Nguyen-Dumont is a National Breast Cancer Foundation (Australia) Career Development Fellow. ABCS thanks the Blood bank Sanquin, The Netherlands. Samples are made available to researchers on a non-exclusive basis. BCEES thanks Allyson Thomson, Christobel Saunders, Terry Slevin, BreastScreen Western Australia, Elizabeth Wylie, Rachel Lloyd. The BCINIS study would not have been possible without the contributions of Dr. Hedy Rennert, Dr. K. Landsman, Dr. N. Gronich, Dr. A. Flugelman, Dr. W. Saliba, Dr. E. Liani, Dr. I. Cohen, Dr. S. Kalet, Dr. V. Friedman, Dr. O. Barnet of the NICCC in Haifa, and all the contributing family medicine, surgery, pathology and oncology teams in all medical institutes in Northern Israel. The BREOGAN study would not have been possible without the contributions of the following: Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Jose Esteban Castelao, Angel Carracedo, Victor Muñoz Garzón, Alejandro Novo Domínguez, Maria Elena Martinez, Sara Miranda Ponte, Carmen Redondo Marey, Maite Peña Fernández, Manuel Enguix Castelo, Maria Torres, Manuel Calaza (BREOGAN), José Antúnez, Máximo Fraga and the staff of the Department of Pathology and Biobank of the University Hospital Complex of Santiago-CHUS, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago, IDIS, Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Santiago-SERGAS; Joaquín González-Carreró and the staff of the Department of Pathology and Biobank of University Hospital Complex of Vigo, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica Galicia Sur, SERGAS, Vigo, Spain. BSUCH thanks Peter Bugert, Medical Faculty Mannheim. CBCS thanks study participants, co-investigators, collaborators and staff of the Canadian Breast Cancer Study, and project coordinators Agnes Lai and Celine Morissette. CCGP thanks Styliani Apostolaki, Anna Margiolaki, Georgios Nintos, Maria Perraki, Georgia Saloustrou, Georgia Sevastaki, Konstantinos Pompodakis. CGPS thanks staff and participants of the Copenhagen General Population Study. For the excellent technical assistance: Dorthe Uldall Andersen, Maria Birna Arnadottir, Anne Bank, Dorthe Kjeldgård Hansen. The Danish Cancer Biobank is acknowledged for providing infrastructure for the collection of blood samples for the cases. Investigators from the CPS-II cohort thank the participants and Study Management Group for their invaluable contributions to this research. They also acknowledge the contribution to this study from central cancer registries supported through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Program of Cancer Registries, as well as cancer registries supported by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program. The CTS Steering Committee includes Leslie Bernstein, Susan Neuhausen, James Lacey, Sophia Wang, Huiyan Ma, and Jessica Clague DeHart at the Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Dennis Deapen, Rich Pinder, and Eunjung Lee at the University of Southern California, Pam Horn-Ross, Peggy Reynolds, Christina Clarke Dur and David Nelson at the Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, and Hannah Park at the University of California Irvine, and Fred Schumacher at Case Western University. DIETCOMPLYF thanks the patients, nurses and clinical staff involved in the study. The DietCompLyf study was funded by the charity Against Breast Cancer (Registered Charity Number 1121258) and the NCRN. We thank the participants and the investigators of EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition). ESTHER thanks Hartwig Ziegler, Sonja Wolf, Volker Hermann, Christa Stegmaier, Katja Butterbach. FHRISK thanks NIHR for funding. GC-HBOC thanks Stefanie Engert, Heide Hellebrand, Sandra Kröber and LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (Markus Loeffler, Joachim Thiery, Matthias Nüchter, Ronny Baber). The GENICA Network: Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, and University of Tübingen, Germany [HB, Wing-Yee Lo], German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) [HB], Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2180 - 390900677 [HB], Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany [Yon-Dschun Ko, Christian Baisch], Institute of Pathology, University of Bonn, Germany [Hans-Peter Fischer], Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany [Ute Hamann], Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany [TB, Beate Pesch, Sylvia Rabstein, Anne Lotz]; and Institute of Occupational Medicine and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany [Volker Harth]. HABCS thanks Michael Bremer. HEBCS thanks Heidi Toiminen, Kristiina Aittomäki, Irja Erkkilä and Outi Malkavaara. HMBCS thanks Peter Hillemanns, Hans Christiansen and Johann H. Karstens. HUBCS thanks Shamil Gantsev. KARMA thanks the Swedish Medical Research Counsel. KBCP thanks Eija Myöhänen, Helena Kemiläinen. LMBC thanks Gilian Peuteman, Thomas Van Brussel, EvyVanderheyden and Kathleen Corthouts. MABCS thanks Milena Jakimovska (RCGEB "Georgi D. Efremov), Katerina Kubelka, Mitko Karadjozov (Adzibadem-Sistina" Hospital), Andrej Arsovski and Liljana Stojanovska (Re-Medika" Hospital) for their contributions and commitment to this study. MARIE thanks Petra Seibold, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Judith Heinz, Nadia Obi, Alina Vrieling, Sabine Behrens, Ursula Eilber, Muhabbet Celik, Til Olchers and Stefan Nickels. MBCSG (Milan Breast Cancer Study Group) thanks Daniela Zaffaroni, Irene Feroce, and the personnel of the Cogentech Cancer Genetic Test Laboratory. We thank the coordinators, the research staff and especially the MMHS participants for their continued collaboration on research studies in breast cancer. MSKCC thanks Marina Corines and Lauren Jacobs. MTLGEBCS would like to thank Martine Tranchant (CHU de Québec Research Center), Marie-France Valois, Annie Turgeon and Lea Heguy (McGill University Health Center, Royal Victoria Hospital; McGill University) for DNA extraction, sample management and skillful technical assistance. J.S. is Chairholder of the Canada Research Chair in Oncogenetics. NBHS thanks study participants and research staff for their contributions and commitment to the studies. We would like to thank the participants and staff of the Nurses' Health Study and Nurses' Health Study II for their valuable contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and those of participating registries as required. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data. OFBCR thanks Teresa Selander and Nayana Weerasooriya. ORIGO thanks E. Krol-Warmerdam, and J. Blom for patient accrual, administering questionnaires, and managing clinical information. PBCS thanks Louise Brinton, Mark Sherman, Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Beata Peplonska, Witold Zatonski, Pei Chao and Michael Stagner. The ethical approval for the POSH study is MREC /00/6/69, UKCRN ID: 1137. We thank staff in the Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC) supported Faculty of Medicine Tissue Bank and the Faculty of Medicine DNA Banking resource. PREFACE thanks Sonja Oeser and Silke Landrith. PROCAS thanks NIHR for funding. RBCS thanks Petra Bos, Jannet Blom, Ellen Crepin, Elisabeth Huijskens, Anja Kromwijk-Nieuwlaat, Annette Heemskerk, the Erasmus MC Family Cancer Clinic. We thank the SEARCH and EPIC teams. SKKDKFZS thanks all study participants, clinicians, family doctors, researchers and technicians for their contributions and commitment to this study. We thank the SUCCESS Study teams in Munich, Duessldorf, Erlangen and Ulm. SZBCS thanks Ewa Putresza. UCIBCS thanks Irene Masunaka. UKBGS thanks Breast Cancer Now and the Institute of Cancer Research for support and funding of the Breakthrough Generations Study, and the study participants, study staff, and the doctors, nurses and other health care providers and health information sources who have contributed to the study. We acknowledge NHS funding to the Royal Marsden/ICR NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. CIMBA: we are grateful to all the families and clinicians who contribute to the studies; Sue Healey, in particular taking on the task of mutation classification with the late Olga Sinilnikova; Maggie Angelakos, Judi Maskiell, Helen Tsimiklis; members and participants in the New York site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry; members and participants in the Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry; Vilius Rudaitis and Laimonas Griškevičius; Yuan Chun Ding and Linda Steele for their work in participant enrollment and biospecimen and data management; Bent Ejlertsen and Anne-Marie Gerdes for the recruitment and genetic counseling of participants; Alicia Barroso, Rosario Alonso and Guillermo Pita; all the individuals and the researchers who took part in CONSIT TEAM (Consorzio Italiano Tumori Ereditari Alla Mammella), thanks in particular: Giulia Cagnoli, Roberta Villa, Irene Feroce, Mariarosaria Calvello, Riccardo Dolcetti, Giuseppe Giannini, Laura Papi, Gabriele Lorenzo Capone, Liliana Varesco, Viviana Gismondi, Maria Grazia Tibiletti, Daniela Furlan, Antonella Savarese, Aline Martayan, Stefania