Deciphering the Democratic People's Republic of Korea
In: International politics reviews, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 65-77
ISSN: 2050-2990
187856 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International politics reviews, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 65-77
ISSN: 2050-2990
In: Naval forces: international forum for maritime power, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 129-143
ISSN: 0722-8880
In: The Good Society: a PEGS journal, Band 11, Heft 3, S. 36-42
ISSN: 1538-9731
This paper considers the opportunities for effective humanitarian collaboration in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). It brings together perspectives from three individuals with extensive lived experience working in the DPRK. Collectively, these authors have worked in various sectors of international humanitarian aid and other areas of engagement such as emergency response and preparedness, education, social enterprise and tourism. The paper draws from these experiences to present lessons on overcoming obstacles and harnessing opportunities in the DPRK.
BASE
This paper considers the opportunities for effective humanitarian collaboration in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). It brings together perspectives from three individuals with extensive lived experience working in the DPRK. Collectively, these authors have worked in various sectors of international humanitarian aid and other areas of engagement such as emergency response and preparedness, education, social enterprise and tourism. The paper draws from these experiences to present lessons on overcoming obstacles and harnessing opportunities in the DPRK.
BASE
On October 18-20, 2001, the 16th Annual Conference of the Council on U.S.-Korean Security Studies was held in Washington, DC. Created in 1985 by retired generals Richard Stilwell of the United States and Sun Yup Paik of the Republic of Korea, the Council's aim was to initiate a conference that would bring together top scholars and practitioners on the most important issues facing the two countries and their important bilateral alliance. Since then, the Council has successfully hosted an annual conference, alternating every other year between meetings in Seoul and Washington. Because of the unexpected attacks on the World Trade Center in New York just 1 month prior to the conference, the papers did not capture adequately an assessment of the actual and potential impact of the terrorist attack on U.S. foreign policy, its implications for the two Koreas, and its probable effects on China and Russia. There were suggestions that the attack would have major effects, but few details about what those would be, which was understandable with so little time having elapsed since the attack. On the other hand, several authors stressed that in important ways much had not changed: U.S. commitments had not been shifted or weakened; the U.S. ability to militarily uphold its commitments had not been affected; and the solidarity of the ROK-U.S. alliance again had been demonstrated through South Korea's strong support for the war on terrorism. ; https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/1089/thumbnail.jpg
BASE
On October 18-20, 2001, the 16th Annual Conference of the Council on U.S.-Korean Security Studies was held in Washington, DC. Created in 1985 by retired generals Richard Stilwell of the United States and Sun Yup Paik of the Republic of Korea, the Council's aim was to initiate a conference that would bring together top scholars and practitioners on the most important issues facing the two countries and their important bilateral alliance. Since then, the Council has successfully hosted an annual conference, alternating every other year between meetings in Seoul and Washington. Because of the unexpected attacks on the World Trade Center in New York just 1 month prior to the conference, the papers did not capture adequately an assessment of the actual and potential impact of the terrorist attack on U.S. foreign policy, its implications for the two Koreas, and its probable effects on China and Russia. There were suggestions that the attack would have major effects, but few details about what those would be, which was understandable with so little time having elapsed since the attack. On the other hand, several authors stressed that in important ways much had not changed: U.S. commitments had not been shifted or weakened; the U.S. ability to militarily uphold its commitments had not been affected; and the solidarity of the ROK-U.S. alliance again had been demonstrated through South Korea's strong support for the war on terrorism. ; https://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/1039/thumbnail.jpg
BASE
In: Asian Development Bank economic staff paper, 27
World Affairs Online
In: Sravnitelʹnaja politika: Comparative politics Russia, Band 14, Heft 1-2, S. 97-114
ISSN: 2412-4990
In: Disarmament: a periodic review by the United Nations, Band 18, Heft 2, S. 119-134
ISSN: 0251-9518
In: World health forum: an intern. journal of health development, Band 8, Heft 1987
ISSN: 0251-2432
In: Asian survey, Band 16, Heft 1, S. 82-94
ISSN: 1533-838X
In: International review of administrative sciences: an international journal of comparative public administration, Band 28, Heft 4, S. 441-448
ISSN: 1461-7226
In: Journalism quarterly, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 85-86
In: Current history: a journal of contemporary world affairs, Band 15, Heft 86, S. 218-221
ISSN: 1944-785X