Less than Full Marx
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 351-356
ISSN: 0090-5917
237 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 351-356
ISSN: 0090-5917
In: Political theory: an international journal of political philosophy, Band 34, Heft 3, S. 351-356
ISSN: 0090-5917
In: European journal of political theory: EJPT, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 469-470
ISSN: 1474-8851
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 5, Heft 4, S. 494-496
ISSN: 1470-8914
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 101-103
ISSN: 1476-9336
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 101-103
ISSN: 1470-8914
In: International feminist journal of politics, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 449-450
ISSN: 1461-6742
In: International feminist journal of politics, Band 7, Heft 3, S. 449-450
ISSN: 1461-6742
In: New political science: a journal of politics & culture, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 244-246
ISSN: 0739-3148
In: New political science: a journal of politics & culture, Band 26, Heft 2, S. 244-246
ISSN: 0739-3148
In: International affairs, Band 80, Heft 1, S. 92-94
ISSN: 0020-5850
In this second commentary on Gillian Youngs's (2004) article, Carver turns from Youngs's image of the 'gulf' between mainstream/malestream international relations, on the one hand, & feminist international relations on the other, to that of 'war' & asks if critical feminist & mainstream/malestream scholars in IR are even in the same world. He senses a level of intellectual & professional conflict that amounts to a 'war of the worlds' & argues for new skills to be adopted & new ways of thinking introduced into the discipline transforming it so that gender no longer divides its practitioners methodologically & personally. Most men in IR still need to address the 'lived experience' that feminists have so far successfully tackled in mainstream IR. Adapted from the source document.
In: International affairs, Band 80, Heft 1, S. 92-94
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 80, Heft 1, S. 92-94
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International affairs, Band 80, Heft 1, S. 92-94
ISSN: 0020-5850
The antiglobalism of Michael Hardt & Antonio Negri -- the so-called Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels of the Internet age -- is contrasted with that opposed by their namesakes, focusing on ideas expressed in (respectively) Empire (2000) & the Communist Manifesto (Terrell Carver's edition & translation, 1996). It is argued that the neoliberal ideology of globalism "invokes illusions & erasures that promote class interests," by relying on "foundational ideologies of nature, civilization, science, progress, & consumption." To be effective, antiglobalism must counteract both these ideological & doctrinal bases. A reading of Hardt & Negri's antiglobalism through the eyes of Marx & Engels reveals it to be less than effective in accomplishing this; indeed, it resembles the "critical criticism" to which they were politically & intellectually opposed. Marx & Engels's discussion of globalization in terms of capitalism, production for profit, imperialism, class struggle, political economy, & exploitation is reviewed; their treatment of the ideology of globalism is also analyzed. While Hardt & Negri profess to oppose globalization on the same grounds as Marx & Engels, their argument is more an intellectual debate than a "credible call to political action.". K. Hyatt Stewart