Tommasi, Brunella Pilato, Isabella Marchi, Elena Bandieri, Antonio Russo, Daniele Calistri and the personnel of the Cogentech Cancer Genetic Test Laboratory, Milan, Italy. FPGMX: members of the Cancer Genetics group (IDIS): Ana Blanco, Miguel Aguado, Uxía Esperón and Belinda Rodríguez. We thank all participants, clinicians, family doctors, researchers, and technicians for their contributions and commitment to the DKFZ study and the collaborating groups in Lahore, Pakistan (Noor Muhammad, Sidra Gull, Seerat Bajwa, Faiz Ali Khan, Humaira Naeemi, Saima Faisal, Asif Loya, Mohammed Aasim Yusuf) and Bogota, Colombia (Diana Torres, Ignacio Briceno, Fabian Gil). Genetic Modifiers of Cancer Risk in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers (GEMO) study is a study from the National Cancer Genetics Network UNICANCER Genetic Group, France. We wish to pay a tribute to Olga M. Sinilnikova, who with Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet initiated and coordinated GEMO until she sadly passed away on the 30th June 2014. The team in Lyon (Olga Sinilnikova, Mélanie Léoné, Laure Barjhoux, Carole Verny-Pierre, Sylvie Mazoyer, Francesca Damiola, Valérie Sornin) managed the GEMO samples until the biological resource centre was transferred to Paris in December 2015 (Noura Mebirouk, Fabienne Lesueur, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet). We want to thank all the GEMO collaborating groups for their contribution to this study. Drs.Sofia Khan, Irja Erkkilä and Virpi Palola; The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON) consists of the following Collaborating Centers: Netherlands Cancer Institute (coordinating center), Amsterdam, NL: M.A. Rookus, F.B.L. Hogervorst, F.E. van Leeuwen, M.A. Adank, M.K. Schmidt, N.S. Russell, D.J. Jenner; Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, NL: J.M. Collée, A.M.W. van den Ouweland, M.J. Hooning, C.M. Seynaeve, C.H.M. van Deurzen, I.M. Obdeijn; Leiden University Medical Center, NL: C.J. van Asperen, P. Devilee, T.C.T.E.F. van Cronenburg; Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, NL: C.M. Kets, A.R. Mensenkamp; University Medical Center Utrecht, NL: M.G.E.M. Ausems, M.J. Koudijs; Amsterdam Medical Center, NL: C.M. Aalfs, H.E.J. Meijers-Heijboer; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, NL: K. van Engelen, J.J.P. Gille; Maastricht University Medical Center, NL: E.B. Gómez-Garcia, M.J. Blok; University of Groningen, NL: J.C. Oosterwijk, A.H. van der Hout, M.J. Mourits, G.H. de Bock; The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL): S. Siesling, J.Verloop; The nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in The Netherlands (PALGA): A.W. van den Belt-Dusebout. HEBON thanks the study participants and the registration teams of IKNL and PALGA for part of the data collection. Overbeek; the Hungarian Breast and Ovarian Cancer Study Group members (Janos Papp, Aniko Bozsik, Zoltan Matrai, Miklos Kasler, Judit Franko, Maria Balogh, Gabriella Domokos, Judit Ferenczi, Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary) and the clinicians and patients for their contributions to this study; HVH (University Hospital Vall d'Hebron) the authors acknowledge the Oncogenetics Group (VHIO) and the High Risk and Cancer Prevention Unit of the University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Miguel Servet Progam (CP10/00617), and the Cellex Foundation for providing research facilities and equipment; the ICO Hereditary Cancer Program team led by Dr. Gabriel Capella; the ICO Hereditary Cancer Program team led by Dr. Gabriel Capella; Dr Martine Dumont for sample management and skillful assistance; Catarina Santos and Pedro Pinto; members of the Center of Molecular Diagnosis, Oncogenetics Department and Molecular Oncology Research Center of Barretos Cancer Hospital; Heather Thorne, Eveline Niedermayr, all the kConFab investigators, research nurses and staff, the heads and staff of the Family Cancer Clinics, and the Clinical Follow Up Study (which has received funding from the NHMRC, the National Breast Cancer Foundation, Cancer Australia, and the National Institute of Health (USA)) for their contributions to this resource, and the many families who contribute to kConFab; the investigators of the Australia New Zealand NRG Oncology group; members and participants in the Ontario Cancer Genetics Network; Kevin Sweet, Caroline Craven, Julia Cooper, Amber Aielts, and Michelle O'Conor; Christina Selkirk; Helena Jernström, Karin Henriksson, Katja Harbst, Maria Soller, Ulf Kristoffersson; from Gothenburg Sahlgrenska University Hospital: Anna Öfverholm, Margareta Nordling, Per Karlsson, Zakaria Einbeigi; from Stockholm and Karolinska University Hospital: Anna von Wachenfeldt, Annelie Liljegren, Annika Lindblom, Brita Arver, Gisela Barbany Bustinza; from Umeå University Hospital: Beatrice Melin, Christina Edwinsdotter Ardnor, Monica Emanuelsson; from Uppsala University: Hans Ehrencrona, Maritta Hellström Pigg, Richard Rosenquist; from Linköping University Hospital: Marie Stenmark-Askmalm, Sigrun Liedgren; Cecilia Zvocec, Qun Niu; Joyce Seldon and Lorna Kwan; Dr. Robert Nussbaum, Beth Crawford, Kate Loranger, Julie Mak, Nicola Stewart, Robin Lee, Amie Blanco and Peggy Conrad and Salina Chan; Carole Pye, Patricia Harrington and Eva Wozniak. OSUCCG thanks Kevin Sweet, Caroline Craven, Julia Cooper, Michelle O'Conor and Amber Aeilts. BCAC is funded by Cancer Research UK [C1287/A16563, C1287/A10118], the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant numbers 634935 and 633784 for BRIDGES and B-CAST respectively), and by the European Community´s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement number 223175 (grant number HEALTH-F2-2009-223175) (COGS). The EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme funding source had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the report. Genotyping of the OncoArray was funded by the NIH Grant U19 CA148065, and Cancer UK Grant C1287/A16563 and the PERSPECTIVE project supported by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant GPH-129344) and, the Ministère de l'Économie, Science et Innovation du Québec through Genome Québec and the PSRSIIRI-701 grant, and the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation. The Australian Breast Cancer Family Study (ABCFS) was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute (USA). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the USA Government or the BCFR. The ABCFS was also supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, the New South Wales Cancer Council, the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation (Australia) and the Victorian Breast Cancer Research Consortium. J.L.H. is a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Principal Research Fellow. M.C.S. is a NHMRC Senior Research Fellow. The ABCS study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society [grants NKI 2007-3839; 2009 4363]. The Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB) was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, The Cancer Institute NSW and the National Breast Cancer Foundation. The AHS study is supported by the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health, the National Cancer Institute (grant number Z01-CP010119), and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (grant number Z01-ES049030). The work of the BBCC was partly funded by ELAN-Fond of the University Hospital of Erlangen. The BBCS is funded by Cancer Research UK and Breast Cancer Now and acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, and the National Cancer Research Network (NCRN). The BCEES was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia and the Cancer Council Western Australia. For the BCFR-NY, BCFR-PA, BCFR-UT this work was supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute. The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government or the BCFR. BCINIS study was funded by the BCRF (The Breast Cancer Research Foundation, USA). The BREast Oncology GAlician Network (BREOGAN) is funded by Acción Estratégica de Salud del Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS PI12/02125/Cofinanciado FEDER; Acción Estratégica de Salud del Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS Intrasalud (PI13/01136); Programa Grupos Emergentes, Cancer Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigacion Biomedica Galicia Sur. Xerencia de Xestion Integrada de Vigo-SERGAS, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain; Grant 10CSA012E, Consellería de Industria Programa Sectorial de Investigación Aplicada, PEME I + D e I + D Suma del Plan Gallego de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica de la Consellería de Industria de la Xunta de Galicia, Spain; Grant EC11-192. Fomento de la Investigación Clínica Independiente, Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Spain; and Grant FEDER-Innterconecta. