In: Political geography: an interdisciplinary journal for all students of political studies with an interest in the geographical and spatial aspects, Band 40, S. 25-34
This paper takes as its starting point the argument that infrastructure networks cannot merely be thought of as the backdrop against which climate politics is played out in the city, but are instead fundamental to the ways in which this is conducted. Bringing infrastructure networks into view as a central tenet to the governing of climate change is not simply a matter of recognizing such spheres as critical sites for urban climate policy, but rather requires a conceptual approach that moves beyond a concern with the capacities of individual actors and institutions, and engages with the ways in which power operates and is constituted through the socio-materiality of the city. Drawing on theories of governmentality we develop such an approach and use it to examine the ways in which housing is providing a means through which experimentation with climate governance is taking place in Cape Town and São Paulo. Through this analysis we find that climate change is being mobilized both as a means to create new flows of carbon finance and as a means through which to advance calls for social inclusion and 'dignified' housing. Rather than being characterized by one dominant model, we suggest that the governing of climate change in cities in the global South is multiple, combining market and social logics in eclectic ways, where one is not predominant and both are in constant negotiation, dialogue and contestation.
This paper draws on work undertaken through Harriet Bulkeley's ESRC Climate Change Fellowship, Urban Transitions: climate change, global cities and the transformation of socio-technical systems (ESRC RES-066-27-0002) ; Debates about climate justice have mainly occurred at the international scale, and have focussed on the rights and responsibilities of nation-states to either be protected from the effects of climate change, or to take action to reduce emissions or support adaptation. In this paper, we argue that it is both productive and necessary to examine how climate justice is being pursued at the urban scale, which brings into focus the need for attention to issues of recognition as well as rights and responsibilities. Building on work from environmental justice, which has conceptualized justice as trivalent, we propose that climate justice can be understood as a pyramid, the faces of which are distributions, procedures, rights, responsibilities and recognition. We then apply this conceptual framework to examine climate change interventions in five cities; Bangalore, Monterrey, Hong Kong, Philadelphia and Berlin. Arguing that the politics and practices of urban climate change interventions are constantly engaging with and refracting the idea of justice, we examine how justice was articulated, practiced and contested across our cases. The perspective of recognition emerges as a particularly useful entry point through which to explore the types of rights, responsibilities, distributions and procedures required to respond justly to climate change. We conclude by reflecting on our framework, arguing that it is useful both as an analytical device to interrogate climate justice and to shape the design of climate change interventions which seek to ensure climate justice. ; Publisher PDF ; Peer reviewed
This paper takes as its starting point the argument that infrastructure networks cannot merely be thought of as the backdrop against which climate politics is played out in the city, but are instead fundamental to the ways in which this is conducted. Bringing infrastructure networks into view as a central tenet to the governing of climate change is not simply a matter of recognizing such spheres as critical sites for urban climate policy, but rather requires a conceptual approach that moves beyond a concern with the capacities of individual actors and institutions, and engages with the ways in which power operates and is constituted through the socio-materiality of the city. Drawing on theories of governmentality we develop such an approach and use it to examine the ways in which housing is providing a means through which experimentation with climate governance is taking place in Cape Town and São Paulo. Through this analysis we find that climate change is being mobilized both as a means to create new flows of carbon finance and as a means through which to advance calls for social inclusion and 'dignified' housing. Rather than being characterized by one dominant model, we suggest that the governing of climate change in cities in the global South is multiple, combining market and social logics in eclectic ways, where one is not predominant and both are in constant negotiation, dialogue and contestation.
Introduction : promises and concerns of the urban century / Jeroen van der Heijden, Harriet Bulkeley, and Chiara Certomà -- Unpacking agency in global urban climate covernance : city-networks as actors, agents, and arenas / David J. Gordon -- Empowerment and disempowerment of urban climate governance initiatives : an exploratory typology of mechanisms / James J. Patterson and Nicolien van der Grijp -- Transnational municipal networks and cities in climate governance : experiments in Brazil / Fabiana Barbi and Laura Valente de Macedo -- Making climates through the city / Lauren Rickards -- Cross-movement alliances as a novel form of agency to increase socially just arrangements in urban climate governance / Karsten Schulz and Antje Bruns -- The politics of data-driven urban climate change mitigation / Sara Hughes, Laura Tozer, Sarah Giest -- Urban planning for sustainability and justice : lessons from urban agriculture / Francois Mancebo and Chiara Certomà -- Unpacking the black box of urban climate agency : (dis)empowerment and inclusion in local participatory processes / Scott Morton Ninomiya and Sarah Burch -- From public to citizen responsibilities in urban climate adaptation : a thick analysis / Caroline J. Uittenbroek, Heleen L.P. Mees, Dries L.T. Hegger and Peter P.J. Driessen -- Agency and climate governance in African cities : lessons from urban agriculture / Christopher Gore -- The effects of transnational municipal networks on urban climate politics in the global South / Fee Stehle, Chris Hohne, Thomas Hickmann, and Markus Lederer -- The politics of urban climate futures : recognition, experimentation, orchestration / Jeroen van der Heijden, Chiara Certomà, Harriet Bulkeley,
Since the 1990s, a burgeoning literature has emerged on the politics and governance of urban climate. It is now evident that urban responses to climate change involve a diverse range of actors as well as forms of agency that cross traditional boundaries, and which have diverse consequences for (dis)empowering different social groups. This book provides an overview of the forms of agency in urban climate politics, discussing the friction and power dynamics between them. Written by renowned scholars, it critically assesses the advantages and limitations of increasing agency in urban climate governance. In doing so, it sheds critical new light on the existing literature, advances the state of knowledge of urban climate governance and discusses ways to accelerate urban climate action. With chapters building on case studies from across the world, it is ideal for scholars and practitioners working in the area of urban climate politics and governance
