Suchergebnisse

Modern applications are increasingly dynamic and heterogeneous. The architecture of modern systems is no longer rigid or predictable. This also applies to the user's needs, the capabilities of computers and networks, and the technologies we use. We consider essential that autonomic managers become dynamically extensible and adapt to these changes to facilitate the maintenance. The objective of our work is to define and implement a framework that facilitates the development of autonomic managers. With that purpose, we define an architectural model for the development of modular, homogeneous, flexible, administrable and dynamic autonomic managers. An important objective of this work is to clearly define and separate the generic concepts belonging to autonomic managers from business aspects, developed on a case-by-case basis. The goal is to enable the experts to concentrate on writing autonomic functions and not to bother with management and control flow of these functions. To achieve our objectives, we first define the concept of administration task. An administration task is an independent and specialized element that achieves one or more administrative functions. The autonomic manager behaviour results from the opportunistic combination of these tasks. At every moment, all tasks used can be changed depending on the context and the information given by the platform. Selection mechanisms help to manage potential conflicts and ensure consistency of manager behaviour. We then define an architecture to manage tasks and their opportunistic cooperation depending on the context. The current framework prototype is based on a Service Oriented Component technology. The developed framework allows the dynamic integration of autonomic functions and their management depending on context and management politics, themselves evolving. In conclusion we present a particular implementation of the framework as a component model so that the work of developers is facilitated and that reuse is promoted. Finally, we give an example of an ...

Modern applications are increasingly dynamic and heterogeneous. The architecture of modern systems is no longer rigid or predictable. This also applies to the user's needs, the capabilities of computers and networks, and the technologies we use. We consider essential that autonomic managers become dynamically extensible and adapt to these changes to facilitate the maintenance. The objective of our work is to define and implement a framework that facilitates the development of autonomic managers. With that purpose, we define an architectural model for the development of modular, homogeneous, flexible, administrable and dynamic autonomic managers. An important objective of this work is to clearly define and separate the generic concepts belonging to autonomic managers from business aspects, developed on a case-by-case basis. The goal is to enable the experts to concentrate on writing autonomic functions and not to bother with management and control flow of these functions. To achieve our objectives, we first define the concept of administration task. An administration task is an independent and specialized element that achieves one or more administrative functions. The autonomic manager behaviour results from the opportunistic combination of these tasks. At every moment, all tasks used can be changed depending on the context and the information given by the platform. Selection mechanisms help to manage potential conflicts and ensure consistency of manager behaviour. We then define an architecture to manage tasks and their opportunistic cooperation depending on the context. The current framework prototype is based on a Service Oriented Component technology. The developed framework allows the dynamic integration of autonomic functions and their management depending on context and management politics, themselves evolving. In conclusion we present a particular implementation of the framework as a component model so that the work of developers is facilitated and that reuse is promoted. Finally, we give an example of an ...

De juin à décembre 1963, nous avons parcouru plus de 15 000 miles en Inde afin d'enquêter sur le terrain au sujet des nouveaux systèmes de colonisation agricole. Nous ne pouvions, dans le laps de temps dont nous disposions, étudier toutes les réalisations de ce genre bien que nous ayions visité tous les États de l'Union sauf l'Assam, le Gujarat, le Jammu, le Kashmir et le Bengale occidental. Étant donné que, pour l'Inde, nous n'avons pas eu en mains une liste semblable à celle que nous avons trouvée dans les Administration Reports of the Land Commissioner, en ce qui concerne Ceylan, nous avons dû essentiellement nous fier aux listes des réalisations à visiter que nous avaient préparées divers fonctionnaires de New Delhi et de plusieurs États.

AbstractThe so-calledMaterialismusstreitevolved in the second half of the 19th century as a new genre of popular literature and was carried out as a public debate mainly by German popularisers. In the Ottoman context, however, the reception of theMaterialismusstreitdemonstrates how a universalised perception of the West had already become the main frame of reference among secularly educated Ottoman intelligentsia in the course of late Ottoman modernity. This fact not only constitutively shaped their modern discourse on Islam. Moreover, it brought about at the same time fundamental semantic shifts in concepts holding a prominent role within the Islamicate epistemological tradition. Consequently, the entanglement between this abovementioned frame of reference and concepts inherited from a traditional knowledge order resulted in a conceptual rupture with the traditional epistemologies. In an attempt to exemplify the argument, this paper builds on a less-known dispute on materialism between Celal Nuri and Ahmed Hilmi (Filibeli), and shows the transformation in their usage of epistemic concepts such asʿilm,fenn, anddīn, as well as their reception of the Orientalist Islam discourse. Prior to the analysis of two core primary sources, the first part of this paper elaborates on the theoretical and methodological modalities of making fruitful the intellectual output of late Ottoman modernity for a globally entangled intellectual history.

Der Islam in Deutschland blickt auf eine über 50jährige Geschichte zurück, die wesentlich auf die Arbeitsmigration aus islamisch geprägten Ländern zurückgeht. Obwohl die Zahl der Muslime und ihre religiösen Organisationen bereits seit den 1970er Jahren stark zugenommen hat, sind islamkonnotierte Themen und Debatten erst zu Beginn der 2000er Jahre zu verzeichnen. Zum einen ist diese Entwicklung im Kontext globaler und europäischer Prozesse zu bewerten. Zum anderen aber auch die Tatsache, dass infolge der quantitativen und qualitativen Relevanz der muslimischen Minorität die Politik den Islam im integrations- und bildungspolitischen Kontext nicht mehr ausblenden konnte. Vor dem Hintergrund dieser ambivalenten Entwicklung hat sich der vorliegende Band zum Ziel gesetzt, eine Bestandsaufnahme der 50jährigen islamischen Geschichte im Kontext der Arbeitsmigration vorzulegen. In fünf zentralen Themenschwerpunkten soll das Leben der Muslime in Deutschland analysiert werden, um ein Gesamtbild zu erarbeiten. Der Inhalt Gesellschaftliche Wahrnehmung und gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz der Muslime in Deutschland • Rechtliche Anerkennung des Islam in Deutschland • Akademische und schulische Integration des Islam - Stand und Perspektiven • Muslimische Identitäten und Religiosität • Muslimische Strukturen und Organisationen. Die Zielgruppen Studierende und Lehrende der Religions- und Migrationssoziologie, Religionswissenschaftlerinnen und -wissenschaftler. Die Herausgeber Dr. theol. Dr. phil. Peter Antes ist emerierter Professor an der Universität Hannover. Dr. rer. soc. Dr. phil. Rauf Ceylan ist Professor an der Universität Osnabrück