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Xunta de Galicia, Spain. The BSUCH study was supported by the Dietmar-Hopp Foundation, the Helmholtz Society and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). Sample collection and processing was funded in part by grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI R01CA120120 and K24CA169004). CBCS is funded by the Canadian Cancer Society (grant # 313404) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CCGP is supported by funding from the University of Crete. The CECILE study was supported by Fondation de France, Institut National du Cancer (INCa), Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire, de l'Alimentation, de l'Environnement et du Travail (ANSES), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR). The CGPS was supported by the Chief Physician Johan Boserup and Lise Boserup Fund, the Danish Medical Research Council, and Herlev and Gentofte Hospital. The American Cancer Society funds the creation, maintenance, and updating of the CPS-II cohort. The CTS was initially supported by the California Breast Cancer Act of 1993 and the California Breast Cancer Research Fund (contract 97-10500) and is currently funded through the National Institutes of Health (R01 CA77398, K05 CA136967, UM1 CA164917, and U01 CA199277). Collection of cancer incidence data was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885. The University of Westminster curates the DietCompLyf database funded by Against Breast Cancer Registered Charity No. 1121258 and the NCRN. The coordination of EPIC is financially supported by the European Commission (DG-SANCO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The national cohorts are supported by: Ligue Contre le Cancer, Institut Gustave Roussy, Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) (France); German Cancer Aid, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Germany); the Hellenic Health Foundation, the Stavros Niarchos Foundation (Greece); Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro-AIRC-Italy and National Research Council (Italy); Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR), LK Research Funds, Dutch Prevention Funds, Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland), World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), Statistics Netherlands (The Netherlands); Health Research Fund (FIS), PI13/00061 to Granada, PI13/01162 to EPIC-Murcia, Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra, ISCIII RETIC (RD06/0020) (Spain); Cancer Research UK (14136 to EPIC-Norfolk; C570/A16491 and C8221/A19170 to EPIC-Oxford), Medical Research Council (1000143 to EPIC-Norfolk, MR/M012190/1 to EPIC-Oxford) (United Kingdom). The ESTHER study was supported by a grant from the Baden Württemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Arts. Additional cases were recruited in the context of the VERDI study, which was supported by a grant from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe). FHRISK is funded from NIHR grant PGfAR 0707-10031. The GC-HBOC (German Consortium of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer) is supported by the German Cancer Aid (grant no 110837, coordinator: Rita K. Schmutzler, Cologne). This work was also funded by the European Regional Development Fund and Free State of Saxony, Germany (LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, project numbers 713-241202, 713-241202, 14505/2470, 14575/2470). The GENICA was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany grants 01KW9975/5, 01KW9976/8, 01KW9977/0 and 01KW0114, the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, the Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, as well as the Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, Bonn, Germany. The GEPARSIXTO study was conducted by the German Breast Group GmbH. The GESBC was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e. V. [70492] and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). The HABCS study was supported by the Claudia von Schilling Foundation for Breast Cancer Research, by the Lower Saxonian Cancer Society, and by the Rudolf Bartling Foundation. The HEBCS was financially supported by the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund, Academy of Finland (266528), the Finnish Cancer Society, and the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. The HMBCS was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (Do 761/10-1). The HUBCS was supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (RUS08/017), and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations for support the Bioresource collections and RFBR grants 14-04-97088, 17-29-06014 and 17-44-020498. E.K was supported by the program for support the bioresource collections №007-030164/2 and study was performed as part of the assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation (№АААА-А16-116020350032-1). Financial support for KARBAC was provided through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Cancer Society, The Gustav V Jubilee foundation and Bert von Kantzows foundation. The KARMA study was supported by Märit and Hans Rausings Initiative Against Breast Cancer. The KBCP was financially supported by the special Government Funding (EVO) of Kuopio University Hospital grants, Cancer Fund of North Savo, the Finnish Cancer Organizations, and by the strategic funding of the University of Eastern Finland. LMBC is supported by the 'Stichting tegen Kanker'. DL is supported by the FWO. The MABCS study is funded by the Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology "Georgi D. Efremov" and supported by the German Academic Exchange Program, DAAD. The MARIE study was supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. [70-2892-BR I, 106332, 108253, 108419, 110826, 110828], the Hamburg Cancer Society, the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany [01KH0402]. MBCSG is supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) and by funds from the Italian citizens who allocated the 5/1000 share of their tax payment in support of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, according to Italian laws (INT-Institutional strategic projects "5 × 1000"). The MCBCS was supported by the NIH grants CA192393, CA116167, CA176785 an NIH Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer [CA116201], and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and a generous gift from the David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation. MCCS cohort recruitment was funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria. The MCCS was further supported by Australian NHMRC grants 209057 and 396414, and by infrastructure provided by Cancer Council Victoria. Cases and their vital status were ascertained through the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR) and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), including the National Death Index and the Australian Cancer Database. The MEC was support by NIH grants CA63464, CA54281, CA098758, CA132839 and CA164973. The MISS study is supported by funding from ERC-2011-294576 Advanced grant, Swedish Cancer Society, Swedish Research Council, Local hospital funds, Berta Kamprad Foundation, Gunnar Nilsson. The MMHS study was supported by NIH grants CA97396, CA128931, CA116201, CA140286 and CA177150. MSKCC is supported by grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and Robert and Kate Niehaus Clinical Cancer Genetics Initiative. The work of MTLGEBCS was supported by the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the "CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer" program – grant # CRN-87521 and the Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade – grant # PSR-SIIRI-701. The NBHS was supported by NIH grant R01CA100374. Biological sample preparation was conducted the Survey and Biospecimen Shared Resource, which is supported by P30 CA68485. The Northern California Breast Cancer Family Registry (NC-BCFR) and Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry (OFBCR) were supported by grant UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute (USA). