Suchergebnisse

Unpacking porn: race, sexuality, and masculinity -- The insolubility of Black and queer -- Porn, past and present -- Identity, power, and performativity -- Dark phalluses: preoccupation and dismemberment -- Missing links: primitiveness and primality -- Separate spaces: bifurcation and essentialism -- Can the subaltern fuck?

This article describes the abolition and dismemberment of London's metropolitan authority, the Greater London Council (GLC). It explains how the functions of the GLC were partitioned between successors, with particular reference to the role of the London Residuary Body. The article highlights the contribution of GLC officers and management structures to the residuary process, and the paradoxical part played by County Hall, the one undisposed relic of the GLC empire. The GLC also left behind it a second, less tangible legacy — its territorial footprint. The article contrasts the successful administrative dismemberment of the GLC with the rising sense of political identity within its boundaries. It suggests that a paradoxical effect of abolition has been to lay for the first time the basis of political community within the single physical metropolis of London.

Front Cover -- Half Title -- Series Information -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Foreword to the Spanish Edition -- Prologue -- Acknowledgements -- Notes on Contributors -- Introduction to the English Version -- Chapter 1 The Destruction of Criminal Law -- 1 The Tortuous Path of Criminal Law -- 2 The "Founding Fathers" of Good Criminal Law -- 3 The Positive Function of Criminal Law -- 4 Forgetting the "Founding Fathers" -- 5 The Dismemberment of Criminal Law -- 6 Conditions for the Creation of "Shameful Criminal Law:" The Great Swindle -- 7 Dismemberment, Decapitation and Recomposition of Criminal Law -- 8 The Current Conditions for the Construction of "Shameful" Criminal Law -- 9 The "Decapitated" Version of Today's "Shameful" Criminal Law -- 10 The Tendency of Dismembered "Shameful" Criminal Law to Sink to the Bottom -- 11 The Consequences of Lawfare's Dismemberment of Criminal Law -- 12 Weaknesses Attributable to Legislators, Jurists, and Judges Outside of "Lawfare" -- 13 "Lawfare" Crimes -- 14 Would it Not Be Prudent to Prevent "Lawfare"? -- Chapter 2 The Destruction of Law of Criminal Procedure -- 1 The Impact of the Political Media Usage of Law of Criminal Procedure in Argentina -- 2 Jurisdiction and Due Process -- 3 The Difficult Road to Judicial Impartiality -- 4 The Informant -- 5 The Magical Realism of the Informant -- 6 The Systematic Violation of Constitutional Guarantees -- 7 Lies Instead of Proof -- 8 Wiretapping and Other Coercive Measures of Shameful Law of Criminal Procedure -- 9 Wiretapping -- 10 The Eavesdropping Continues -- 11 The Unconstitutional Interception of Communications -- 12 The (Ab)use of Pretrial Detention -- 13 On Delegitimization and Pretrial Detention -- 14 Violating the Rules of Pretrial Detention -- 15 Prison Punishments -- Chapter 3 The Destruction of Criminology.

Cover -- Title -- Copyright -- CONTENTS -- Acknowledgments -- INTRODUCTION -- CHAPTER 1 Banishment -- CHAPTER 2 Federal Power and Citizenship in Indian Country -- CHAPTER 3 A New Deal for Native Citizenship -- CHAPTER 4 Native Self-Determination -- CHAPTER 5 The Dismembering Explodes -- CHAPTER 6 Judicial Interpretations of Dismemberment -- CONCLUSION -- Appendix -- List of Interviews -- Notes -- Selected Bibliography -- Index

This paper analyzes the international determinants that led to and triggered the Bosnian War in the 1990s. An overview of the Socialist Yugoslavia and its international stance up to its dismemberment is presented at first, focusing on the integration of the country in the international system (and its impact on Yugoslavia) and on its international economic status. Then, the onset of the war and the actions of the Great Powers — United States, France, Germany, United Kingdom, and Russia — are analyzed, looking at the undermining of the Yugoslav state's sovereignty and the empowerment of domestic actors through external support to belligerent groups. It is seen that after Yugoslavia's economic destabilization, foreign interference propelled the start of the war by making the belligerent groups in Bosnia confident because of their foreign support. Geopolitical interests were a determinant of the Bosnian War, which was characterized as an intractable ethnic conflict to hide political agendas at play.Keywords: Bosnian War; Yugoslavia; Post-Cold War geopolitics; Dismemberment of Yugoslavia; Great power politics; Ethnic conflict.