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Introduction : promises and concerns of the urban century / Jeroen van der Heijden, Harriet Bulkeley, and Chiara Certomà -- Unpacking agency in global urban climate covernance : city-networks as actors, agents, and arenas / David J. Gordon -- Empowerment and disempowerment of urban climate governance initiatives : an exploratory typology of mechanisms / James J. Patterson and Nicolien van der Grijp -- Transnational municipal networks and cities in climate governance : experiments in Brazil / Fabiana Barbi and Laura Valente de Macedo -- Making climates through the city / Lauren Rickards -- Cross-movement alliances as a novel form of agency to increase socially just arrangements in urban climate governance / Karsten Schulz and Antje Bruns -- The politics of data-driven urban climate change mitigation / Sara Hughes, Laura Tozer, Sarah Giest -- Urban planning for sustainability and justice : lessons from urban agriculture / Francois Mancebo and Chiara Certomà -- Unpacking the black box of urban climate agency : (dis)empowerment and inclusion in local participatory processes / Scott Morton Ninomiya and Sarah Burch -- From public to citizen responsibilities in urban climate adaptation : a thick analysis / Caroline J. Uittenbroek, Heleen L.P. Mees, Dries L.T. Hegger and Peter P.J. Driessen -- Agency and climate governance in African cities : lessons from urban agriculture / Christopher Gore -- The effects of transnational municipal networks on urban climate politics in the global South / Fee Stehle, Chris Hohne, Thomas Hickmann, and Markus Lederer -- The politics of urban climate futures : recognition, experimentation, orchestration / Jeroen van der Heijden, Chiara Certomà, Harriet Bulkeley,
Abstract Growing recognition of the need to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss together is leading to shifts in the global environmental governance landscape such that these two traditionally separate domains are increasingly interlinked. This process is taking place not at the level of the international policy regimes but rather through the work of transnational governance initiatives (TGIs) that connect state and non-state actors and which form an increasingly formalized part of the hybrid regime complexes through which global environmental governance is conducted. Central to these dynamics are 'nature-based solutions', interventions designed to work with nature to achieve multiple sustainability goals. In this paper, we demonstrate the ways in which TGIs frame and implement nature-based solutions. We show how this is leading to an evolution in market and asset-based responses to addressing these twin challenges and consider the wider consequences for how we understand what effective responses to the interlinked problems of climate and biodiversity entail.
The rapid global deployment of solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies since the early 2000s has attracted sus- tained attention. Solar PV has become an increasingly established, widespread and flexible form of electricity generation. In the research language of socio-technical or energy transitions, solar PV can reasonably be viewed as acquiring the characteristics of a 'socio-technical regime.' Such regimes are found where a co-evolving set of social and technical developments have built sufficient momentum for a particular technology to become ac- cepted as an established part of the energy provision system. As solar PV becomes integrated into the project of providing secure, affordable and sustainable energy for development, this momentum is now spreading across sub-Saharan Africa. In this article, we examine the emergence and adoption of solar PV in Mozambique and South Africa. While solar PV has gained ground in both cases, it has done so in different ways and with varying consequences. Our analysis suggests that even as niche technologies reach maturity and transcend the contexts from which they have emerged, they remain constituted through multiple sets of relations that are continually remade, such that the geographies, histories and politics of transitions are an ongoing project. Such a perspective, drawing on energy geographies and landscape studies, can enrich the sustainability transitions literature, enhancing our understanding of different ways of developing and adopting solar PV in particular places.
This paper takes as its starting point the argument that infrastructure networks cannot merely be thought of as the backdrop against which climate politics is played out in the city, but are instead fundamental to the ways in which this is conducted. Bringing infrastructure networks into view as a central tenet to the governing of climate change is not simply a matter of recognizing such spheres as critical sites for urban climate policy, but rather requires a conceptual approach that moves beyond a concern with the capacities of individual actors and institutions, and engages with the ways in which power operates and is constituted through the socio-materiality of the city. Drawing on theories of governmentality we develop such an approach and use it to examine the ways in which housing is providing a means through which experimentation with climate governance is taking place in Cape Town and São Paulo. Through this analysis we find that climate change is being mobilized both as a means to create new flows of carbon finance and as a means through which to advance calls for social inclusion and 'dignified' housing. Rather than being characterized by one dominant model, we suggest that the governing of climate change in cities in the global South is multiple, combining market and social logics in eclectic ways, where one is not predominant and both are in constant negotiation, dialogue and contestation
The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, more widely known as 'Rio+20', was a significant global political event, but it left many important questions relating to the future of sustainability governance unanswered. This paper introduces a theme issue on "Governing sustainability: Rio+20 and the road beyond". It is organized around three themes which are addressed at greater detail in the different papers: (i) the current status of governance for sustainability in the aftermath of Rio+20; (ii) whether or not sustainable development still has political and institutional relevance; and (iii) institutional and political opportunities and obstacles for governing sustainability in the future. The paper argues that both sustainability governance and the sustainable development concept are under growing pressure amid a perceived failure to deliver change, but identifies three opportunities to advance sustainability: (i) by reframing the way in which problems of unsustainability are described and approached; (ii) via the formulation of effective sustainable development goals; and (iii) by identifying novel ways to open up the sustainable development debate to more actors and interests.