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the USA Government or the BCFR. The Carolina Breast Cancer Study was funded by Komen Foundation, the National Cancer Institute (P50 CA058223, U54 CA156733, U01 CA179715), and the North Carolina University Cancer Research Fund. The NHS was supported by NIH grants P01 CA87969, UM1 CA186107, and U19 CA148065. The NHS2 was supported by NIH grants UM1 CA176726 and U19 CA148065. The ORIGO study was supported by the Dutch Cancer Society (RUL 1997-1505) and the Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI-NL CP16). The PBCS was funded by Intramural Research Funds of the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA. Genotyping for PLCO was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, NCI, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. The PLCO is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and supported by contracts from the Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. The POSH study is funded by Cancer Research UK (grants C1275/A11699, C1275/C22524, C1275/A19187, C1275/A15956 and Breast Cancer Campaign 2010PR62, 2013PR044. PROCAS is funded from NIHR grant PGfAR 0707-10031. The RBCS was funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (DDHK 2004-3124, DDHK 2009-4318). SEARCH is funded by Cancer Research UK [C490/A10124, C490/A16561] and supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University of Cambridge. The University of Cambridge has received salary support for PDPP from the NHS in the East of England through the Clinical Academic Reserve. The Sister Study (SISTER) is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES044005 and Z01-ES049033). The Two Sister Study (2SISTER) was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES044005 and Z01-ES102245), and, also by a grant from Susan G. Komen for the Cure, grant FAS0703856. SKKDKFZS is supported by the DKFZ. The SMC is funded by the Swedish Cancer Foundation and the Swedish Research Council [grant 2017-00644 for the Swedish Infrastructure for Medical Population-based Life-course Environmental Research (SIMPLER)]. The SZBCS is financially supported under the program of Minister of Science and Higher Education "Regional Initiative of Excellence" in years 2019-2022, Grant No 002/RID/2018/19. The TNBCC was supported by: a Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA116201), a grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, a generous gift from the David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Family Foundation. The UCIBCS component of this research was supported by the NIH [CA58860, CA92044] and the Lon V Smith Foundation [LVS39420]. The UKBGS is funded by Breast Cancer Now and the Institute of Cancer Research (ICR), London. ICR acknowledges NHS funding to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. The UKOPS study was funded by The Eve Appeal (The Oak Foundation) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. The USRT Study was funded by Intramural Research Funds of the National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, USA. CIMBA CIMBA: The CIMBA data management and data analysis were supported by Cancer Research – UK grants C12292/A20861, C12292/A11174. ACA is a Cancer Research -UK Senior Cancer Research Fellow. GCT and ABS are NHMRC Research Fellows. The PERSPECTIVE project was supported by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Ministry of Economy, Science and Innovation through Genome Québec, and The Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation. BCFR: UM1 CA164920 from the National Cancer Institute. The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centers in the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government or the BCFR. BFBOCC: Lithuania (BFBOCC-LT): Research Council of Lithuania grant SEN-18/2015 and Nr. P-MIP-19-164. BIDMC: Breast Cancer Research Foundation. BMBSA: Cancer Association of South Africa (PI Elizabeth J. van Rensburg). CNIO: Spanish Ministry of Health PI16/00440 supported by FEDER funds, the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) SAF2014-57680-R and the Spanish Research Network on Rare diseases (CIBERER). COH-CCGCRN: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under grant number R25CA112486, and RC4CA153828 (PI: J. Weitzel) from the National Cancer Institute and the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. CONSIT TEAM: Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC; IG2014 no.15547) to P. Radice. Funds from Italian citizens who allocated the 5 × 1000 share of their tax payment in support of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, according to Italian laws (INT-Institutional strategic projects '5 × 1000') to S. Manoukian. UNIROMA1: Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC; grant no. 21389) to L. Ottini. DFKZ: German Cancer Research Center. EMBRACE: Cancer Research UK Grants C1287/A10118 and C1287/A11990. D. Gareth Evans and Fiona Lalloo are supported by an NIHR grant to the Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester (IS-BRC-1215-20007). The Investigators at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust are supported by an NIHR grant to the Biomedical Research Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. Ros Eeles and Elizabeth Bancroft are supported by Cancer Research UK Grant C5047/A8385. Ros Eeles is also supported by NIHR support to the Biomedical Research Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. FCCC: NIH/NCI grant P30-CA006927. The University of Kansas Cancer Center (P30 CA168524) and the Kansas Bioscience Authority Eminent Scholar Program. A.K.G. was funded by R0 1CA140323, R01 CA214545, and by the Chancellors Distinguished Chair in Biomedical Sciences Professorship. Ana Vega is supported by the Spanish Health Research Foundation, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), partially supported by FEDER funds through Research Activity Intensification Program (contract grant numbers: INT15/00070, INT16/00154, INT17/00133), and through Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enferemdades Raras CIBERER (ACCI 2016: ER17P1AC7112/2018); Autonomous Government of Galicia (Consolidation and structuring program: IN607B), and by the Fundación Mutua Madrileña (call 2018). GC-HBOC: German Cancer Aid (grant no 110837, Rita K. Schmutzler) and the European Regional Development Fund and Free State of Saxony, Germany (LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, project numbers 713-241202, 713-241202, 14505/2470, 14575/2470). GEMO: Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer; the Association "Le cancer du sein, parlons-en!" Award, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the "CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer" program, the French National Institute of Cancer (INCa) (grants AOR 01 082, 2013-1-BCB-01-ICH-1 and SHS-E-SP 18-015) and the Fondation ARC pour la recherche sur le cancer (grant PJA 20151203365). GEORGETOWN: the Survey, Recruitment and Biospecimen Shared Resource at Georgetown University (NIH/NCI grant P30-CA051008) and the Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research. HCSC: Spanish Ministry of Health PI15/00059, PI16/01292, and CB-161200301 CIBERONC from ISCIII (Spain), partially supported by European Regional Development FEDER funds. HEBCS: Helsinki University Hospital Research Fund, Academy of Finland (266528), the Finnish Cancer Society and the Sigrid Juselius Foundation. HEBON: the Dutch Cancer Society grants NKI1998-1854, NKI2004-3088, NKI2007-3756, the Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research grant NWO 91109024, the Pink Ribbon grants 110005 and 2014-187.WO76, the BBMRI grant NWO 184.021.007/CP46 and the Transcan grant JTC 2012 Cancer 12-054. HUNBOCS: Hungarian Research Grants KTIA-OTKA CK-80745 and NKFI_OTKA K-112228. HVH (University Hospital Vall d'Hebron) This work was supported by Spanish Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) funding, an initiative of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation partially supported by European Regional Development FEDER Funds: FIS PI12/02585 and PI15/00355. ICO: The authors would like to particularly acknowledge the support of the Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (organismo adscrito al Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) and "Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), una manera de hacer Europa" (PI10/01422, PI13/00285, PIE13/00022, PI15/00854, PI16/00563, P18/01029, and CIBERONC) and the Institut Català de la Salut and Autonomous Government of Catalonia (2009SGR290, 2014SGR338, 2017SGR449, and PERIS Project MedPerCan), and CERCA program. IHCC: PBZ_KBN_122/P05/2004. ILUH: Icelandic Association "Walking for Breast Cancer Research" and by the Landspitali University Hospital Research Fund. INHERIT: Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the "CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer" program – grant # CRN-87521 and the Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade – grant # PSR-SIIRI-701. IOVHBOCS: Ministero della Salute and "5 × 1000" Istituto Oncologico Veneto grant. IPOBCS: Liga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro. kConFab: The National Breast Cancer Foundation, and previously by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the Queensland Cancer Fund, the Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia, and the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia. MAYO: NIH grants CA116167, CA192393 and CA176785, an NCI Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA116201), and a grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. MCGILL: Jewish General Hospital Weekend to End Breast Cancer, Quebec Ministry of Economic Development, Innovation and Export Trade. Marc Tischkowitz is supported by the funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program (2007Y2013)/European Research Council (Grant No. 310018). MSKCC: the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, the Robert and Kate Niehaus Clinical Cancer Genetics Initiative, the Andrew Sabin Research Fund and a Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant (P30 CA008748). NCI: the Intramural Research Program of the US National Cancer Institute, NIH, and by support services contracts