States as international persons — State succession — Continuity of the law — Dismemberment of States — Transfer of obligations from parent to successor State by agreement — Evian Agreements and Algerian accession to independence — Responsibility to compensate for injuries to civilians by French forces prior to independence — Whether France or Algeria liable — The law of France.

John Hibbs described in the last JEA the dangers awaiting London's transport system if it were exposed to further political manipulation. From his analysis of the transport difficulties besetting New York, James Ramsey outlines the measures by which Tom King. Transport Secretary, can use privatisation to help whatever transport administration survives the dismemberment of the GLC.

The concept of constitution substitution is a notion that has not been developed by constituent power, and in that measure, the Colombian Constitutional Court has established a precedent for the amendment process of the Legislative Act, which is performed by congress in order to limit the power of constituted power. In spite the fact that the Court has stated that there are no clauses written in stone, it has forged some fundamental principles and consolidated the defining axes, is what resume the theory of substituting. However, constitutional amendments have some limits to what Richard Albert makes a reference and summarize in 4 fundamental characteristics, that should not exceed the constitutional scope. As was pointed out by Albert the power to amend is one above all that does not exceed the scope of what was intended in the constitution, but there may be an intermediate point which he calls dismemberment, which is more than an amendment but does not get to become a structural reform of the constitution. Let's see how Colombia's Constitution and the Constitutional Court have set limits to constitutional amendments and exceeded constitutional limits through dismemberment.

Abstract The concept of constitution substitution is a notion that has not been developed by constituent power, and in that measure, the Colombian Constitutional Court has established a precedent for the amendment process of the Legislative Act, which is performed by congress in order to limit the power of constituted power. In spite the fact that the Court has stated that there are no clauses written in stone, it has forged some fundamental principles and consolidated the defining axes, is what resume the theory of substituting. However, constitutional amendments have some limits to what Richard Albert makes a reference and summarize in 4 fundamental characteristics, that should not exceed the constitutional scope. As was pointed out by Albert the power to amend is one above all that does not exceed the scope of what was intended in the constitution, but there may be an intermediate point which he calls dismemberment, which is more than an amendment but does not get to become a structural reform of the constitution. Let's see how Colombia's Constitution and the Constitutional Court have set limits to constitutional amendments and exceeded constitutional limits through dismemberment.

The concept of constitution substitution is a notion that has not been developed by constituent power, and in that measure, the Colombian Constitutional Court has established a precedent for the amendment process of the Legislative Act, which is performed by congress in order to limit the power of constituted power. In spite the fact that the Court has stated that there are no clauses written in stone, it has forged some fundamental principles and consolidated the defining axes, is what resume the theory of substituting. However, constitutional amendments have some limits to what Richard Albert makes a reference and summarize in 4 fundamental characteristics, that should not exceed the constitutional scope. As was pointed out by Albert the power to amend is one above all that does not exceed the scope of what was intended in the constitution, but there may be an intermediate point which he calls dismemberment, which is more than an amendment but does not get to become a structural reform of the constitution. Let's see how Colombia's Constitution and the Constitutional Court have set limits to constitutional amendments and exceeded constitutional limits through dismemberment.

Considers (89) S. 272, (89) S. 628, (89) H.R. 6926. ; Considers. S. 272 and similar S. 628, to amend Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Act of 1954 to increase maximum amount for which an employee may be insured. H.R. 6926, to strengthen financial condition of Employees Life Insurance Fund created by Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Act of 1954 to provide adjustments in amounts of group life and group accidental death and dismemberment insurance. ; Record is based on bibliographic data in CIS US Congressional Committee Hearings Index. Reuse except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc. ; Indexed in CIS US Congressional Committee Hearings Index Part VIII ; Considers (89) S. 272, (89) S. 628, (89) H.R. 6926. ; Considers. S. 272 and similar S. 628, to amend Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Act of 1954 to increase maximum amount for which an employee may be insured. H.R. 6926, to strengthen financial condition of Employees Life Insurance Fund created by Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Act of 1954 to provide adjustments in amounts of group life and group accidental death and dismemberment insurance. ; Mode of access: Internet.