NO2-CP-11019-50, N02-CP-21013-63 and N02-CP-65504 with Westat, Inc, Rockville, MD. NNPIO: the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grants 17-54-12007, 17-00-00171 and 18-515-45012). NRG Oncology: U10 CA180868, NRG SDMC grant U10 CA180822, NRG Administrative Office and the NRG Tissue Bank (CA 27469), the NRG Statistical and Data Center (CA 37517) and the Intramural Research Program, NCI. OSUCCG: was funded by the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. PBCS: Italian Association of Cancer Research (AIRC) [IG 2013 N.14477] and Tuscany Institute for Tumors (ITT) grant 2014-2015-2016. SMC: the Israeli Cancer Association. SWE-BRCA: the Swedish Cancer Society. UCHICAGO: NCI Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA125183), R01 CA142996, 1U01CA161032 and by the Ralph and Marion Falk Medical Research Trust, the Entertainment Industry Fund National Women's Cancer Research Alliance and the Breast Cancer research Foundation. UCSF: UCSF Cancer Risk Program and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center. UKFOCR: Cancer Researc h UK. UPENN: National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01-CA102776 and R01-CA083855; Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Susan G. Komen Foundation for the cure, Basser Research Center for BRCA. UPITT/MWH: Hackers for Hope Pittsburgh. VFCTG: Victorian Cancer Agency, Cancer Australia, National Breast Cancer Foundation. WCP: Dr Karlan is funded by the American Cancer Society Early Detection Professorship (SIOP-06-258-01-COUN) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Grant UL1TR000124. ; Peer Reviewed
This Report documents the presentations given at the World's first international conference on the management value of the resource knowledge of small scale, indigenous and commercial fishers. The conference was inspired by Dr Robert (Bob) Johannes, whose 1981 Book 'Words of the Lagoon', was the first serious study in this area, and was co-hosted by the UBC Fisheries Centre, UBC First Nations House of Learning and the BC Aboriginal Fisheries Commission. Over 200 people representing 23 countries and 36 North American First Nation representatives attended. The conference sought to provide a way to 'step beyond' fishers' frustration that their knowledge is ignored and scientists' standard position that the knowledge is anecdotal, and can not easily be captured in the reports, tables and graphs they are used to. In total, 48 papers and 26 abstracts of papers were presented during the three days of the conference. These case studies and presentations included Indigenous, Artisanal, small scale and industrial marine and freshwater fisheries in tropical and temperate environments. Species range from turtles and dugongs, through temperate trawl and tropical multi-species fisheries to the aquarium trade. The conference followed themes relating to the use of fishers' ecological knowledge about fishing practices in environmental management; the relationships between fishers' expertise (knowledge) and management; methodological issues/methods for obtaining and accurately representing fishers' knowledge; the ethical issues relating to collaboration between TEK practitioners, managers, academics and industry; and the valuation of fishers' knowledge from an ecological, economic and social approach. DIRECTOR'S FOREWORD -- CONTRIBUTED PAPERS -- MY GRANDFATHER'S KNOWLEDGE: FIRST NATIONS FISHING METHODOLOGIES IN THE MID FRASER RIVER (Arnie Narcisse) -- A NATIVE CHANT Simon Lucas -- FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE AND MANAGEMENT: DIFFERING FUNDAMENTALS IN ARTISANAL AND INDUSTRIAL FISHERIES (R.E. Johannes) -- THE ROLE OF FISHERS KNOWLEDGE IN IMPLEMENTING OCEAN ACT INITIATIVES IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR (A. S. Power and Dawn) Mercer) -- CLOSING THE LOOP: COMMERCIAL FISH HARVESTERS' LOCAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENCE IN A STUDY OF COASTAL COD IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR, CANADA (Karen Gosse, Joe Wroblewski and Barbara Neis) -- APPLYING LOCAL AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SUSTAINABLE FISHERY: THE CURRENT WEST COAST VANCOUVER ISLAND GOOSE BARNACLE FISHERY EXPERIENCE (Joanne Lessard , Josie Osborne, Ray Lauzier, Glen Jamieson and Rick Harbo) -- PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH IN THE BRITISH COLUMBIA GROUNDFISH FISHERY. (Richard D. Stanley and J. Rice) -- THE DISCOURSE OF PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY IN MARINE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT (Heidi Glaesel and Mark Simonitsch) -- THE ROLE OF INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE IN DEPLETING A LIMITED RESOURCE – A CASE STUDY OF THE BUMPHEAD PARROTFISH (BOLBOMETOPON MURICATUM) ARTISANAL FISHERY IN ROVIANA LAGOON, WESTERN PROVINCE, SOLOMON ISLANDS (Richard Hamilton) -- USING FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE GOES BEYOND FILLING GAPS IN SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE – ANALYSIS OF AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCES (Pascale Baelde) -- LOCAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AND SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT IN THE MEKONG RIVER IN SOUTHERN LAOS(Ian Baird) -- SCIAENID AGGREGATIONS IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA: AN EXAMPLE OF SUCCESSFUL OUTCOMES THROUGH COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH. (M.J. Phelan) -- STATUS OF RESEARCH ON INDIGENOUS FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE IN AUSTRALIA AND BRAZIL (Adam Faulkner and Renato A. M. Silvano) -- TRADITIONAL MARINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN VANUATU – SACRED & PROFANE: WORLD VIEWS IN TRANSFORMATION (Francis Hickey) ACCOUNTING FOR THE IMPACTS OF FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE AND NORMS ON ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY (Murray A. Rudd) -- THE USE OF FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF FISH RESOURCES IN MALAWI(Edward Nsiku) -- EXAMINING THE TWO CULTURES THEORY OF FISHERIES KNOWLEDGE: THE CASE OF THE NORTHWEST ATLANTIC BLUEFISH (Douglas Wilson) THE VALUE OF LOCAL KNOWLEDGE IN SEA TURTLE CONSERVATION: A CASE FROM BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO (Kristin E. Bird, Wallace J. Nichols and Charles R. Tambiah) -- PUTTING FISHERMEN'S KNOWLEDGE TO WORK: THE PROMISE AND PITFALLS (Ted Ames) -- USING EXPERT KNOWLEDGE TO IDENTIFY POSSIBLE GROUNDFISH 'ESSENTIAL FISH HABITATS' (Melanie Bergmann, B. Hinz, R. Blyth, M.J. Kaiser, S.I. Rogers and M. Armstrong) -- INTEGRATION OF FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE INTO RESEARCH ON A LARGE TROPICAL RIVER BASIN, THE MEKONG RIVER IN SOUTHEAST ASIA (Anders F. Poulsen) -- FISHERS' PERCEPTIONS ON THE SEAHORSE FISHERY IN CENTRAL PHILIPPINES: INTERACTIVE APPROACHES AND AN EVALUATION OF RESULTS (J. Meeuwig, M.A. Samoilys and J. Erediano) -- FOCUSING AND TESTING FISHER KNOW-HOW TO SOLVE CONSERVATION PROBLEMS (Edward F. Melvin and Julia K Parrish) -- BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT USING KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION [ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE] (Antonio García-Allut, Juan Freire, Alvaro Barreiro and David E. Losada) -- INTEGRATING FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE WITH SURVEY DATA TO UNDERSTAND THE STRUCTURE, ECOLOGY AND USE OF A SEASCAPE OFF SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA (Alan Williams and Nic Bax) -- 'SUSTAINABILITY VECTORS' AS GUIDES IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT: WITH EXAMPLES FROM NET FISHERIES IN THE PHILIPPINES AND AUSTRALIA (Michael D Pido, Peter Valentine and Mark Fenton) -- FISHERS AND SCIENTISTS: NO LONGER FOE, BUT NOT YET FRIEND (Melanie D. Power and Ratana Chuenpagdee) -- HARVESTING AN INLAND SEA: FOLK HISTORY, TEK AND THE CLAIMS OF LAKE MICHIGAN'S COMMERCIAL FISHERY (Michael Chiarappa) -- CAN HISTORICAL NAMES & FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE HELP TO RECONSTRUCT LAKES? (Johan Spens) -- EXPLORING CULTURAL CONSTRUCTS: THE CASE OF SEA MULLET MANAGEMENT IN MORETON BAY, SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA (Tanuja Barker and Annie Ross) -- WHO'S LISTENING? ISLANDER KNOWLEDGE IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT IN TORRES STRAIT, NORTHERN AUSTRALIA (Monica E. Mulrennan) -- A COLLABORATIVE, CONSULTATIVE AND COMMITTED APPROACH TO EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF DUGONGS IN TORRES STRAIT, QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA. (Donna Kwan) -- FISHING FOR ANSWERS: THE INCORPORATION OF INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE IN NORTHERN AUSTRALIA: DEVELOPING CROSS CULTURAL LITERACY (Melissa Nursey-Bray) THE USE OF TRADITIONAL HAWAIIAN KNOWLEDGE IN THE CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF MARINE RESOURCES(Kelson "Mac" Poepoe, Paul K. Bartram and Alan M. Friedlander) -- TWO FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS AND FRONTIER STRATEGIES IN THE PHILIPPINES (Maria F. Mangahas) -- HOW SASI PRACTICES MAKE FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE EFFECTIVE (Agus Heri Purnomo) -- HOW LOCAL FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE IMPROVES THE MANAGEMENT OF FISHERIES IN NEW ZEALAND – A SEAFOOD INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE (G.J. Lydon and A. Langley) -- HISTORICAL AND CURRENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE GREENLAND HALIBUT FROM QUÉBEC FIXED-GEAR FISHERS IN THE GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE (Réjeanne Camirand, Bernard Morin and Louise Savard) -- MARINE RESOURCE KNOWLEDGE RELATED TO FISH CLASSIFICATION IN HAÏTI (Jean W. Wiener) PLATEAU FISHING TECHNOLOGY AND ACTIVITY: STL'ATL'IMX, SECWEPEMC AND NLAKA'PAMUX KNOWLEDGE (Nicholette Prince) -- KAT (AMERICAN EEL, ANGUILLA ROSTRATA) LIFE HISTORY (Kerry Prosper and Mary Jane Paulette) -- THE BARE-FOOT ECOLOGIST'S TOOLBOX (Jeremy D. Prince) -- AN EXAMPLE OF CONSERVATION AND EXPLOITATION ACHIEVED THROUGH A VOLUNTARY FISHERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (Robert E. Blyth, Michel J. Kaiser , Paul J.B. Hart and Gareth Edwards-Jones) -- INTEGRATING SCIENTIFIC AND LOCAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE (LEK) IN STUDIES OF COMMON EIDERS IN SOUTHERN LABRADOR, CANADA (Heather Chaffey) -- HOW FISHERS' ENDEAVORS AND INFORMATION HELP IN MANAGING THE FISHERIES RESOURCES OF THE SUNDARBAN MANGROVE FOREST OF BANGLADESH (Md. Emdadul Haque) -- WHAT'S IN THERE: COMMON NAMES OF BRAZILIAN MARINE FISHES (Kátia M. F. Freire and Daniel Pauly) -- THE ROLE OF FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE IN CO-MANAGEMENT OF ARTISANAL FISHERIES IN THE ESTUARY OF PATOS LAGOON, SOUTHERN BRAZIL (Daniela Kalikoski, Marcelo Vasconcellos) -- COGNITIVE MAPS: CARTOGRAPHY AND CONCEPTS FOR BACK TO THE FUTURE FISHERIES POLICY (Tony J. Pitcher and Nigel Haggan) -- PAPERS IN ABSTRACT: ORALLY PRESENTED CHANGES IN TECHNOLOGIES, MARKET CONDITIONS, AND SOCIAL RELATIONS: THEIR LINKAGES WITH FISHERS TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE (NEW BRUNSWICK'S INSHORE FISHING FLEET IN THE SOUTHERN GULF OF ST.LAWRENCE). (Omer Chouinard and Jean-Paul Vanderlinden) -- FISHING AT KOMODAH, KITKATLA TERRITORY: RETURNING TO SELECTIVITY (Charles R. Menzies and Caroline F.) -- (Butler) -- THE LEADERSHIP ROLE OF CALIFORNIA FISHING MEN AND WOMEN: PROMOTING SCIENCE IN FISHERIES POLICY AND FISH RECOVERY (Natasha Benjamin, Paul Siri and Zeke Grader) -- INCORPORATING INDIGENOUS INTERESTS AND KNOWLEDGE INTO MANAGEMENT OF THE GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK (M.L. Sommer and L. O. Rosendale) -- USING FISHERS TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE TO IDENTIFY PRIORITY AREAS FOR CONSERVATION IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN (Lance Morgan) -- THE NOVA SCOTIA LEATHERBACK TURTLE WORKING GROUP: A MODEL FOR SUCCESSFUL COLLABORATION BETWEEN FISHERS AND SCIENTISTS (Michael C. James and Kathleen E. Martin…) -- TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE IN OCEAN AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT: A SURVEY OF RECENT EXPERIENCE IN ATLANTIC CANADA (Paul Macnab and Denise McCullough) -- THE TULALIP TRIBE'S CULTURAL STORIES PROJECT: RECORDING AND USING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE FOR CULTURAL LANDSCAPE RECOVERY, WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AND SALMON PROTECTION (Terry Williams, Julia Gold and Preston Hardison) -- Putting Fishers' Knowledge to Work: Conference Proceedings -- ENVIRONMENTAL SENTINELS: REFRAMING COMMERCIAL FISHING IN PURSUIT OF VALUE, INTEGRITY AND SUSTAINABILITY (Bryan Price) -- DEVELOPING A SET OF INDICATORS FOR EVALUATING THE CONDITION OF A RESOURCE -- CASE: FRESHWATER FISHERIES IN LAOS PDR. (Niels Jepsen, Douglas Wilson & Sommano Phounsavath) -- A METHOD TO ESTIMATE THE ABUNDANCE OF ARAPAIMA GIGAS (CUVIER 1817) -- (Leandro Castello) -- USING FISHERS' KNOWLEDGE TO EVALUATE GREAT LAKES FISHERY MANAGEMENT POLICY (Tracy A. Dobson and Laura F. Cimo) -- THE FISHERMEN AND SCIENTISTS RESEARCH SOCIETY: COLLABORATIVE IMPROVEMENT OF THE KNOWLEDGE BASE FOR MODERN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT (Kees C.T. Zwanenburg1, P. Fanning, P. Hurley and W.T. Stobo) -- FISHERIES IN THE GALÁPAGOS ISLANDS: THE PARTICIPATION OF FISHERS IN FISHERY MANAGEMENT (E. Espinoza, J.C. Murillo, M.V.Toral, R.H. Bustamante, F. Nicolaides, G.J. Edgar, J. Moreno, C. Chasiluisa, M. Yépez, J.C. Barreno, S. A. Shepherd, J. Viscaino, M. Villalta, R. Andrade, A.F. Born, L. Figueroa, P. Guerrero, M. Piu) -- HOW CAN WE HAVE MORE PARTICIPATION BY THE FISHERMEN IN FISHERIES SCIENCE? (Virginia Boudreau) -- THE LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INCORPORATING INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE INTO FISHERIES MANAGEMENT (Terry Williams and Preston Hardison) -- FISHING IN MURKY WATERS: ETHICS AND POLITICS OF RESEARCH ON FISHER KNOWLEDGE (Anita Maurstad) -- BUILDING NETWORKS FOR INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (Preston Hardison) -- SOCIAL RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES (Christie Dyer and Jessica Paterson) -- ICONS: A SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR INTEGRATING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (Preston Hardison and Terry Williams) ASSEMBLY OF MAP-BASED STREAM NARRATIVES TO FACILITATE STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT (M.R.S. Johannes, K.D. Hyatt, J.K. Cleland, L.Hanslit, and M.M. Stockwell) -- MIGRATION PATTERNS AND SPAWNING HABITS OF AN IMPORTANT FISH, HELIGOPHAGUS WAANDERSI, OF THE PANGASIIDAE FAMILY IN THE MEKONG RIVER BASIN (Sintavong Viravong) -- INSHORE GROUNDFSH SPAWNING AND NURSERY GROUNDS IN THE BAY OF FUNDY: LEARNING WITH AND FROM FISHERMEN (Jennifer Graham) -- THE CONTRIBUTION OF FISHERS TO THE MANAGEMENT OF SEA-URCHIN FISHERIES IN BARBADOS AND ST. LUCIA (Christopher Parker, Patrick McConney and Allan Smith) -- GENERAL DISCUSSION -- LIST OF AUTHORS -- LIST OF PARTICIPANTS ; Fisheries Centre (FC) ; Non UBC ; Unreviewed ; Faculty ; Researcher ; Postdoctoral ; Graduate
Full TextThe Barn Owl The Barn Owl (Tyto alba) is a medium-sized, tawny coloured owl that, with the exception of Antarctica, has worldwide distribution. Like most owls the Barn Owl is considered to be nocturnal. Like all owls, it is predatory bird. In the Barn Owl's case, members of the species are said to enjoy (or specialize, in the biological parlance) in small ground mammals—rodents, for example. In Eastern North America, the majority of their diet would include Meadow Voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Barn Owls strike a distinct-look with their lack of ear tufts (a misnomer of sorts as the tufts—the "horns" of a Great Horned Owl, Bubo virginianus—are not ears and not associated with hearing at all) and their distinct heart-shaped facial disc (which is associated with hearing, but that's another story for another time). As their common name suggests they can be found living in barns, on a nest made from the regurgitated un-digestible remains of those Meadow Voles and Deer Mice they hunt. Of course Barn Owls are not just limited to barns, but nest in silos, abandoned buildings and tree cavities too. Arguably, this should make their name "Barn, Silo, Abandoned Building & Tree Cavity Owl" but that doesn't really roll off the tongue in the same way. These attributes and distinguishing features are all things to keep in mind if you find yourself out birdwatching near a barn in Southern Ontario. During your explorations, while there are certain to be Rock Pigeons (Columba livia) fluttering about, if you happen to come across a Barn Owl in this setting, you should take notice. Seeing a Barn Owl in Southern Ontario (especially a living Barn Owl) is something to make special note of—it's not a regular occurrence. Part of the significance of seeing a Barn Owl lies in its relative in-abundance. While individuals identified as Tyto alba enjoy a cosmopolitan reputation, Southern Ontario has been considered the northern range of the species ("Ontario Barn Own Recovery Project," 2005) and it has been suggested that Barn Owls have always found, say, other places more to their liking. Because of this, the Barn Owl is a special bird in Canada: it is officially endangered, recognized by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) ("Ontario Barn Own Recovery Project," 2005). It seems as though Barn Owls living in Ontario have had bad luck of late— of the "handful" ("Ontario Barn Own Recovery Project," 2005 ¶ 4) that have been seen since 1999, two were roadkills ("Ontario Barn Own Recovery Project," 2005) and no breeding pairs have been "confirmed." The Barn Owl of February 27th 2006 If you are a serious birder in Ontario, with a computer and internet access, it is likely that you are aware of the electronic mailing list called Ontbirds. Ontbirds is presented by the self-proclaimed provincial birding association, the Ontario Field Ornithologists. The electronic mailing list (or listserv) is meant to be a clearing-house of bird sightings and directions for interested birders: you read about a bird you would like to see, get the directions and off you go on a (perhaps literal) wild goose chase. On average, four to seven sightings are posted daily. As might be expected, more posting occurs on the weekend, and more postings occur seasonally during spring and fall migration. Typical emails follow a standard form: the subject line contains the bird or birds seen and their location while the body of the email contains more specific information about the birds and precise directions to the location they might be found. While thorough, the information shared is, generally speaking, pretty uncontentious stuff. So, it was with interest that a seemingly normal post on February 28th, 2006 took on new dimensions: whispers of deception, accusation of fraud and, more interestingly for my work, questions of what is normal, known and natural all emerged. On February 28th, 2006, a simple posting appeared in mailboxes of subscribers outlining how a photograph had been taken of a Barn Owl and posted on a webbased photography site. A URL was given linking to the photograph. It was noted that the photographer had not reported seeing the bird on the Ontbirds listserv, but that there was a link to the location where the bird was seen. That same day, the moderator of the listserv posted reminding the subscribers that the Barn Owl was considered "endangered" on breeding territory and that there were rules about posting about endangered birds on the listserv; all of the requirements that needed to be met prior to posting were created in order to reduce the likelihood that an observed bird would abandon a nest or breeding attempt. The following day, March 1st, a conversation had begun via the listserv. Another respondent was interested in knowing more details about the sighting and if the bird had been seen again. The next email later that day was from the photographer himself. In the email, he explained that though he did not remember exactly where he saw the bird, he used Google maps to locate the general location and road names. According to his directions, the Barn Owl was seen in Eastern Ontario, in the Ottawa region. As well, he shared the story of finding the owl, taking the photograph and watching the bird fly away from him. The author also stated that his initial reason for going out birding that day was to find Snowy Owls to photograph and that he had no luck in finding those birds that day. On March 2nd, another email arrived from another Ontbirds subscriber. In it, the author began to question the authenticity of the photograph. This email suggested that the owl's feet have been "doctored," as though something was removed after the photograph had been taken. The author reminded those reading that the Barn Owl is rare for Ontario and especially so where the photograph was taken—the implication being that the bird is so rare that it most likely didn't exist. A third email followed on March 2nd in which the author suggests that there is nothing in the photograph that appears unusual or doctored. The author offered another suggestion about the authenticity of the owl. He reminded us that there was a Barn Owl sighting in a different part of Ontario earlier in the winter and attributes the owl's presence not to digital photographic magic, but to efforts undertaken on the part of humans to help the species recover. Yet, this claim to reality does not seem to be working. Later in the afternoon on March 2nd, a fourth email arrived that supports the initial hypothesis that the photograph has been doctored. The author shared that the bird looks like one he had seen at Parc Omega, a wildlife park in Québec, and provides a URL to a photograph of the Parc Omega Barn Owl. The pull of the network to make the photograph unauthentic, and in turn, the owl, continues to mount. In a fifth email, the author shared the contention that the fencepost the Barn Owl is pictured perching on was specially made for captive birds to land on. The author also suggested that given the lighting of the photograph and kind of weather that was observed on the day that the photograph was supposed to have been taken, the photograph could not be discounted as being genuine. This is where the conversation ends on Ontbirds. At 5:30 pm on March 2nd, the listserv co-ordinator posted a message that states that the current conversation on the photographed Barn Owl is inappropriate. The coordinator reminded readers that Ontbirds is not a discussion list and is for "reporting birds period." The closing line in the email reminds readers that not following the guidelines could result in the restriction or loss of being able to post to the listerv. This does not mean, however, that the conversation ended. In following the network thread to a website that catalogues rare birds from the Ottawa area, the sighting details for the Barn Owl seen on February 27th is prefaced with the words "LIKELY HOAX." The page author outlines a litany of evidence that supports his claim that the image has been manipulated. The webpage author concludes his outline with the statement "let the viewer beware." Enacting birds: reflection on the Barn Owl of February 27th I have spent some time thinking about the birders and the Barn Owl. I have read and reflected on the emails and the allegations. From this, themes have emerged concerning the construction of what is natural as well as insights into the creation of what Donna Haraway (2003) calls "naturecultures." Most importantly, this event, be it framed as authentic bird sighting or elaborate hoax, helps enact and make visible a topology of inter-species ethical relations between those who watch birds and the birds they watch. Networks Ontbirds operates within an established network of relations. People post their sightings to share with other interested birders. The process through which experiences are transcribed from embodied encounters to textual references is seemingly an invisible one. In this case, there were visible deviations from the established network. Within the birding community that posts to Ontbirds, the claim to have "found" a bird is an important one. In posts where the author is reporting a first-sighting and they did not find the bird themselves, the name of the bird finder (skilled, lucky or otherwise, as it is never suggested the kind of effort it took to come across the bird) is included. In this example, the finder did not make a submission to Ontbirds to report a rare bird. Rather, it seems like in this case, the original post came via an on-line gallery created by the finder that had the photograph and birding information on it. While never overtly stated, I believe that the authenticity of the Barn Owl was partially called into question due to the fact that the finder of the bird did not post his sighting to the listserv. Additionally, I find interesting to note that in the finder's one email to the Ontbirds listserv, he did his best to fit into the established network. However, problematic for him, he was not familiar with the area where he took the photograph. Part of the established Ontbirds network is knowing where you observed a bird; the more detailed the description of location and directions, the better. In networks, effort is required to maintain the relationships of the actors. The listserv tends to operate with little of what I would call boundary policing on the part of the co-ordinator. What is particularly interesting about the Barn Owl postings was the need of the Ontbirds co-ordinator to make comments concerning the type and quality of postings over the three day period, all referencing the mail about the Barn Owl. In well-established networks, subtle deviations from the established routine lead to powerful reactions: networks tend to become visible when they are threatened. The questioning of the authenticity seems to be such a reaction. What this suggests for a birding network is the power that lies in the focus on names, dates and details. This hybridity that exists between birders and the electronic mailing list certainly has implications in shaping what is considered normal, known and natural for those who subscribe to the list. Birds are enacted through Ontbirds as realities "out there" to be discovered, recorded and reported. While this is not necessarily that surprising, it does, in turn have an impact on other enactments of birds, especially visible in the multiple objects created. Multiple objects In this case there was an exceeding focus by birders on the rarity of the bird, to the point where I believe that the Barn Owl became a multiple object. Emerging from the field of Science and Technology studies, the idea of multiple objects opens a different way to think about the taken-for-granted: objects are often thought of as rigid and immobile in their existence - a Barn Owl will always be a Barn Owl (for a detailed discussion of multiple objects, see Law, 2004; Mol, 2002). In response to this, a multiple version of the object counters this notion of singularity. In focusing on the fractal nature of "reality" and in attending to difference, I believe that this perspective requires attention be paid to the enactment of objects. Enactment, in this sense, is the claim that "relations, and so realities and representations of realities.are being endlessly or chronically brought into being in a continuing process of production and reproduction, and have no status, standing or reality outside those processes" (Law, 2004, p. 159). Enactment is different than constructivism as it does not "imply convergence to singularity," in opposition to the fixing of objects' identities, "but takes difference and multiplicity to be chronic conditions" (Law, 2004, p. 158). Difference suggests that multiple versions of the same object can exist simultaneouslythis occurs because while objects are enacted in practice, these practices can be different. If the practices are different, then so too must be the objects (Law, 2004). Yet these multiple versions-or multiple objectsare, more often than not, able to cohere together. So, if these coherences shape our reality, then reality: is not in principal fixed or singular, and truth is no longer the only ground for accepting or rejecting a representation. The implication is that there are various possible reasons, including the political, for enacting one kind of reality rather than another, and that these grounds can in some measure be debated. (Law, 2004, p. 162) As such, a focus on the enactment of objects is filled with attention to the many ways that actors, human and otherwise, engage to create a reality: a reality described through investigation, a reality that is not the only one "out there" and a reality that focuses on heterogeneity and difference. In the move to collapse multiple realities into one, a distinctly political move is made, where one reality, one particular enactment of an object gains primacy over the others. In this particular becoming of the Barn Owl, the enactment of rarity overshadowed the other ways the bird was known (see Figure 1). Rather than having to pass judgement on if I think the Barn Owl was properly enacted, I think it is more valuable to examine the ways the bird was enacted. Let me outline the different ways (that I can see): - as a rare bird species (through the Ontbirds coordinator, external web pages and some birders' previous knowledge) - as a biological reality (through the email that suggested the Owl was a result of species rebound and human conservation efforts) - as digital magic (many of the claims to digital alteration of the photograph enacted this Barn Owl) - as an Eastern Ontario Barn Owl (through the initial posting) - as an Québec Barn Owl (through the claims it came from Parc Omega) There have also been subtle and tacit ways that the authenticity has been enacted, framed through the network of discovery, recording and reporting previously described. Through these discourses, the Barn Owl has been enacted as a: - valuable, wild bird - feral bird of ambivalent worth - wildlife park captive and therefore does not count In this multiplicity, the Barn Owl lost value in the eyes of some birders as its authenticity was called into question. What is implicit in this questioning is the understanding that there is some kind of a continuum that reported birds are judged against. It seems that the gold standard of authenticity is one that is wild, rare and (relatively) easy to find. It goes without saying that this perspective is not entirely unproblematic. This, in part, helps explain why there are not any postings to Ontbirds describing a flock of Pigeons seen in a ubiquitous habitat, such as the urbanized core of Anytown, Ontario. A Pigeon simply does not match up to the gold standard of valuable birds. In deciding what gets to "count" in knowledge-making endeavours, and what counts as the gold standard, other birds disappear from what is noticed. In that disappearance, the bird moves to the hinterland. I turn to that next. The hinterland and otherness Hinterland's are an attempt to engage with the act of disappearing. Law puts forward three kinds of Hinterland's: the first, he suggest are "in-here objects" (Law, 2004, p. 55); the second are "visible or relevant out-there contexts" (Law, 2004, p. 55); and the third are "out-there processes, contexts, and all the rest, that are both necessary and necessarily disappear from visibility or relevance" (Law, 2004, p. 55). I would deploy an artistic metaphor of positive space and negative space here: that which is present is the positive space of an image and that which is absent is negative space of an image. It is often difficult to decide if it is the negative or positive space that bounds the image: each side depends on the other such that if one is not there, the known image would disappear. Perhaps, if I expand the metaphor, the hidden absent is that which is not within the frame of the image. Importantly, all that lies outside the frame, while unnecessary in the composition of the image, is only unnecessary because it has been selectively ignored in the composition of the image. Emerging from this perspective on the hinterland is the acknowledgement that a relationship with the unknown, or the other, is necessary; rather than simply ignoring the disappearance, it is an attempt to acknowledge that disappearance is integral to any kind of knowing. Thus, if birding, as an act, continues the "process [of] enacting necessary boundaries between presence, manifest absence and Otherness" (Law, 2004, p. 144), then the various activities taken up in the name of coming to know these organisms are each a distinctly political move, moves that shape and reaffirm (mostly conventional) ways of knowing the nonhuman. For example, the second post in this chain made explicit that the individual Barn Owl was, in fact, part of larger species, Tyto alba and that species was considered to be an endangered one. The term endangered species does just that: focus on species, at the expense of the individual. In this organism's identification as a member of a species, it loses any ability to be something else; what could be has been othered. This act of othering is at times common in birdwatching. It occurs more than once in the Barn Owl discussion: through the questioning about the validity of the sighting, the focus subtly shifts from the sighting to determining the authenticity of the photograph. Again, in this move the individual owl disappears. The Barn Owl was not the only member of the order Aves to be othered in this particular natureculture assemblage. It is also interesting to note that the Snowy Owls, the birds that were the original objective of the outing that produced the Barn Owl, have disappeared. Likely, there were other birds seen during that trip, but for whatever reason (perhaps not rare, not big, not charismatic), they were ignored. For my purposes, I consider this othering problematic, in part, because it does little to acknowledge the lived experiences of nonhuman individuals. The challenge here is that the act of othering, in and of itself, is not inherently wrong. Rather than focusing on what might be out there, I believe that it is important to be able to recognize enactments that are politically aligned with the kind of relationships that ought to exist. So, one needs to develop the skill of attending to what is observably cast to the hinterland and what is brought to the forefront. In a sense, this is what I've attempted to do with my analysis of the Barn Owl narrative and the creation of the enacted set of relations in Figure 1. In creating this particular map of relations, I attempt to move beyond the established frame and re-focus on those multiple enactments that have been cast aside. In so doing, political actions and entrenched positions are more easily visible, while others can re-emerge from obscurity. It is true that there might be other unknowable enactments that exist in the hinterland-but let me suggest that acknowledging that, at best, partial perspectives (Haraway, 1991) are our best version of reality (as a nod to multiplicity does) offers more space for other realities to emerge. Thinking more generally about our dominant cultural relationship with the nonhuman, the promise of attentiveness to the various enactments of animals offer the opportunity to intentionally enact a reality that is more in line with one's own ethics. In asking what practices of birding are good or which practices ought we to be enacting, attention can be turned to current enactments to ask: "Ought they be enacted in this way?" This simple question, paired with the knowledge that there are other enactments hidden, could be enough to continue to question some of our Western culture's taken-forgranted assumptions about what it is to be human and otherwise. References Haraway, D. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: the reinvention of nature (pp. 183-202). Routledge: New York. Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press. Law, J. (2004). After method: mess in social science research. London: Routledge. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press. Ontario Barn Own Recovery Project. (2005, February 7). Retrieved March 4, 2006, from http://www.bsc-eoc.org/regional/barnowl.html
